Aspects of the Theory of Definition
The nature of meaning and the definition of terms has preoccupied philosophers at least since the time of Socrates. The centrality of language with respect to the construction of arguments and the centrality of arguments to the advancement of philosophy makes the nature of meaning and the character of definitions of special importance in relation to philosophy. Indeed, these issues are sufficiently central that a philosopher’s theory of definition comes close to qualifying as that philosopher’s conception of methodology in philosophy. There can be little doubt of its importance for philosophy today.
KeywordsTrue Belief Logical Truth Reflective Equilibrium Syntactical Form Acceptable Definition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Austin, J. L. (1970), ‘Performative Utterances’, in J. L. Austin, Philosophical Papers (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), pp. 233–252.Google Scholar
- Cohen, M. and E. Nagel (1961), An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method (London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
- Hempel, C. G. (1952), Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
- Robinson, R. (1965), Definition (Oxford, UK: The Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
- Searle, J. (1973), Expression and Meaning (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- Whitehead, A. N. and B. Russel (1910), Principia Mathematica to 56 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar