Skip to main content

Determiners in NP and DP

  • Chapter
Views on Phrase Structure

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 25))

Abstract

Common nouns in English differ from proper names in that they typically occur with a preceding determiner:

  1. (1)
    1. a.

      John met the president of a mining company yesterday

    2. b.

      *The John met the president of a mining company yesterday

    3. c.

      *John met the president of mining company yesterday

    4. d.

      *John met president of a mining company yesterday

  2. (2)
    1. a.

      Bill’s brother worked on one aspect of this problem

    2. b.

      *Brother worked on one aspect of this problem

    3. c.

      *Bill’s brother worked on aspect of this problem

    4. d.

      *Bill’s brother worked on one aspect of problem

  3. (3)
    1. a.

      Which man did every senator introduce to Dick Nixon?

    2. b.

      *Which man did senator introduce to Dick Nixon?

    3. c.

      *Which man did every senator introduce to the Dick Nixon?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abney, Steven: 1986, ‘Functional Elements and Licensing’, MS, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abney, Steven: 1987, The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1985, Incorporation as a Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan: 1972, Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Richard: 1989, The Grammatical Structure of Verbal Predicates. Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1970, ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Robin: 1986, Boundaries and the Treatment of Control, Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggie, Laurie: 1988, The Syntax of Copular Structures, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1987, ‘Tndefinitencss and Predication’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 43–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, Norbert: 1977,’s and X-bar Convention’, Linguistic Analysis 3, 137–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1977, X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert: 1977, The Grammar of Quantification, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas: 1986, ‘Implicit Arguments, Implicit Roles, and Subject/Object Asymmetry in Morphological Rules’, MS, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Tim: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Tim: 1983, ’subjects Across Categories’, The Linguistic Review 2, 285–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Tim: 1989, ’subjects, Specifiers, and X-bar Theory’, in M. Baltin and A. Kroch (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Tim: 1991, ’small Clause Restructuring’, in R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrego, Esther: 1986, ‘On Empty Categories in Nominals’. MS, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stowell, T. (1991). Determiners in NP and DP. In: Leffel, K., Bouchard, D. (eds) Views on Phrase Structure. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3196-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3196-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5409-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3196-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics