Skip to main content

A Classical Liberal Critique of Takings Law: A Struggle Between Individualist and Communitarian Norms

  • Chapter
Taking Property and Just Compensation

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 26))

  • 248 Accesses

Abstract

Law, like economics, is an evolutionary process of ongoing discourse in which new norms emerge from prior norms. It is a continuous process of dynamic change with conflict and competition between alternative conceptions of the “good,” “fair,” and “just” society. On this ever-changing landscape of legal evolution one needs to find a contextual foundation for critical commentary and interspection. Classical liberal theory forms the basis of my critique of law and in particular of the takings issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Epstein, R. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1983. Bright Promises, Dismal Performance, ed. W. Allen. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1984. Tyranny of the Status Quo. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1987. “Free Markets and Free Speech.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 10(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., and Friedman, R. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1980. Free to Choose. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John N, Gray. 1982. “F.A. Hayek and the Rebirth of Classical Liberalism.” Literature of Liberty 5:19–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 1952. The Counter-Revolutions of Science—Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 1976. The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 1979. The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. 1943. The Discovery Of Freedom—Man’s Struggle Against Authority. New York: Laissez Fair Books, The John Day Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1986. “Equating Human Rights and Property Rights—The Need for Moral Judgment in an Economic Analysis of Law and Social Policy. Ohio State Law Journal 47(1): 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1987. “The Political Economy of Co-financing America’s Urban Renaissance.” Vanderbilt Law Review 40(1):67–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1988a. “The Merits of the Smithian Critique: A Final Word on Smith and Posner.” Kansas Law Review 36(2):267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1988b. “Market Philosophy in the Legal Tension Between Children’s Autonomy and Parental Authority.” Indiana Law Review 21(4):889-900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1988c. “Invisible Hand or Sleight of Hand? Adam Smith, Richard Posner and the Philosophy of Law and Economics.” Kansas Law Review 36(2):209–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1990a. “Is Law and Economics Moral? Humanistic Economics and a Classical Liberal Critique of Posner’s Economic Analysis. Valparaiso University Law Review 24(2): 147–1

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1990b. “A Sign of the Times—Law and Semiotics.” Tulane Law Review 65(1):211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1990c. Law and Economics: A Comparative Approach to Theory and Practice. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1990d. “The Limits of “Science” in Legal Discourse.” Valparaiso University Law Review 24(2): 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1990e. “Of Icons, Metaphors and Private Property—the Recognition of “Welfare” Claims in the Philosophy of Adam Smith.” In Law and Semiotics, vol. III, ed. R. Kevelson. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1991a. Planning for Serfdom: Legal Economic Discourse and Downtown Development. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R. 1991b. “Towards a New Discourse of Law and Economics.” Syracuse Law Review 42:27–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R., and Evensky, J. Forthcoming.Adam Smith and the Philosophy of Law and Economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nock, A. 1983. Our Enemy, the State. Delevan, WI: Hallberg Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozik, R. 1968. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1976a. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. E. West. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1976b. The Wealth of Nations, ed. E. Cannon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1978. Lectures on Jurisprudence, eds. R. Meek, D. Raphael, and L. Stein. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1980. Essays and Philosophical Subjects, ed. W.P.D. Wightman. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Executive Office of the President. 1988. Exec. Order No. 12632, “Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.” Federal Register 53 (March):8859–8862.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Malloy, R.P. (1992). A Classical Liberal Critique of Takings Law: A Struggle Between Individualist and Communitarian Norms. In: Mercuro, N. (eds) Taking Property and Just Compensation. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2958-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2958-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5313-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2958-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics