Abstract
When philosophers talk about practical issues in public, the situation sometimes seems to me comparable to that of a clergyman trying to deliver a sermon after his false teeth have fallen out-everyone pays respectful attention, but no one knows what was said. Though I am told it is wrong to disappoint expectations, my chief objective is to lend some clarity to thinking about sex roles changes and the evaluation of them. I want to clarify the nature of sex roles, the sorts of changes they can undergo, and the sorts of values that are at stake. I am especially concerned with such values as freedom and equality, which, I shall maintain, are embodied in the notion of being an autonomous person. It is these values, I believe, that are appealed to when it is said that present-day sex role changes have aided the liberation of women, and that this is a good thing. While I agree with this assessment, I think that the points I make concerning autonomy can provide a basis for evaluating sex role changes, and will lead to the conclusion that not all sex role changes are truly liberating.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Russell, B. (1991). Sex Role Change and Autonomy. In: Russell, B. (eds) Freedom, Rights and Pornography. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3334-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3334-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5472-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3334-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive