Advertisement

Inverted Definitions and Their Uses

  • George N. Schlesinger
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 216)

Abstract

Consider the attempt to define ‘music’ briefly as ‘an artistic arrangement of sounds in varying melody, harmony, rhythm and timbre designed to give aesthetic pleasure’. I believe that, though it might be improved upon, it is a fair definition, genuinely conveying the gist of the definiendum’s meaning and capable of facilitating an understanding of the concept of music. On the other hand, the reverse proposition, consisting in an attempt to define’ sounds’ as ‘the elements of an artistic arrangement that varies in melody, harmony, rhythm and timbre, so designed as to give aesthetic pleasure’ would almost be futile.

Keywords

Moral Obligation Justify Belief Moral Consideration Deontic Logic Substantial Majority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Kim, ‘Events and Their Description: Some Considerations’ in N Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of C. G. Hempel (Dordrecht, 1969).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Davidson, ‘The Individuation of Events’, op. cit.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. V. Quine, ‘Mind and Verbal Disposition’ in S. Guttenplan (ed.), Mind and Language (Oxford, 1975), p. 88.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Nowell-Smith, ‘Morality: Religious and Secular’ in B. A. Brody (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Religion (Englewood Cliffs, 1974), p. 585.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Lewis, ‘Semantic Analyses for Dyadic Deontis Logic’ in S. Stenlund (ed.), Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis (Dordrecht, 1974).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    B. Hansson, ‘An Analysis of Some Deontis Logics’ in R. Hilpinen (ed.), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings (New York, 1974).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    I. Niiniluoto, ‘Hypothetical Imperatives and Conditional Obligations’, Synthese, vol. 66, 1986, pp. 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • George N. Schlesinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of North CarolinaUSA

Personalised recommendations