Skip to main content

Plural Rationalities: The Rudiments of a Practical Science of the Inchoate

  • Chapter
Environmental Concerns

Abstract

  1. 1.

    Environmental debates reflect the existence of plural rationalities; sets of convictions about the nature of the world we live in that are fundamentally contradictory and that generate different definitions both of the environmental problems we face and of the solutions that are available to us.

  2. 2.

    These rationalities are linked to particular forms of social organisation — markets, hierarchies, egalitarian groups and excluded margins — all of which, in varying strengths and patterns of alliance, are the inescapable features of any society.

  3. 3.

    To be effective, environmental decision making must take constructive account of these rationalities.

Examples of this approach include: liquefied gas terminal siting, Himalayan deforestation, hazardous waste management, global energy futures, oil and gas reserves estimation, the health effects of low level radiation, and mass housing.

This paper summarises a line of argument that is set out in two recently published books: Schwarz and Thompson (1990) and Thompson, Ellis and Wildavsky (1990). The development of this argument in terms of varieties of uncertainty, was supported by the British Economic and Social Research Council (award reference number w 100311002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Caputo, R. (1981), The role of risk perception in establishing a rational energy policy for W.Europe. In Risk: A Seminar Series (H. Kunreuther, ed.), pp. 483–514. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A2361 Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1978), Cultural Bias. London, Royal Anthropological Institute (Occasional Paper No. 35).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1982), Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, M. (1984), The listing and classifying of hazardous wastes. Working Paper 84-26, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A2361 Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. and Rayner, S. (1985), Measuring Culture. New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. (1979), Myths of ecological stability. In Studies in Crisis Management (G. Smart and W. Stansbury, eds.) Montreal: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. (1986), The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems. In Sustainable Development of the Biosphere (W. Clark and R. Munn, eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, J.D., Messerli, B. and Thompson, M. (1987), Research strategy for the Himalayan region. Mountain Research and Development 7,3: 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives, J.D. and Messerli, B. (1989), The Himalayan Dilemma: Reconciling Development and Conservation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keepin, B. (1984), A technical appraisal of the IIASA energy scenarios. Policy Sciences 17,3: 199–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E. (1977), Politics and Markets. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, C. and Lathrop, J. (1983), LEG risk assessment: experts disagree. In Risk Analysis and Decision Processes (H.C. Kunreuther et al.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanz, J.J. Jr. (1978), Oil and gas resources: welcome to uncertainty. Resources 58. Reprinted in Wildavsky and Tenenbaum (1981), pp. 327-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapiro, M.H. (1988), Judicial selection and the design of clumsy institutions. Southern Californian Law Review 61, 6: 1555–1569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, M. and Thompson, M. (1990), Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (1979), Rubbish Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hompson, M. (1983), A cultural basis for comparison. In Risk Analysis and Decision Processes (H.C. Kunreuther et al.). Berlin, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (1984), Among the energy tribes: a cultural framework for the analysis and design of energy policy. Policy Sciences 17,3: 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (1986), Hazardous waste: what is it? Can we ever know? If we can’t does it matter? In Safety Evaluation and Regulation of Chemicals III (F. Homburger, ed.). Basel: Karger, pp. 230–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (1987a), The management of hazardous wastes and the hazards of wasteful management. In Waste Through the Ages (W. Schenkel, ed.). München: Verlag J. Jehle. Republished (1990) in Bradley, H (editor) Dirty Words: Writings on the History and Culture of Pollution. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (1987b), Welche Gesellschaftsklassen sind potent genug, anderen ihre Zukunft aufzuoktroyieren? Und wie geht das vor sich? In Design der Zukunft (L. Burckhardt, ed.). Berlin: International Design Centre/Dumont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R. and Wildavsky, A. (1990), Cultural Theory. Boulder Co: West View.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Hatley, T. and Warburton, M. (1987), Uncertainty on a Himalayan Scale. London: Milton Ash, Ethnographica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, P. (1986), Mythology and surprise in the sustainable development of the biosphere. In Sustainable Development of the Biosphere (W. Clark and R. Munn, eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958), The Protestant Ethic and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. and Tenenbaum, E. (1981), The Politics of Mistrust: Estimating American Oil and Gas Resources. Beverley Hill: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A. (1972), Science and trans-science. Minerva 10: 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (1984), The institutional context of science, models and policy: the IIASA energy study. Policy Sciences 17.3: 277–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (1988), Risk Management and Hazardous Waste: Implementation and the Dialectics of Credibility. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, M. (1991). Plural Rationalities: The Rudiments of a Practical Science of the Inchoate. In: Hansen, J.A. (eds) Environmental Concerns. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2904-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2904-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5291-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2904-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics