Abstract
Any comparison presupposes a tertium comparationis, i.e. an invariant standard or measurement scale in terms of which the comparison can be made. In the natural sciences scale identity can be formally defined in terms of measurement procedures. In psychology where interactions occur between the measurement instruments and the objects of measurement, this identity cannot be taken for granted. This is especially so in research where the results of culturally divergent groups are compared. Various approaches to the analysis of scale equivalence of comparability in cross-cultural studies have been developed (Poortinga, 1983). Of these the analysis of item bias is the most important.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poortinga, Y.H. (1991). Conceptual Implications of Item Bias. In: Dann, P.L., Irvine, S.H., Collis, J.M. (eds) Advances in Computer-Based Human Assessment. Theory and Decision Library, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3322-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3322-7_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5467-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3322-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive