Advertisement

Finiteness and Verb Placement in Early Child Grammars: Evidence from Simultaneous Acquisition of French and German in Bilinguals

  • Jürgen M. Meisel
  • Natascha Müller
Part of the Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics book series (SITP, volume 16)

Abstract

Early child language exhibits a number of properties, e.g. a lack of case and agreement markings, word order patterns deviating from the adult norm, etc., which seem to indicate that child grammars differ in crucial ways from their adult counterparts. This observation might lead to the conclusion that child grammars do not conform to the principles of Universal Grammar (UG) which, according to linguistic theory, shape the grammars of natural languages. Although it is conceivable that these principles are subject to maturation, it is preferable to first explore explanations which will account for the noted particularities of child language without forcing us to assume a difference in kind between developing and mature grammars.

Keywords

Embed Clause Main Clause Bilingual Child Subordinate Clause Universal Grammar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bickerton, D.: 1981, Roots of Language, Karoma, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N.: 1989, ’some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, MIT Working Papers in linguistics 10, 43–74.Google Scholar
  5. Clahsen, H.: 1982, Spracherwerb in der Kindheit. Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern, Narr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  6. Clahsen, H.: 1989,’ Zur Analyse einiger Erscheinungen aus der Kindersprache im Rahmen der GB-Theorie’, ms., University of Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  7. Dieck, M.: 1989,’ Zum Erwerb der Negation bei bilingualen Kindern (Französisch/Deutsch). Eine Fallstudie’, M.A. thesis, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  8. Diesing, M.: 1990:, ’Verb movement and the subject position in Yiddish’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8,41–79.Google Scholar
  9. Fritzenschaft, A., I. Gawlitzek-Maiwald, R. Tracy, and S. Winkter: 1989, ‘Wege zur komplexen Syntax’, unpublished report of DFG-project, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  10. Fritzenschaft, A., I. Gawlitzek-Maiwald, R. Tracy, and S. Winkter: 1990, ’Der Erwerb der komplexen Syntax im Kinderalter’, research report, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
  11. Fukui, N.: 1986, ‘A theory of category projection and its applications’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Guilfoyle, E. and M. Noonan: 1988, ‘Functional categories and language acquisition’, paper presented at the Conference of Language Development, Boston University.Google Scholar
  13. Hyams, N.: 1986, Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  14. Jaeggli, O. and N. Hyams: 1987, ‘Morphological uniformity and the setting of the Null Subject Parameter’, ms., Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  15. Kaiser, G. and J. M. Meisel: 1991, ’subjekte und Null-Subjekte im Französischen’, G. Fanselow and S. Olsen (eds.), DET. COMP und INFL, Niemeyer, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  16. Koehn, C.: 1989, ‘Der Erwerb der Pluralmarkierungen durch bilinguale Kinder (Französisch/Deutsch)’ M.A. thesis, University of Hamburg, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  17. Koopman, H. and C. Lefebvre: 1981, ‘Haitian Creole pu’, P. Musyken (ed.), Generative Studies on Creole Languages, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Koopman, H. and C. Lefebvre: 1982, ‘Pu: marqueur de mode, préposition et complémenteur’, C. Lefebvre and H. Magloire-Holly, and N. Piou (eds.), Syntaxe de l’Hailien, Karoma, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  19. Kuroda, S.Y.: 1988, ‘Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Iapanese’. Lingvisticae Investigationes 12, 1–47.Google Scholar
  20. Meisel, J.: 1985, ‘Les phases initiales du développement de notions temporelles, aspectuelles et de modes d‘action‘. Lingua 66,321–374.Google Scholar
  21. Meisel, J.: 1989, ‘Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children’, K. Hyltenstam and L. Obler (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity, and Loss, Cambridge UP, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Meisel, J.: 1990, ‘INFL-ection: Subjects and subject-verb agreement’, in J.M. Meisel (ed.), Two First Languages. Early Grammatical Development in Bilingual Children, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  23. Meisel, J.: (to appear), ‘Verbal functional categories in early grammatical development’, ms., University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  24. Müller, N.: 1990, ‘Erwerb der Wortstellung im Französischen und Deutschen. Zur Distribution von Finitheitsmerkmalen in der Grammatik bilingualer Kinder’, in M. Rothweiler (ed.), Spracherwerb und Grammatik. linguistische Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Syntax und Morphologie, Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 3, Westdeutscher Verlag, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  25. Müller, N.: 1991. ‘Komplexe Sätze: Der Erwerb von COMP und von Wortstellungsmustern bei bilingualen Kindern (Französisch/Deutsch)’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  26. Parodi, T.: 1990, ‘The acquisition of word order regularities and case morphology’, J.M. Meisel (ed.), Two First Languages. Early Grammatical Development in Bilingual Children, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  27. Platzack, C. and A. Holmberg: 1989, ‘The role of AGR and finiteness in Germanic VO languages’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 43,51–76.Google Scholar
  28. Pollock. J.-Y.: 1989, ‘Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
  29. Radford, A.: 1986, ’small children’s small clauses’, Bangor Research Papers in linguistics 1, 1–38.Google Scholar
  30. Radford, A.: 1987, ‘The acquisition of the complementiser system’, Bangor Research Papers in linguistics 2, 55–76.Google Scholar
  31. Rizzi, L.: 1991, Paper presented at the Glow workshop on Language Acquisition, Leiden.Google Scholar
  32. Rizzi, L. and I. Roberts: 1989, ‘Complex inversion in French’, Probus 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
  33. Roberge, Y. and M.-T. Vinet 1989, La variation dialectale en grammaire universelle, Les Presses de l’Université de Montreal, Montréal.Google Scholar
  34. Roeper, T.: 1990, ‘How the least effro concept applies to the acquisition of head movement, copying, and cyclic wh-movement’, ms., University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  35. Roeper, T. and J. de Villiers: 1989, ‘Ordered parameters in the acquisition of wh-questions’, to appear in: H. Goodluck, J. Weissenborn, and T. Roeper (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Language Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.Google Scholar
  36. Rothweiler, M.: 1989, ‘Nebensatzerwerb im Deutschen. Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Primärspracherwerb’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
  37. Schlyter, S.: 1990, ‘The acquisition of tense and aspect’, in J.M. Meisel (ed.), Two First Languages. Early Grammatical Development in Bilingual Children, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  38. Stern, C. and W. Stern: 1928, Die Kindersprache, Leipzig, (reprint Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1975).Google Scholar
  39. Taraldsen, K.T.: 1986, ’som and the binding theory’, in L. Hellan and K. Koch Christensen (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  40. Valian, V.: 1990, Syntactic Subjects in the Early Speech of American and Italian Children, Hunter College, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Washabaugh, W.: 1975, ‘On the development of complementizers in creolization’, Working Papers in umguage Universals 17.Google Scholar
  42. Weissenborn, J. and M. Verrips: 1989, ‘Negation as a window to the structure of early child language’, ms., Max-Planck-Institut für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  43. Woolford, E.: 1979, ’The developing complementizer system of Tok Pisin: Syntactic change in progress’, K.C. Hili (ed.), The Genesis of Language, Karoma. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen M. Meisel
  • Natascha Müller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations