Advertisement

Abstract

The study of history was central to Renaissance learning both explicitly and implicitly—both as an ancient “art” raised to the level of a modern “science” and as a repository of cultural memory and instruction. My purpose here is to explore more specifically the way in which “history,” without losing its more general meaning (narrative description), came also to signify a particular mode of thought, or at least a way of organizing human experience, behavior, and learning in order to assert, to accommodate, or to change, contemporary priorities and values. In various ways the medieval Studium was transformed from a hierarchy into a historical process—from a structure into an adventure.1 The idea not of a ladder but rather of the advancement of learning illustrates what may be regarded as a historical recasting of the the classification of sciences, analogous to the “temporalizing” of the Great Chain of Being traced by Arthur O. Lovejoy more than half a century ago.2 The road from Vincent of Beauvais’s Speculum maior to Diderot’s Encyclopédie is hardly straight, but from our perspective the growing prominence of historical perspective and the idea of cultural progress seem undeniable.

Keywords

Intellectual History Human Spirit Christian Doctrine Human Idea German Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See especially Ulrich Dierse, Enzyklopädie: Zur Geschichte einer philosophischen und wissenschaftstheoretischen Begriffs (Bonn, 1977)Google Scholar
  2. 1a.
    Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggeman, Topica Universalis: Eine Modelgeschichte humanistischer und barocker Wissenschaft (Hamburg, 1983)Google Scholar
  3. 1b.
    Giorgio Tonelli, A Short-title Catalogue of Subject Dictionaries of the Sixteenth, Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries as Aids to the History of Ideas (London, 1971)Google Scholar
  4. 1c.
    Jean Bollack, “Vom System der Geschichte zur Geschichte der Systeme,” Geschichte-Ereignis und Erzählung, ed. Reinhart Koselleck and Wolf-Dieter Stempel (Munich, 1973), 11–28Google Scholar
  5. 1d.
    A. Diemer (ed.), Der Wissenschaftsbegriff: Historische und systematische Untersuchungen (Meisenheim, 1970)Google Scholar
  6. 1e.
    Robert Collinson, Encyclopedias: Their History Through the Ages (New York, 1964)Google Scholar
  7. 1f.
    Otto Ritschl, System und systematische Methode in der Geschichte der wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauchs und der philosophischen Methodogie (Bonn, 1906)Google Scholar
  8. 1g.
    Robert Flint, Philosophy as Scientia Scientiarum and a History of the Classification of the Sciences (New York, 1904)Google Scholar
  9. 1h.
    the classic essay by P. O. Kristeller, “The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 12 (1951), 496–527 (reprinted in Renaissance Thought II, [New York, 1965])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 1i.
    Wilhelm Dilthey, Introduction to the Human Sciences, ed. Rudolph Makreel and Frijhof Rodi (Princeton, 1989), 72–76Google Scholar
  11. 1j.
    Henri Ahrens, Encyclopédie juridique, tr. A. Chaufford (Paris, 1880 [1855]), 5, “An encyclopedia may be regarded in general as a synthetic plan embracing a science in all its parts.”Google Scholar
  12. 2.
    Lovejoy, Great Chain of Being (Cambridge, Mass., 1936)Google Scholar
  13. 2a.
    Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 1 (1940), 3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 2b.
    the recent comments by Daniel J. Wilson, Edward P. Mahoney, and Francis Oakley in ibid., 48 (1987), 187–263Google Scholar
  15. 2c.
    all now in D. R. Kelley (ed.), The History of Ideas (Rochester, 1990), 5–21, 158–212.Google Scholar
  16. 3.
    See D. R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect, Prospect,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 48 (1987), 143–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 3a.
    D. R. Kelley, “What Has Become of the History of Ideas?” ibid., 51 (1990), 3–25.Google Scholar
  18. 4.
    D. R. Kelley, “The Theory of History,” Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Quentin Skinner and Charles Schmitt (Cambridge, Eng., 1988), 746–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 5.
    Vives, De Tradendis disciplinis sive de doctrina, in Opera omnia (Valencia, 1782–90).Google Scholar
  20. 7.
    Budé, De Asse etpartibus eius (Paris, 1532), fol. 179Google Scholar
  21. 7a.
    D. R. Kelley, Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship (New York, 1970), 63–66.Google Scholar
  22. 8.
    De Transitu Hellenismi ad Christianismum (1535), also ed. M. Lebel (Sherbrook, 1973).Google Scholar
  23. 9.
    Le Roy, La Vicissitude ou varieté des chose en I’univers (Paris, 1575)Google Scholar
  24. 9a.
    Werner Gundersheimer, The Life and Works of Louis Le Roy (Geneva, 1967)Google Scholar
  25. 9b.
    Abel Lefranc, “De la traité De la vicissitude ou variété des choses de Louis Le Roy et sa veritable date,” Melanges Lanson (Paris, 1922).Google Scholar
  26. 16.
    Neal Ward Gilbert, Concepts of Method in the Renaissance and their Ancient and Medieval Antecedents (New York, 1956).Google Scholar
  27. 17.
    Giovanni Santinello et al. (ed.), Storia della storia della filosofia (Brescia, 1981).Google Scholar
  28. 18.
    Richard Rorty, “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres,” in Philosophy in History, ed. Richard Rorty, J.B. Schneewind, and Quentin Skinner (Cambridge, Eng., 1984), 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 19.
    Charles Nauert, Agrippa and the Crisis of Renaissance Thought (Urbana, 1965).Google Scholar
  30. 20.
    H. S. Harris’s review of vol. III in Journal of the History of Ideas, 51 (1990), 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 21.
    See Agostino Steuco, De prenni philosophia (Lyon, 1540).Google Scholar
  32. 21a.
    Charles Schmitt, Studies in Renaissance Philosophy and Science (London, 1981).Google Scholar
  33. 24.
    J. J. Brucker, Historia critica philosophiae (6 vols., Leipzig, 1766).Google Scholar
  34. 25.
    The translation of Brucker’s book published as William Enfield, The History of Philosophy (London, 1819), II, 468–469.Google Scholar
  35. 26.
    Heineccius, Elementa historiaephilosophiae (8th ed., Berlin, 1756 [1728]), 292.Google Scholar
  36. 27.
    Kant, Preisschrift uber die Fortschritte der Metaphysik, in Gesammelte Schriften (Berlin, 1942), XX, 264.Google Scholar
  37. 29.
    Vico, La Scienza nuova seconda, ed. F. Nicolini (Bari, 1953), 128 (par. 127)Google Scholar
  38. 29a.
    Brucker, Historia philosophia doctrinae de ideis (Augsburg, 1723).Google Scholar
  39. 30.
    Dugald Stewart, Historire abrégée des sciences metaphysiques, morales et politiques depuis la Renaissance des lettres, tr. J. Buchon (Paris, 1820), III, 369.Google Scholar
  40. 31.
    Frederick Beiser, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte (Cambridge, Mass., 1987), 153Google Scholar
  41. 31a.
    Goldfriedrich, Die historischen Ideenlehre in Deutschland (Berlin, 1902).Google Scholar
  42. 32.
    Herder, Metakritik, in Sammtliche Werke, XXXVII (Stuttgart, 1853), 17.Google Scholar
  43. 33.
    A.F. Bourreau-Deslandes, Histoire critique de la philosophie ou I’on traite de son origine, de ses progrés, et des diverses Révolutions qui lui sont arivées jusqu’ à notre terns (Amsterdam, 1737).Google Scholar
  44. 35.
    K. L. Reinhold, “Uber den Begriff der Geschichte der Philosophie,” Beyträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie, ed. G. G. Fulleborn (Zullichau, 1791), 21Google Scholar
  45. 35a.
    A. Y. Goguet, De I’Origine des lois, des arts et des sciences (Paris, 1758)Google Scholar
  46. 35b.
    Lutz Geldsetzer, Die Philosophie der Philosophiegeschichte im 19. Jahrhundert (Meisenheim, 1968)Google Scholar
  47. 35c.
    Martial Guéroult, Histoire de Vhistoire de la philosophie, 3 vols. (Paris, 1984–88)Google Scholar
  48. 35d.
    The semantic history of the term Spiritus (Lessico intelletuale europeo, XXXII, ed. M. Fattori and M. Bianchi, Rome, 1984).Google Scholar
  49. 36.
    Carus, Ideen zur Geschichte der Philosophie (Leipzig, 1809), 110.Google Scholar
  50. 37.
    D’Alembert, Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, tr. Richard N. Schwab (Indianapolis, 1963)Google Scholar
  51. 37a.
    Grazia Tonelli Olivieri, “Per una storia della classificazione delle scienze: Il ’Prospectus’ dell ’Encyclopedie’ ” Studi e ricerche di storia della filosofia, 103 (1977).Google Scholar
  52. 39.
    J. Laveaux of Meiners’s work, Histoire de l’origine, des progrès et de la décadence des sciences dans la Grece (Paris, an VII [1800]), I.Google Scholar
  53. 40.
    Meiners, Historiesche Vergleichung der Sitten und Gewerbe, des Handels, und der Religionen, der Wissenschaften, und Lehranstalten des Mittelalters mit denen unsers Jahrhunderts in Rücksicht auf die Vortheile und Nachtheile der Aufklärung (Hanover, 1793), III, 465.Google Scholar
  54. 41.
    Degérando, Histoire comparée des systémes de la philosophie (Paris, 1847), I, xvi.Google Scholar
  55. 43.
    Tennemann, Manuel de l’histoire de la philosophie (Paris, 1839), I, 36.Google Scholar
  56. 44.
    Cousin, Cours de l’histoire de la philosophie moderne (Paris, 1843).Google Scholar
  57. 45.
    Lerminier, De l’ Influence de la philosophie du XVIIIe siécle sur la léislation et la sociabilité du XIXe (Paris, 1833), xvGoogle Scholar
  58. 45a.
    Bonnie Smith, “The Rise and Fall of Eugene Lerminier,” French Historical Studies, 2 (1982), 145–153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald R. Kelley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations