Abstract
-
1.
Environmental debates reflect the existence of plural rationalities; sets of convictions about the nature of the world we live in that are fundamentally contradictory and that generate different definitions both of the environmental problems we face and of the solutions that are available to us.
-
2.
These rationalities are linked to particular forms of social organisation — markets, hierarchies, egalitarian groups and excluded margins — all of which, in varying strengths and patterns of alliance, are the inescapable features of any society.
-
3.
To be effective, environmental decision making must take constructive account of these rationalities.
Examples of this approach include: liquefied gas terminal siting, Himalayan deforestation, hazardous waste management, global energy futures, oil and gas reserves estimation, the health effects of low level radiation, and mass housing.
This paper summarises a line of argument that is set out in two recently published books: Schwarz and Thompson (1990) and Thompson, Ellis and Wildavsky (1990). The development of this argument in terms of varieties of uncertainty, was supported by the British Economic and Social Research Council (award reference number w 100311002).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Caputo, R. (1981), The role of risk perception in establishing a rational energy policy for W.Europe. In Risk: A Seminar Series (H. Kunreuther, ed.), pp. 483–514. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A2361 Laxenburg, Austria.
Douglas, M. (1978), Cultural Bias. London, Royal Anthropological Institute (Occasional Paper No. 35).
Douglas, M. (1982), Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Dowling, M. (1984), The listing and classifying of hazardous wastes. Working Paper 84-26, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A2361 Laxenburg, Austria.
Gross, J. and Rayner, S. (1985), Measuring Culture. New York, Columbia University Press.
Holling, C.S. (1979), Myths of ecological stability. In Studies in Crisis Management (G. Smart and W. Stansbury, eds.) Montreal: Butterworth.
Holling, C.S. (1986), The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems. In Sustainable Development of the Biosphere (W. Clark and R. Munn, eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ives, J.D., Messerli, B. and Thompson, M. (1987), Research strategy for the Himalayan region. Mountain Research and Development 7,3: 332–344.
Ives, J.D. and Messerli, B. (1989), The Himalayan Dilemma: Reconciling Development and Conservation. London: Routledge.
Keepin, B. (1984), A technical appraisal of the IIASA energy scenarios. Policy Sciences 17,3: 199–276.
Lindblom, C.E. (1977), Politics and Markets. New York: Basic.
Mandl, C. and Lathrop, J. (1983), LEG risk assessment: experts disagree. In Risk Analysis and Decision Processes (H.C. Kunreuther et al.). Berlin: Springer.
Schanz, J.J. Jr. (1978), Oil and gas resources: welcome to uncertainty. Resources 58. Reprinted in Wildavsky and Tenenbaum (1981), pp. 327-358.
Schapiro, M.H. (1988), Judicial selection and the design of clumsy institutions. Southern Californian Law Review 61, 6: 1555–1569.
Schwarz, M. and Thompson, M. (1990), Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Thompson, M. (1979), Rubbish Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hompson, M. (1983), A cultural basis for comparison. In Risk Analysis and Decision Processes (H.C. Kunreuther et al.). Berlin, Springer.
Thompson, M. (1984), Among the energy tribes: a cultural framework for the analysis and design of energy policy. Policy Sciences 17,3: 321–339.
Thompson, M. (1986), Hazardous waste: what is it? Can we ever know? If we can’t does it matter? In Safety Evaluation and Regulation of Chemicals III (F. Homburger, ed.). Basel: Karger, pp. 230–236.
Thompson, M. (1987a), The management of hazardous wastes and the hazards of wasteful management. In Waste Through the Ages (W. Schenkel, ed.). München: Verlag J. Jehle. Republished (1990) in Bradley, H (editor) Dirty Words: Writings on the History and Culture of Pollution. London: Earthscan.
Thompson, M. (1987b), Welche Gesellschaftsklassen sind potent genug, anderen ihre Zukunft aufzuoktroyieren? Und wie geht das vor sich? In Design der Zukunft (L. Burckhardt, ed.). Berlin: International Design Centre/Dumont.
Thompson, M., Ellis, R. and Wildavsky, A. (1990), Cultural Theory. Boulder Co: West View.
Thompson, M., Hatley, T. and Warburton, M. (1987), Uncertainty on a Himalayan Scale. London: Milton Ash, Ethnographica.
Timmerman, P. (1986), Mythology and surprise in the sustainable development of the biosphere. In Sustainable Development of the Biosphere (W. Clark and R. Munn, eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, M. (1958), The Protestant Ethic and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Wildavsky, A. and Tenenbaum, E. (1981), The Politics of Mistrust: Estimating American Oil and Gas Resources. Beverley Hill: Sage.
Williamson, O. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
Weinberg, A. (1972), Science and trans-science. Minerva 10: 209–222.
Wynne, B. (1984), The institutional context of science, models and policy: the IIASA energy study. Policy Sciences 17.3: 277–320.
Wynne, B. (1988), Risk Management and Hazardous Waste: Implementation and the Dialectics of Credibility. London: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, M. (1991). Plural Rationalities: The Rudiments of a Practical Science of the Inchoate. In: Hansen, J.A. (eds) Environmental Concerns. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2904-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2904-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5291-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2904-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive