Advertisement

The Genesis of Clausal Structure

  • Nina Hyams
Part of the Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics book series (SITP, volume 16)

Abstract

Not too long ago the consensus in the field was that during the early stages of language development young children did not have grammatical categories or relations of any sort. but rather that their grammars had a semantic basis (cf. Bowerman, 1973; Schlesinger, 1971, for example). A notable problem for such analyses was to account for the transition to an adult-like, syntactically-based system. Current theories which propose that functional categories are lacking or underspecified in early grammars, face a similar challenge. The latter hypothesis, which I will henceforth refer to as the small clause hypothesis, following Radford (1986, 1990), may in fact have a harder task in that the kinds of semantic bootstrapping mechanisms which have been posited for the acquisition of lexical categories, such as Noun and Verb (cf. Wexler and Culicover, 1980; Grimshaw, 1981), do not readily extend to functional categories, such as INFL or COMP, which have no clear referential function.

Keywords

Main Clause Subordinate Clause Functional Head Child Language Past Participle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antinucci, F. and R. Miller: 1976, ‘How children talk about what happened’, Journal of Child Language 3.Google Scholar
  2. Bates, E.: 1976, Language and Context, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bellugi, V.: 1967, ‘The acquisition of negation’, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  4. den Besten, H.: 1983, ‘On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules’, in W. Abraham (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Borer, H. and K. Wexler: 1988, ‘The maturation of grammatical principles’, ms.Google Scholar
  6. Bowerman, M.: 1973, Early Syntactic Development, Cambridge Vniversity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, R.: 1973, A First Language: The Early Stages, Harvard Vniversity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, R.: 1991, ‘Tense and agreement in different tenses’, ms., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.: 1989, ’some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 43–74.Google Scholar
  12. Chyi, C.: 1991, ‘A note on morphological overgeneralization’, ms., VCLA.Google Scholar
  13. Clahsen, H.: 1986, ‘Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode’, Linguistics 24,79–121.Google Scholar
  14. Clahsen, H.: 1990, ‘Constraints on parameter setting. A grammatical analysis on some acquisition stages in German child language’, Language Acquisition 1, 361–391.Google Scholar
  15. Emonds, J.: 1978, ‘The verbal complex V-V in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 9,151–175.Google Scholar
  16. Grimshaw, J.: 1981, ‘Form, function, and the language acquisition device’, in C. Baker and J. McCarthy (eds.), The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Guilfoyle, E. and M. Noonan: 1988, ‘Functional categories and language acquisition’, paper presented at the 13th Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
  18. de Haan, G.: 1986, ‘A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch’, paper presented at the Workshop Uni versals in Child Language, Heidelberg University, February 1986.Google Scholar
  19. Hyams, N.: 1983, ‘Acquisition of parameterized grammars’, Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY.Google Scholar
  20. Hyams, N.: 1986a, Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  21. Hyams, N.: 1986b, ‘Core and peripheral grammar and the acquisition of inflection’, paper presented at the 11th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
  22. Hyams, N. (in prep.) ‘C projections in child language’, ms., UCLA.Google Scholar
  23. Jaeggli, O. and N. Hyams: 1988, ‘Morphological uniformity and the setting of the null subject parameter’, Proceedings of NELS 18.Google Scholar
  24. Jaeggli, O. and N. Hyams: 1990, ‘On the interdependence of syntactic and morphological properties: Aspectual come and go’, to appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, K.: 1990, ‘On the syntax of inflectional paradigms’, ms., University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  26. Kayne, R.: 1989, ‘Null subjects and clitic climbing’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  27. Kitagawa, Y.: 1986, ’subjects in Japanese and English’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  28. Klein, S.: 1982, ’syntactic theory and the developing grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  29. Klima, E. S. and U. Bellugi: 1966, ’syntactic regularities in the speech of children’, in J. Lyons and R. J. Wales (eds.), Psycholinguistics Papers, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  30. Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche: 1988, ’subjects’, ms, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  31. Koster, J.: 1975, ‘Dutch as an SOV language’, Linguistic Analysis 1.Google Scholar
  32. Lebeaux, D.: 1988, ‘Language acquisition and the form of grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  33. Lebeaux, D.: 1989, ‘Parameter-setting, the acquisition sequence, and the form of the grammar: the composition of phrase structure’, paper presented at GLOW, Utrecht 1989.Google Scholar
  34. Limber, J.: 1973, ‘The genesis of complex sentences’, in T. Moore (ed.)., Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Lundin, B. and C. Platzack: 1988, ‘The acquisition of verb inflection, verb second and subordinate clauses in Swedish’, Working Papers on Scandinavian Syntax 42, 43–55.Google Scholar
  36. McKee, C. and M. Emiliani: 1990, ’some Italian two year olds. Morphosyntactic competence and why it matters’, ms., University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  37. MacWhinney, B.: 1974, ‘How Hungarian children learn to speak’, Ph.D. dissertation, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
  38. Meisel, J. M.: 1990. ‘INFL-ection: Subjects and subject-verb agreement’. J.M. Meisel (ed.). Two First Languages. Early Grammatical Development in Bilingual Children. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  39. Pierce, A.: 1989. ‘On the emergence of syntax: A crosslinguistic study’. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
  40. Pizzuto, E. and M. C. Caselli: 1991. ‘The acquisition of Italian morphology in a crosslinguistic perspective: Implications for models of language development’. paper presented at the Workshop on Crosslinguistic and Crosspopulations Contributions to the Theory of Acquisition, Hebrew University. Jerusalem, Israel, June 1991.Google Scholar
  41. Platzack, C.: 1990. ‘A grammar without functional categories: A syntactic study of early Swedish child language’, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 13. 107–126. also published in Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 45.Google Scholar
  42. Platzack, C. and A. Holmberg: 1989. ‘The role of AGR and finiteness in Germanic VO languages’, Scandinavian Working Papers in Linguistics 43.51–76.Google Scholar
  43. Pollock, J.-Y.: 1989. ‘Verb movement. Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.Google Scholar
  44. Radford, A.: 1986. ’small children’s small clauses’. Bangor Research papers in Linguistics 1. 1–38.Google Scholar
  45. Radford, A.: 1990, Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Blackwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  46. Raghavendra and L. Leonard: 1989, ‘The acquisition of agglutinating languages: Emerging evidence from Tamil’. Journal of Child Language 16, 313–323.Google Scholar
  47. Rizzi, L. and I. Roberts: 1990. ‘Complex inversion in French’, Probus 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
  48. Rögnvaldsson, E.: 1984. ‘Icelandic word order and ad-insertion’. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 8.Google Scholar
  49. Schaeffer, J.: 1990. ‘The syntax of the subject in child language’. M.A. thesis, State University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  50. Schlesinger, I.: 1971, ‘Production of utterances and language acquisition’, in D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Ontogenesis of Grammar, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Sigurjónsdóttir, S.: 1986. Spurnarsetningar i mali tveggja islenskra barna, M.A. thesis. Univerisity of Iceland.Google Scholar
  52. Sigurjónsdóttir, S.: 1987. ‘The development of subject-verb inversion phenomenon in the early grammars of Icelandic German and English speaking Children’, ms., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  53. Slobin, D.: 1982. ‘Universal and particular in the acquisition of language’, in E. Wanner and L. Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition: The Stale of the Art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  54. Thráinsson, H.: 1986, ‘VI, V2 and V3 in Icelandic’. in H. Haider and M. Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  55. Travis, L.: 1984. ‘Parameters and effects of word order variation’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  56. Valian, V.: 1990, ’syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children’. ms.Google Scholar
  57. Weinberg, A.: 1990. ‘Markedness versus maturation: The case of SAI’. Language Acquisition 1. 165–194.Google Scholar
  58. Weissenborn, J., M. Verrips, and R. Berman: 1989. ‘Negation as a window to the structure of early child language’. ms, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  59. Weist, R. and K. Witkowska-Stadnick: 1985. ‘Basic relations in child language and the word order myth’. ms., SUNY/Fredonia and Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar
  60. Weverink, M.: 1989, ‘The subject in relation to inflection in child language’, M.A. thesis, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  61. Wexler, K.: 1991, ‘Optional infinitives, head movement, and tbe economy of derivations in child grammar’, presented at tbe University of Maryland Conference on Verb Movement.Google Scholar
  62. Wexler, K. and P. Culicover: 1980, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Hyams

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations