Advertisement

Fossil Thecamoebians: Present Status and Prospects for the Future

  • Franco S. Medioli
  • David B. Scott
  • Eric S. Collins
  • Francine M. G. McCarthy
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 327)

Abstract

Some basic facts concerning the biology, ecology and taxonomic problems of thecamoebians are reviewed and summarized on the assumption that this information is useful for the palaeontological applications of this group.

The scarce fossil record of the group is also reviewed, discussed and analyzed in some detail. In the process, this article makes available to most paleontologists practically all the relevant published information on fossilized thecamoebians as this commonly is difficult to obtain.

Keywords

Middle Eocene Diatom Frustule Testate Amoeba Green River Formation Foraminiferal Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartlett, G. A. (1966) Distribution and abundance of Foraminifera and Thecamoebina in Mirimachi River and Bay. Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Report # 66–2, 104 pp. (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  2. Bolli, H.M. and Saunders, J.B. (1954) Discussion of some Thecamoebina described erroneously as Foraminifera. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, 5, 45–52Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, W.H. (1931) Origin and microfossils of the oil shale of the Green River formation of Colorado and Utah. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 168, 58 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, W.B. (1861) On the systematic arrangement of the Rhizopoda: Natural History Revue, 1, 456–472.Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter, W.B., Parker, W.K., and Jones, T.R. (1862) Introduction to the study of the Foraminifera.319 pp., Ray Society Publications; London.Google Scholar
  6. Cash, J., Wailes, G.H. and Hopkinson, J. (1915) The British fresh-water Rhizopoda andHeliozoa, by: Wailes G.H.: 156 pp., Ray Society Publications; London.Google Scholar
  7. Claparede, E. and Lachman, J. (1859) Etude sur les Infusoires et les Rhizopodes. v.1, l’InstitutGenèvois, Memoires, 6, 261–482.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, E.S., McCarthy, F.M.G., Medioli, F.S., Scott, D.B., Honig, C.A., (this volume) Biogeographic distribution of modern thecamoebians in a transect along the Eastern North American Coast.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, E.S., McCarthy, F.M.G., Medioli, F.S., Kerr, H.A., Honig, C.A., Scott, D.B., Schroder-Adams, C.J. and McAndrews, J.H. (1989) Arcellaceans as palaeoecological indicators, poster presented at the Conference NATO ASI and IWAF III, Tübingen Sept. 18–21 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Cushman, J.A. (1930) The Foraminifera of the Choctawhatchee Formation of Florida. Florida State Geological Survey, Bulletin, 4, 1–63Google Scholar
  11. Davis, C.A. (1916) On the fossil algae of the petroleum-yielding shales of the Green River Formation of Colorado and Utah. National Academy of Science, Proceedings, 2, 114–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Decloitre, L. (1953) Recherches sur les Rhizopodes Thecamoebiens d’A.O.F. Institut Français d’Afrique Noire, Memoires 31, 1–149.Google Scholar
  13. Deflandre, G. (1928) Le genre Arcella Ehrenberg. Morphologie-biologie. Essay phylogénétique et systématique. Archiv fur Protistenkunde, 64, 152–287.Google Scholar
  14. Deflandre, G. (1953) Ordres des Testacealobosa (De Saedeleer, 1934), Testaceafilosa (De Saedeleer, 1934, Thalamia (Haeckel, 1862) ou Thécamoebiens (Auct.) (Rhizopoda, Testacea), in: Grassé, P.P., ed., Traité de Zoologie: 1, 97–148, Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrenberg, G.C. (1832) Über die Entwicklung und Lebensdauer der Infusionsthiere, nebst ferneren Beiträgen zu einer vergleichung ihrer organischen Systeme. Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Physikalische Abhandlungen, 1831, 1–154.Google Scholar
  16. Ehrenberg, G.C. (1872a) Übersicht der seit 1847 fortgesetzten Untersuchungen über das von der Atmosphäre unsichtbar getragene reiche organische Leben. Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Physikalische Abhandlungen, 1871, 1–150.Google Scholar
  17. Ehrenberg, G.C. (1872b) Nachtrag zur Übersicht der organischen Atmosphärilien. Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Physikalische Abhandlungen, 1871, 233–275.Google Scholar
  18. Ellison, R.L., and Nichols, M.M. (1976) Modern and Holocene foraminifera in the Chesapeake Bay Region. 1st International Symposium on Benthonic Foraminifera of the Continental Margins, Part A, Ecology and Biology, Maritime Sediments, Special publication # 1, 131–151.Google Scholar
  19. Frenguelli, G. (1933) Tecamebiani e Diatomee nel Miocene del Neuquén (Patagonia Settentrionale). Bollettino delia Società Geológica Italiana, 52, 33–43.Google Scholar
  20. Griffin, J.L. (1972) Movement, fine structure, and fusion of pseudopods of an enclosed amoeba, Difflugiella sp.. Journal of Cell Science, 10, 563–583.Google Scholar
  21. Gruber, A. (1884) Die Protozoen des Hafens von Genua. Nova Acta Academiae cesareae leopoldino-Carolinae Germanichae Natura Curiosorum, 66, 473–539.Google Scholar
  22. Haman, D. (1982) Modern Thecamoebinids (Arcellinida) from the Belize Delta, Louisiana. Transactions, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, 32, 353–376.Google Scholar
  23. Haman, D. (in press) Living thecamoebinid distribution, biotopes and biofacies, in an upper deltaic plain subenvironment, Lac des Allemans, Louisiana. Revista Española de Micropaleontología.Google Scholar
  24. Hedley, R.H. and Ogden, C.G. (1973) Biology and fine structure of Euglypha rotunda (Testacea: Protozoa). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology), 25, 119–137.Google Scholar
  25. Hedley, R.H. and Ogden, CG. (1974) Observations on Trinema lineare Penard (Testacea: Protozoa). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology), 26, 187–199.Google Scholar
  26. Honig, C.A. and Scott, D.B. (1987) Postglacial stratigraphy and sea-level change in southwestern New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 24, 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoogenraad, H.R. and De Groot, A.A. (1941) Observations on a special manner of feeding of a species of Difflugia (D. rubescens Penard). Proceedings of the Nederlandsche Akademie Van Wetenschappen, 44, 217–228.Google Scholar
  28. Jennings, H.S. (1937) Formation, inheritance and variation of the teeth in Difflugia corona. A study of the morphogenic activities of rhizopod protoplasm. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 77, 287–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joyon, L., and Charret, R. (1962) Sur l’ultrastructure du Thecamoebien Hyalosphenia papilio (Leidy). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, 255, 2661–2663.Google Scholar
  30. Kent, W.S. (1880) A Manual of the Infusoria, including a description of all known Flagellate, Ciliate and Tentaculiferous Protozoa, British and Foreign, and an account of the organization and affinities of the Sponges: 1, Bogue, London, 1–472.Google Scholar
  31. Kövary, J. (1956) Thékamöbák (Testaceák) a magyarországy alsòpannòniai korú üled ékekböl. Földtani Közlöny, 86, 266–273.Google Scholar
  32. Lankester, E.R. (1885) Protozoa. In: Encyclopedia Britannica, v. 19, 9th edition, 830–866.Google Scholar
  33. Leidy, J. (1879) Fresh-water Rhizopods of North America: United States Geological Survey of the Territories, Report, 12, 1–324.Google Scholar
  34. Loeblich, A.R. jr and Tappan, H. (1955) Revision of some Recent foraminiferal genera. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection, 128, 1–37.Google Scholar
  35. Loeblich, A.R. jr and Tappan, H. (1968) Lorica composition of modern and fossil Tininnida (Ciliate protozoea), Systematics, geologic distribution and some new Tertiary Taxa. J. Paleontology, 42, 1378–1394.Google Scholar
  36. Loeblich, A.R. jr and Tappan, H. (1964) Sarcodina, chiefly “Thecamoebians” and Foraminiferida. In: Moore, R.C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part C, Protista II: v.1, p.i-xxxi + C1 - C510a, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  37. McLean, J.R. and Wall, J.H. (1981) The Early Cretaceous Moosebar Sea in Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 29, 334–377.Google Scholar
  38. Medioli, F.S., and Scott, D.B. (1983) Holocene Arcellacea (Thecamoebians) from Eastern Canada. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 21, 1–63.Google Scholar
  39. Medioli, F.S., and Scott, D.B. (1988) Lacustrine thecamoebians (mainly Arcellaceans) as potential tools for palaeolimnological interpretations. Paleogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 62, 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Medioli, F.S., Scott, D.B, and Wall, J.T. (1986) Early Cretaceous Arcellacea from Ruby Creek, Alberta. Abstract. Annual Geological Society Meeting, San Antonio, Nov. 1986.Google Scholar
  41. Medioli, F.S., Scott, D.B, and Abbott, B.H. (1987) A case study of Protozoan intraclonal variability: Taxonomic implications. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 17, 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Medioli, F.S., Scott, D.B, Collins, E.S. and Wall, J.T. (this volume) Thecamoebians from Early Cretaceous deposits of Ruby Creek, Alberta.Google Scholar
  43. Miner, E.L. (1935) Paleobotanical examinations of Cretaceous and Tertiary coals. The American Midland Naturalist, 16, 585–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Minkiewicz, R. (1900) Petites études morphologiques sur le “Limnoplancton”. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 23, 618–623.Google Scholar
  45. Ogden, C.G. and Hedley, R.H. (1980) An Atlas of Freshwater Testate Amoebae. British Museum (Natural History), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1–222.Google Scholar
  46. Patterson, R.T., MacKinnon, K.D., Scott, D.B. and Medioli, F.S. (1985) Arcellaceans (Thecamoebians) in small lakes of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Modern distribution and Holocene stratigraphie changes. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 15, 114–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Penard, E. (1902) Faune rhizopodique du bassin du Léman. Henry Kündig, Genève, 714 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Reeves, C.C.jr. (1968) Introduction to Paleolimnology Developments, in; Sedimentology II: Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 228pp.Google Scholar
  49. Schönborn, W. (1962) Über Planktismus und Zyklomorphose bei Difflugia limnetica (Levander) Penard. Limnologica, 1, 21–34.Google Scholar
  50. Scott, D.B., Medioli, F.S. (1983) Agglutinated Rhizopods in Lake Erie: modern distribution and stratigraphie implications. Journal of Paleontology, 54, 809–820.Google Scholar
  51. Scott, D.B., Medioli, F.S. and Schafer, CT. (1977) Temporal changes in foraminiferal distribution in Mirimachi River Estuary, New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14, 1566–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scott, D.B., Schafer, C.T., and Medioli, F.S. (1980) Eastern Canadian estuarine Foraminifera: a framework for comparison. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 10, 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Siebold, C.T.E., von, (1845) Wirbellose Thiere: part I; In: Siebold (von) and Stannius (von) (Eds.): Lehrbuch der Vergleichenden Anatomie, 679 pp.Google Scholar
  54. Spandel, E. (1909) Der Rupelton des Mainzer Beckens, seine Abteilungen und deren Foraminiferenfauna. Offenbacher Vereins Naturkunde, Berlin, #43–50, 57–230.Google Scholar
  55. Stump, A.B. (1935) Observations on the feeding of Difflugia, Pontigulasia and Lesquereusia. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Biological Bulletin, 69, 136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thibaudeau, S.A., Medioli, F.S. (1986) Carboniferous thecamoebians and marsh foraminifera: new stratigraphie tools for ancient paralic deposits. Abstract. Geological Society of America, Annual Meeting, San Antonio, p.771.Google Scholar
  57. Thibaudeau, S.A., Medioli, F.S. and Scott, D.B. (1987) Carboniferous marginal-marine Rhizopods: a morphological comparison with recent correspondents. Abstract. Geological Society of America, Annual Meeting, Phoenix, p.866.Google Scholar
  58. Todd, R. and Brönnimann, P. (1957) Recent Foraminifera and Thecamoebina from the eastern Gulf of Paria. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication n° 3, 43pp.Google Scholar
  59. Valkanov, A. (1962a) Über die Kopulation der Testaceen (Rhizopoda-Testacea). [Doklady Bolgarskoi Akademii Nauk] Report of the Bulgarian Academy of Science, 15, 305–308.Google Scholar
  60. Valkanov, A. (1962b) Paraquadrula madarica n.sp. (Rhizopoda- Testacea) und ihre Kopulation. [Doklady Bolgarskoi Akademii Nauk] Report of the Bulgarian Academy of Science, 15, 423–426.Google Scholar
  61. Valkanov, A. (1966) Über die Fortpflanzung der Testaceen (Rhizopoda-Testacea). [Bolgarska Akademiya na naukite. Izvestiya na Zoologischeskiya Institut s Muzei] Bulgarian Academy of Science. Bulletin of the Institut and the Museum of Zoology (Sofia), 22, 5–49.Google Scholar
  62. Vasicek, M., and Ruzicka, B. (1957) Namurian Thecamoebina from the Ostrava-Karvina coal district. Sborník Náradního Musea v Praze, Rada B., Prirodni Vedy-Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae, ser.B; Historia Naturalis, 13, 333–340.Google Scholar
  63. Wallich, G.C. (1864) On the extent, and some of the principal causes, of structural variation among the difflugian rhizopods. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser.3, 13, 215–245.Google Scholar
  64. Williamson, W.C. (1858) On the Recent Foraminifera of Great Britain. Ray Society, London, 107 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franco S. Medioli
    • 1
  • David B. Scott
    • 1
  • Eric S. Collins
    • 1
  • Francine M. G. McCarthy
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Marine GeologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations