Advertisement

Galen and Francis Bacon: Faculties of the Soul and the Classification of Knowledge

  • Grazia Tonelli Olivieri
Part of the Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas book series (ARCH, volume 124)

Abstract

The major focus of this paper is Bacon’s selection of three specific faculties of the soul (memory, imagination, reason) as classificatory principles, and more particularly the source of this classification.

Keywords

Classificatory Principle Latin Translation Enormous Success Opus Omnia Rational Soul 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Bacon, De Dignitate et Augmentis Scientiarum, 1.II, c. 1, in The Works, ed. Spedding-Ellis-Heath (New York-Cambridge, 1872), II, 186.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Julius Pacius, Aristotelis Stagiritae Peripateticorwn Principis Organum, hoc est, libri omnes ad Logicam pertinentes, Graece et Laune, editio secunda (Frankfurt, 1597), 545.Google Scholar
  3. 3a.
    Bernardino Telesio, in De rerum natura juxta propria principia (Naples, 1586; repr. Hildesheim, 1971), 1. VIII, c. 11, 326f.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Flury, “Phantasia und imaginatio in antiken Latein,” in Phantasia-Imaginatio (Atti del V Colloquio Internazionale del Lessico Intellettuale Europeo), ed. M. Fattori e M. Bianchi (Roma, 1988), 69–79Google Scholar
  5. 4a.
    P. Zambelli, “L’immaginazione e il suo potere. Da al-Kindi, al-Farabi, e Avicenna nel Medioevo Latino al Rinascimento,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia, XVII (1985), 188–206Google Scholar
  6. 4b.
    P. Cristofolini (ed.), Studi sul Seicento e sull’Immaginazione” (Pisa, 1985).Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    J. Freudenthal, Über den Begriff des Wortes φαντασι’α bei Aristoteles (Göttingen, 1863)Google Scholar
  8. 8a.
    H. Siebeck, Geschichte der Psychologie (Basel, 1879)Google Scholar
  9. 8b.
    A.E. Chaignet, Histoire de la Psychologie des Grecs (Paris, 1890)Google Scholar
  10. 8c.
    G. S. Brett, History of Psychology (London, 1921)Google Scholar
  11. 8d.
    M. W. Bundy, The Theory of Imagination in Classical and Mediaeval Thought (Urbana, 1927)Google Scholar
  12. 8e.
    J. R. Kantor, The Scientific Evolution of Psychology (Chicago, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 15.
    Augustinus Donius, De Natura Hominis libri duo (Basel, 1581), 1. II, c. 23, 120ff.Google Scholar
  14. 15a.
    N. C. van Deusen, Telesio: the First of the Modems (New York, 1932), 3ff.Google Scholar
  15. 15b.
    V. Giachetti Assenza, “Bernardino Telesio: il migliore dei moderni. I riferimenti a Telesio negli scritti di Francesco Bacone,” Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia, 35 (1980), 41–79.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. P. Walker, “Francis Bacon and Spiritus,” in Science, Medicine, and Society in the Renaissance, ed. A. Debus (New York, 1972), II, 121–130Google Scholar
  17. 16a.
    Enrico De Mas, Francesco Bacone da Verulamio: La Filosofia dell’Uomo (Torino, 1964), 65–101.Google Scholar
  18. 16b.
    G. Di Napoli, L’Immortalità dell’Animao nel Rinascimento (Turin, 1963), c. VIIIGoogle Scholar
  19. 16c.
    L. De Franco, L’eretico Agostino Doni, medico e filosofo cosentino del’500 (Cosenza, 1973).Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    Walker, “The Astral Body in Renaissance Medicine,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institute, 21 (1958), 119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 17a.
    Walker, “Medical Spirits and God and the Soul,” in Spiritus, atti del IV Colloquio Internazionale del Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, ed. M. Fattori e M. Bianchi (Roma, 1984), 222–244.Google Scholar
  22. 17b.
    L. Jardine, Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse (Cambridge, 1974), 88ff.Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    G. Rees, Francis Bacon’s Natural Philosophy: a New Source. A Transcription of Manuscript Hardwick 72A, with Translation and Commentary (London 1984, 33f.)Google Scholar
  24. 18a.
    G. Rees, “Francis Bacon’s Biological Ideas, a N w Manuscript source,” in B. Vickers (ed.), Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance (Cambridge, 1984), 297–314Google Scholar
  25. 18b.
    A. Clericuzio, “Spiritus vitalis, studio sulle teorie fisiologiche da Fernel a Boyle,” Nouvelles de la Republique des Lettres, 2 (1988), 33–84Google Scholar
  26. 18c.
    M. Bianchi, “Occulto e manifesto nella medicina del Renascimento: Jean Fernel e Pietro Severino,” Atti e Memorie dell’Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere La Colombara, XLVIII, N.S. XXIII (1982), 183–248Google Scholar
  27. 21.
    O. Temkin, Galenism, Rise and Decline of a Medical Philosophy (Ithaca, 1973), 54, 139.Google Scholar
  28. 23.
    Avicenna, Poème de la Medicine, Arabic text, French translation, and thirteenth century Latin translation..., ed. H. Jahier and A. Noureddine (Paris, 1956), 18, vv. 107–109.Google Scholar
  29. 25.
    L. Jardine, Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse (Cambridge, 1974), 89f.Google Scholar
  30. 32.
    G. Rees, “Francis Bacon’s Semi-Paracelsian Cosmology,” Ambix, 22 (1975), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 32a.
    A. G. Debus, “The Paracelsian Compromise in Elizabethan England,” Ambix, 8 (1960), 71–97Google Scholar
  32. 32b.
    W. Pagel, Paracelsus: an Introduction to Philosophical Medicine in the Era of the Renaissance (Basel, 1958).Google Scholar
  33. 38.
    R. E. Siegel, Galen on Psychology, Psychopathology, and Function and Diseases of the Nervous System (Basel, 1973)Google Scholar
  34. 39.
    P. O. Kristeller, “The School of Salerno,” Bull. Hist. Med., 1945, 17, 133–194Google Scholar
  35. 39a.
    J. Koch, ed., Artes Liberales: von der antiken Bildung zur Wissenschaft des Mittelalters (Leiden, 1959), 84–90.Google Scholar
  36. 40.
    Nemesius Emesenus, De natura hominis, c. IV, ed. C. F. Matthaei (Halle, 1802, repr. Hildesheim, 1967), 460.Google Scholar
  37. 40a.
    W.W. Jaeger, Nemesius von Emesa (Berlin, 1914)Google Scholar
  38. 44.
    Avicenna, Liber de Anima, sive sextus de Naturalibus, IV, 8, ed. Van Riet (Louvain-Leiden, 1968)Google Scholar
  39. 45.
    Averroës, Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis de Anima Libros, III, 6, 47–58, ed. F. Stuart Crawford (Cambridge, Mass., 1953)Google Scholar
  40. 48.
    Albertus Magnus, De Anima, II, 4, 8, in Opera Omnia, ed. Stroick (Münster, 1968), VII, 1, 158.Google Scholar
  41. 49.
    Bartholomaeus Anglicus, De proprietatibus rerum, 1. V, c. 3 (Frankfurt, 1601), 124f.Google Scholar
  42. 50.
    Ramon Llull, Libre de contemplació en Deu, 1. II, d. 31, c. 214, 19–20, in Obres Essencials (Barcelona, 1957), II, 630.Google Scholar
  43. 51.
    Gregorius Reisch, Margarita Philosophica (Freiburg, 1503)Google Scholar
  44. 51a.
    E. Clarke and K. Dewhurst, An Illustrated History of the Brain Function, (Berkeley, 1972).Google Scholar
  45. 52.
    Bernardus de Lavinheta, Practica compendiosa artis Raymundi Lulli, (Lyon, 1523), 1. VIII, f. 106r.Google Scholar
  46. 53.
    Johannes Romberch, Congestorium Artificiosae Memoriae (Venice, 1520)Google Scholar
  47. 53a.
    Lodovico Dolce, Dialogo nel quale si ragiona del modo di accrescere et conservare la memoria (Venice, 1586 [1552]Google Scholar
  48. 53b.
    Cosmas Rosellius, Thesaurus Artificiosae Memoriae (Venice, 1579), 138.Google Scholar
  49. 53c.
    F. A. Yates, The Art of Memory (London, 1966), 256.Google Scholar
  50. 54.
    W. Pagel, “Medieval and Renaissance Contributions to the Knowledge of the Brain and its Functions,” in F. N. L. Poynter (ed.), The History and Philosophy of the Brain and its Functions (Oxford, 1958), 112.Google Scholar
  51. 55.
    Philippus Melanchthon, De Anima (Witteberg, 1552), 585f.Google Scholar
  52. 56.
    Cornelius Valerius, Physicae seu Naturalis Philosophiae Institutiones (Marburg, 1593 [preface dated 1566]), 116ff.Google Scholar
  53. 56a.
    Joh. Nicolaus Stupanus, Theses εστροφιℓοσοφιχαί de facultatibus animae (Basel, 1596)Google Scholar
  54. 56b.
    K. Park, “The Organic Soul,” The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Ch. B. Schmitt (Cambridge, 1988), 464–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 58.
    Andreas Vesalius, De Humani Corporis Fabrica (Basel, 1543), 623f.Google Scholar
  56. 59.
    Johannes Argenterius, In Artem Medicinalem Galeni (Paris, 1578), I, 429ff.Google Scholar
  57. 60.
    A. Preus, Science and Philosophy in Aristotle’s Biological Works (Hildesheim, 1975), 114; 30.Google Scholar
  58. 61.
    Andreas Caesalpinus, Peripateticae Quaestiones (1571) (Venice, 1593).Google Scholar
  59. 62.
    Jacobus Zabarella, De Partitione Animae Liber, in De Rebus Naturalibus Libri XXX (Frankfurt, 1617)Google Scholar
  60. 63.
    Thomas Vicary, The Anatomie of the Bodie of Man (1548), ed. F. J. Furnivall and P. Furnivall (London, 1888), 30f.Google Scholar
  61. 65.
    Juan Huarte, Examen de Ingenios. The Examination of Men’s Wits (London, 1594), 54f.Google Scholar
  62. 65a.
    K. Wallace, Francis Bacon on the Nature of Man (Urbana, 1967), 68.Google Scholar
  63. 66.
    Helkiah Crooke, Microcosmographia: A Description of the Body of Man together with the Controversies thereto belonging (London, 1615), 503ff.Google Scholar
  64. 66a.
    John Davies of Hereford, Microcosmos.The Discovery of the Little World, with the Government thereof (Oxford, 1603), 216ff (in verse).Google Scholar
  65. 67.
    Robert Fludd, Utriusque Cosmi Maioris scilicet et Minoris, Metaphysica, Physica, atque Technica Historia (Oppenheim, 1617–1619).Google Scholar
  66. 68.
    K. Dewhurst, Thomas Willis as a Physician (Los Angeles, 1964).Google Scholar
  67. 69.
    M. Grabmann, Die Geschichte der scholastischen Methode [Berlin, 1956, first ed. 1909–11], II, 42f.)Google Scholar
  68. 69a.
    I. Maier, “Un inédit de Politien: la classification des arts,” Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 22 [1960], 343f.).Google Scholar
  69. 69b.
    P. O Kristeller, Studies in Renaissance Thought and Letters [Rome, 1969], 195)Google Scholar
  70. 69c.
    Johannes Arboreus (De philosophiae laudibus oratio, in: Compendiaria ⋯ in dialectica elementa introductio [Paris, 1533], 9ff.)Google Scholar
  71. 73.
    Gulielmus de Conchis, In Boëthium..., ed. Jourdain, Notices et extraits, XX, 2, 1862, 57–58.Google Scholar
  72. 74.
    Proclus, In primum Euclidis Elementorum librum Commentaria, prologus II, ed. Friedlein (Leipzig, 1873), 77–79.Google Scholar
  73. 75.
    Cornelius Gemma, De Arte Cyclognomica (Antwerp, 1569), I, 2; 27ff.Google Scholar
  74. 76.
    H.J. De Vleeshauwer, “Autour de la Classification Psychologique des Sciences. Juan Huarte-Francis Bacon-Pierre Charron-D’Alembert,” Mousaion, 27 (1958), 46.Google Scholar
  75. 77.
    Juan Huarte, Examen de Ingenios para las Ciencias (Buenos Aires, 1946), 105Google Scholar
  76. 77a.
    M. de Iriarte, El doctor Huarte de San Juan y su Examen de Ingenios (Madrid, 1948)Google Scholar
  77. 77b.
    G. Perouse, L’Examen des Esprits du Docteur Juan Huarte de San Juan. Sa diffusion et son influence en France au XVIe et XVIIe siècles (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
  78. 77c.
    E. Zilsel, Die Entstehung des Geniebegriffes (Tübingen, 1926), 190ff.; 249ff.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Pierre Charron, Toutes les Oeuvres (Paris, 1635), 1. I, c. 7–17, 21ff.Google Scholar
  80. 79a.
    Antonius Zara, Anatomia Ingeniorum et Scientiarum sectionibus quatuor comprehensa (Venice, 1615)Google Scholar
  81. 79b.
    J. B. Sabrie, De VHumanisme au Rationalisme: Pierre Charron (Paris, 1913).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grazia Tonelli Olivieri

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations