Skip to main content

Atomic Sentences as Singular Terms in Free Logic

  • Chapter
Book cover Existence and Explanation

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 49))

Abstract

In logic texts, it is generally assumed that verbs denote properties of, or relations among, individuals. This is in marked contrast to the common view that verbs stand for events, actions, or states. In this paper I explore the common view about verbs. This quickly turns into a revised view, according to which it is whole ‘atomic’ sentences (of English) that do the denoting, not just the verbs themselves. This is then most naturally formalized as if sentences of English were singular terms within a version of free logic, with the true ones successfully denoting events, and the false ones failing to denote.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. I assume that ‘name-filling’ is like quantification in that it can occur at any of various stages; this accounts for the fact that names, as well as quantifiers, have’ scope’. In a logic such as Quine’s version of Russell’s, names of natural language are represented by quantifiers; in a free logic they are not; in either case they need to have scope. The treatment of names is well-studied and debated; I do not pursue it here.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Plato says: “… we have two kinds of vocal indications of being. … One called nouns, the other verbs. … The indication which relates to action we may call a verb. … And the vocal sign applied to those who perform the actions in question we call a noun.” He goes on to refer to “… ‘walks’, ‘runs’,’ sleeps’ and the other verbs which denote actions.” Plato, Sophist 261D-262C.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suppose that Brutus imagines Caesar as a tyrant, and also simultaneously imagines him as a griffin. Then the sentence ‘Brutus imagined Caesar’ may give trouble. For the description ‘e is an imagining & Agent (e, Brutus) & Object (e, Caesar) & ehappens at fwill apparently not be individuating’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parsons, T. (1991). Atomic Sentences as Singular Terms in Free Logic. In: Spohn, W., Van Fraassen, B.C., Skyrms, B. (eds) Existence and Explanation. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3244-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3244-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5430-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3244-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics