Abstract
Following the original paper of Bell1 the connection between the EPRargument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics2 and Bell’s inequality is usually established by saying that the former suggests the existence of a local hidden-variable theory for quantum mechanics whereas the latter then allows to show that such a theory does not exist.3.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Belinfante, F. J.: 1973, A Survey of Hidden-Variables Theories. Oxford.
Bell, J.: 1964, ‘On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox’, Physics 1, 195–200.
Bell, J.: 1966, ‘On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’, Rev. Mod. Phys 38, 447–52.
Bell. J.: 1971, ‘Introduction to the hidden-variables question’, Proc. Int. School of Phys. ‘Enrico Fermi’, course IL: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, New York, 171–81.
Bohm, D. J. and Hiley, B. J.: 1975, ‘On the Intuitive Understanding of Nonlocality as Implied by Quantum Theory’, Foundation of Physics 5, 93–109.
Bohr, N.: 1935, ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be considered Complete?’, Phys. Rev. 48, 696–702.
Clauser, J. and Shimony, A.: 1978, ‘Bell’s theorem: experimental tests and implications’, Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1881–1927.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N.: 1935, ‘Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?’, Phys. Rev. 47, 777–80.
Einstein, A.: 1948, ‘Quantenmechanik und Wirklichkeit’, Dialectica 2, 320–3.
Einstein, A.: 1949, Albert Einstein. Philosopher-scientist, ed. by A. Schilpp, Evanston, Illinois.
Einstein, A.: 1953, ‘Einleitende Bemerkungen über Grundbegriffe’, in: Louis de Broglie. Physicien et Penseur, Paris (German Edition Hamburg 1955).
Pitowsky, I.: 1989, Quantum Probability — Quantum Logic. Berlin.
Scheibe, E.: 1981, ‘Quantentheorie und verborgene Parameter’, Der Physikunterricht 15, 56–74.
Scheibe, E.: 1986, ‘What kind of hidden variables are excluded by Bell’s inequality?, in: Foundations of Physics. Papers Contrib. to the 7th Int. Congr. of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, ed. by P. Weingartner and G. Dorn, Vienna, 251–71.
Selleri, F., and Tarozzi, G. 1981, ‘Quantum Mechanics, Reality, and Separability’, Riv. del Nuovo Cimento 4, No. 2. 1–53.
Selleri, F.: 1988, ‘History of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox’, in: Quantum mechanics versus local realism, ed. by F. Selleri, New York, 1–61.
Summers, St. J. and Werner, R.: 1987, ‘Bell’s Inequalities and Quantum Field Theory’, J. Math. Phys. 28, 2440–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scheibe, E. (1991). EPR-Situation and Bell’s Inequality. In: Spohn, W., Van Fraassen, B.C., Skyrms, B. (eds) Existence and Explanation. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3244-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3244-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5430-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3244-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive