Skip to main content

The Acquisition of the Morphosyntax of Finite Verbs in English

  • Chapter
The Acquisition of Verb Placement

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 16))

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs by monolingual children acquiring British English as their first language. The primary data are drawn from a large naturalistic sample of more than 100,000 early child utterances (based on the corpus of 39 cross-sectional and 94 longitudinal studies described in Radford, 1990a:11-13). The theoretical framework used will be that of Government and Binding Theory (=GB), in the version outlined in Chomsky (1986), with modifications introduced by Abney (1987) and Pollock (1989). In order to clarify some of the descriptive assumptions made here, I shall beg in by providing a brief outline of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in adult English.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abney, S.P.: 1987, ‘The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akmajian, A. and F.W. Heny: 1975, An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, M.: 1989, The Acquisition of INFL, Indiana University Linguistics Club Publications, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anisfeld, M.: 1984, Language Development From Birth to Three, Erlbaum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M.: 1982, Explanations in the Study of Child Language Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellugi, U.: 1965, ‘The development of interrogative structures in children’s speech’, in K. Riegel (ed.), The Development of Language Functions, University of Michigan Language Development Program, report no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, H.E.: 1979, ‘Early lexical development: comprehension and production’. Journal of Child Language 6, 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L.: 1970. Language Development. MIT Press. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom. L.: 1973, One Word at a Time. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom. L.. P. Lightbown and L. Hood: 1978, ‘Pronominal-nominal variation in child language’. in L. Bloom (ed.), Readings in Language Development, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H. and K. Wexler: 1987, ‘The maturation of syntax’, in T. Roeper and E. Williams (eds.), Parameter Setting, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M.: 1973, Early Syntactic Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braine, M. D. S.: 1976, Children’s First Word Combinations, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, vol. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.: 1968, ‘The development of wh questions in child speech’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 7,279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.: 1973, A First lAnguage: The Early Stages, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and U. Bellugi: 1964, ‘Three processes in the child’s acquisition of syntax’, Harvard Educational Review 34, 133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and C. Fraser: 1963, ‘The acquisition of syntax’, in C. Cofer and B. Musgrave (eds.), Verbal Behaviour and Learning: Problems and Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B.: 1972, Child Language and Education, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1989, ’some notes on economy of derivation and representation’,MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 43–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G.: 1988, ‘Parameter setting in “instantaneous” and real-time acquisition’, The Behavioural and Brain Sciences 12, 336–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erreich, A., V. Valian and J. Winziemer: 1980, ‘Aspects of a theory of language acquisition’, Journal of Child Language 7,157–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin-Tripp, S. M.: 1964, ‘Imitation and structural change in children’s language’, in E. H. Lenneberg (ed.), New Directions in the Study of Language, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasold, R.: 1980, The Relation between Black and White Speech in the South, Mimeo. School of Languages and Linguistics, Georgetown University, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassi Fehri, A.: 1988, ‘Generalised IP structure, case, and VS word order’, in A. Fassi Fehri, A. Hajji, H, Elmoujahid and A. Jamari (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Linguistic Society of Morocco, Editions OKAD, Rabat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassi Fehri, A.: 1990, ‘Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words’, ms., University of Rabat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, N.: 1986, ‘A theory of category projection and its applications’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. and E. Wanner: 1982, ‘Language acquisition: The state of the state of the art’, in E. Wanner and L. Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodluck, H.: 1991, Language Acquisition: A Linguistic Introduction, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J.: 1967, ‘Topicalization in child language’, Foundations of Language 3, 37–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, E. and M. Noonan: 1989, ‘Functional categories and language acquisition’, ms., McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. A. C.: 1983, A Computatiollal Model of Language Acquisition in the Two Year Old, Indiana University Linguistics Club Publications, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T.: 1984, Transitivity: Grammatical Relations in Government-Binding Theory, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J.: 1975, ‘A child and the English question formation rule’, Journal of Child Language 2,299–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams, N.: 1986, Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazman, R.: 1988, ‘Null Arguments and the Acquisition of Case and INFL’, text of paper presented at University of Boston conference on language acquisition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Y.: 1986, ’subject in Japanese and English’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E.S. and U. Bellugi: 1966, ’syntactic regularities in the speech of children’, in J. Lyons and R. Wales (eds.) Psycholinguistic Papers, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche: 1985, ‘Theta theory and extraction’, GLOW Newsletter 14, 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczaj, S.: 1976, ‘Arguments against Hurford’s AUX Copying Rule’, Journal of Child Language 3, 423–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczaj, S.: 1977, ‘The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense inflections’, Journal of Verbal Learning anti Verbal Behaviour 16, 589–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S.-Y.: 1987 ‘(D)Accord ou Pas Accord: quelques idées générales concernant une grammaire comparée de l’anglais et dujaponais’, Recherches Linguistiques 14-15, 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W.: 1969, ‘Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula’, Language 45, 715–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, D.S.: 1987, ‘Comments on Hyams’, in T. Roeper and E. Williams (eds.), Parameter Setting, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, D.S.: 1988, ‘Language acquisition and the form of the grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, D.: 1974, The Acquisition of Modal Auxiliaries in the Language of Children. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune-Nicolich, L.: 1981, ‘The cognitive bases of relational words in the single word period’, Journal of Child Language 8,15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menyuk P.: 1969, Sentences Children Use, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. and S. Ervin-Tripp: 1973, ‘The development of grammar in child language’, in C. Ferguson and D. Siobin (eds.), Studies of Child Language Development, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport, E., H. Gleitman and L. Gleitman: 1977, ‘Mother, please I’d rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style’, in C. Snow and C. Ferguson (eds.), Talking to Children: Language Input anti Acquisition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, M.: 1981. ’syntactic constraints and the acquisition of embedded sentential complements’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack, C.: 1990, ‘A grammar without functional categories: A syntactic study of early Swedish duld language’, Nordic Journal of linguistics 13, 107–126, also published in Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 45, 51-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, L-Y.: 1989, ‘Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1986, ’small children’s small clauses’,Bangor Research Papers in linguistics 1. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1987, ‘The acquisition of the complementiser system’, Bangor Research Papers in linguistics 2, 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1988, ’small children’s small clauses’, Transactions of the Philological Society 86, 1–46 (revised and extended version of Radford, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1990a, Syntactic Theory anti the Acquisition of English Syntax: the Nature of Early Child Grammars of English, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1990b, ‘The syntax of nominal arguments in early child English’, Language Acquisition 1, 195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1991a, ‘Comments on Roeper and deVilliers’, to appear in J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck and T. Roeper (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.: 1991b, ’small children’s small minds’, paper presented at Linguistics Association of Great Britain meeting, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, C.: 1988, ‘On multiple questions and multiple wh fronting’, Natural Language and linguistic Theory 6, 445–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D.I.: 19792, Psycholinguistics, Scott Foresman and Co., Glenview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.: 1926, ‘An investigation of the development of the sentence and the extent of vocabulary in young children’, University of lowa Studies in Child Welfare, vol. 3, no. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraldsen, K.T.: 1986, ‘On verb second and the functional content of syntactic categories’, in H. Haider and M. Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, P.A. and J.G. de Villiers: 1973, ‘A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G.: 1979, ‘Learning and using the auxiliary verb in English’, in V. Lee (ed.), Language Development, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G.: 1985, Language Development in Preschool Years, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, W.: 1971, ‘Black-white speech differences revisited’, in W. Wolfram and N. H. Clark (eds.), Black-White Speech Relationships, Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Radford, A. (1992). The Acquisition of the Morphosyntax of Finite Verbs in English. In: Meisel, J.M. (eds) The Acquisition of Verb Placement. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5245-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2803-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics