Advertisement

The Roman Catholic Tradition and Bioethics

  • Joseph Boyle
Chapter
Part of the Bioethics Yearbook book series (BIYB, volume 1)

Abstract

Roman Catholic writing on bioethics comprises an extensive and sprawling body of literature authored not only by established authorities such as popes, bishops, and their advisors, but also by a considerable body of theologians and philosophers who may or may not have official positions within the Church. What distinguishes this literature from other bioethical writing is its explicit dependence on the Roman Catholic moral tradition. This dependence usually involves acceptance of large parts of received Roman Catholic teaching and use of the categories of moral analysis developed within the tradition. But it frequently involves criticism, refinement, and development of traditional teaching on some points.

Keywords

Human Remains Persistent Vegetative State Abort Fetus Artificial Reproduction Positive Obligation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Bishops of Florida: 1989, “Treatment of Dying Patients”, Origins, 19, 47–48.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bishops of Texas: 1990, “On Withdrawing Artificial Nutrition and Hydration”, Origins 20, 53–55.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bone, E.: 1990, “Les Greffes Intracerebrales de Tissu Foetal”, Revue theologique de Louvain 21, 311–328.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyle, J.: 1988, “An Introduction to the Vatican Instruction on Reproductive Technologies”, Linacre Quarterly 55: 1, 20–28.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyle, J.: 1989, “Does the Benefit Outweigh the Burden in the Artificial Provision of Nutrition and Hydration? Affirmative Position”, in R. Smith (ed.), Critical Issues in Contemporary Health Care, The Pope John Center, Braintree, Massachusetts, pp. 60–69.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyle, P.: 1989, “Does the Benefit Outweigh the Burden in the Artificial Provision of Nutrition and Hydration? Negative Position”, in R. Smith (ed.), Critical Issues in Contemporary Health Care, The Pope John Center, Braintree, Massachusetts, pp. 70–77.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burtchaell, J.: 1989, The Giving and Taking of Life, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burtchaell, J.: 1988, “University Policy on Experimental Use of Aborted Fetal Tissue”, IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 10:4, 7–11.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: 1980, “Declaration on Euthanasia”, Origins 10, 154–157.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: 1987, “Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation”, Origins 16, 697–711.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dilanni, A.: 1989, “Volunteering Children for Medical Experiments”, Linacre Quarterly 56: 1, 30–38.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ford, N.: 1988, When Did I Begin? Conception of the Human Individual in History, Philosophy and Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gelineau, L.: 1988a, “On Removing Nutrition and Water From Comatose Woman”, Origins 17, 545, 547.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gelineau, L.: 1988b, “Statement After Judge’s Decision on Medical Case”, Origins 18, 340–341.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grisez, G.: 1990, “When Do People Begin?”, in L. Shrenk (ed.), The Ethics of Having Children: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 63, 27–47.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grisez, G.: 1990, “Should Nutrition and Hydration Be Provided to Permanently Comatose and Other Mentally Disabled Patients?”, Linacre Quarterly 57: 2, 30–43.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grisez, G., et al.: 1988,“Every Marital Act Ought to Be Open to New Life’: Toward A Clearer Understanding”, The Thomist 52,365–426.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grondelski, J.: 1989, “Removal of Artificially Supplied Nutrition and Hydration: A Moral Analysis”, Irish Theological Quarterly 55, 291–302.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hannon, P.: 1989, “In Vitro Fertilization”, Irish Theological Quarterly 55, 7–17.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnstone, B.: 1988, “The Instruction Donum vitae and Its Reception”, Studia Moralia 26, 209–229.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiely, B.: 1989, “Contraception, In Vitro Fertilization and the Principle of Inseparability”, Linacre Quarterly 56: 2, 68–75.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marcus, E., et al.: 1987, “European Reactions to the Document”, Hospital Progress, July/August, 56–65.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    May, W.: 1988, “The Simple Case of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer”, Linacre Quarterly 55: 1, 29–36.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    May, W.: 1990, “Catholic Teaching on the Laboratory Generation of Human Life”, in M. Wallace and T. Hilgers (eds.), The Gift of Life: The Proceedings of a National Conference on the Vatican Instruction on Reproductive Ethics and Technology, Pope Paul Institute Press, Omaha, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    May, W.: 1990, “Criteria for Withholding or Withdrawing Treatment”, Linacre Quarterly 57: 3, 81–90.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCormick, R.: 1989, The Critical Calling: Reflections on Moral Dilemmas Since Vatican II, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McDonnell, K.: 1990, “Volunteering Children”, in L. Shrenk (ed.), The Ethics of Having Children: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 63, 182–192.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McHugh, J.: 1989, “Artificially Assisted Nutrition and Hydration”, Origins 19, 314–316.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    O’Rourke, K.: 1988, “Evolution of Church Teaching on Prolonging Life”, Health Progress 8: 1, 29–35.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    O’Rourke, K.: 1989, “Should Nutrition and Hydration be Provided to Permanently Unconscious and Other Mentally Disabled Persons?”, Issues in Law and Medicine 5, 181–196.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    O’Rourke, K.: 1989, “Father Kevin O’Rourke on Hydration and Nutrition: An Open Letter to Bishop McHugh”, Origins 19, 351–352.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pius XII: 1958, “The Prolongation of Life”, The Pope Speaks 4, 393–398, also in Acta Apostolicae Sedis 49 (November 24, 1957), 1027–1033.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shannon, T., and L. Cahill: 1988, Religion and Artificial Reproduction, Crossroad, New York.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shannon, T., and J. Walter: 1988, “The PVS Patient and the Forgoing/Withholding of Medical Nutrition and Hydration”, Theological Studies 49, 623–647.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sparks, R.: 1988, To Treat or Not to Treat? Bioethics and the Handicapped Newborn, Paulist Press, Mahwah.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sulmasy, D: 1989, “By Whose Authority? Emerging Issues in Medical Ethics”, Theological Studies 50, 95–119.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sutton, A.: 1990, Prenatal Diagnosis: Confronting the Ethical Issues, The Linacre Centre, London.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tonti-Filippini, N.: 1989, “A Critical Note”, Linacre Quarterly 56: 3, 36–50.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vacek, E.: 1988, “Notes on Moral Theology: Vatican Instruction on Reproductive Technology”, Theological Studies 49, 110–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Boyle
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Michael’s College Centre for BioethicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations