Abstract
In the market for natural gas in Europe, negotiations play an important role in the determination of terms of trade between various agents. Due to the small number of countries involved in the trade of nautral gas on the European continent, this market could be characterized as a ‘bilateral oligopoly’. As trade between a buyer and a seller can be implemented only if the parties make investments in relationship-specific infrastructure (pipelines and terminals), the agents, once these investments have been undertaken, are locked into a bilateral monopoly position. Since the parties cannot rely on the market once the investments are undertaken, a trade agreement is usually governed by a long-term contract, established between a selling country (or a national enterprise) and a buyer, which is normally a transmission company, reselling gas to local distribution companies in various regions. Long-term contracts will not only regulate trade between upstream suppliers and transmission companies; such contracts are also prevalent in regulating trade between transmission companies and downstream firms, such as local distribution companies. Hence, there is no ordinary spot market for natural gas, but a set of segmented or geographically separated markets, where terms of trade are determined in a complex interrelated bargaining game comprising upstream as well as downstream agents. Within such a market structure, a transmission company has a rather strong market power, as a player ‘in between’ the upstream suppliers and the downstream buyers; for further details, see Bjerkholt, Gjelsvik and Olsen (1989).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bjerkholt, O., Gjelsvik, E. and Olsen, Ø. (1989) Gas trade and demand in Northwest Europe: regulation, bargaining and competition, Discussion Paper; no. 45, Central Bureau of Statistics, Oslo, Norway.
Dixit, A. (1983) Vertical integration in a monopolistically competitive industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1, 63–78.
Dixit, A. and Stern, N. (1982) Oligopoly and welfare. A unified presentation with applications to trade and development. European Economic Review, 19, 123–143.
Friedman, J.W. (1986) Game Theory with Applications to Economics, Oxford University Press.
Golombek, R. and Vislie, J. (1985) On bilateral monopoloy — a Nash—Wicksell approach, Memorandum from Department of Economics, University of Oslo, 23 January.
Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. D. (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691–719.
Hoel, M. and Strom, S. (1987) Supply security and import diversification of natural gas, in Natural Gas Markets and Contracts (eds R. Golombek, M. Hoel and J. Vislie), Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 151–72.
Hoel, M. and Vislie, J. (1987) Bargaining, bilateral monopoly and exhaustible resources, in Natural Gas Markets and Contracts (eds R. Golombek, M. Hoel and J. Vislie), Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 253–65.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vislie, J. (1990). Bargaining, vertical control, and (de)regulation in the European gas market. In: Bjerkholt, O., Olsen, Ø., Vislie, J. (eds) Recent Modelling Approaches in Applied Energy Economics. International Studies in Economic Modelling. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3088-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3088-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5368-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3088-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive