Skip to main content

The Institutionalization and Professionalization of Scientific Research

  • Chapter
Between History and Method

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 145))

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

The modern ideal of science, and the mathematical and experimental method of investigation which contained the seeds of the subordination of technology to the demands of precision, did not lead immediately to a direct linkage between science and the economy. In any event, the industrial revolution of the eighteenth century took place practically without the participation of science. It was brought about by inventors, people of a practical bent who were not always and not necessarily acquainted with the theoretical basis of their inventions. These inventors worked usually by the method of trial and error. They proceeded empirically in the bad as well as the good sense of the word, and often despised theoreticians, regarding them as divorced from real life. Theoreticians paid them back in kind, claiming that they were not disinterested and acted not with the aim of advancing knowledge, but for personal and material gain, which is improper for men of science. This period can be virtually symbolized by the names of James Watt and Thomas Edison. The steam engine, which literally and metaphorically served as the engine of the industrial revolution, was constructed well before Fourier, Carnot, Clausius, Maxwell and Boltzmann established the foundations of thermodynamics. Their theories later served to introduce various improvements in the invention, but the innovation itself not only appeared but also found widespread use without their help. Lewis Mumford claims that “The detailed history of the steam engine, the railroad, the textile mill, the iron ship, could be written without more than a passing reference to the scientific work of the period.”1 This judgment certainly does not apply to the history of technological development during the last hundred years. Edisonés greatest invention, as Norbert Wiener notes ironically, was “the industrial research laboratory, turning out inventions as a business”;2 but priority in this field probably rests with the chemical industry of Germany and England.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter IV. The Institutionalization and Professionalization of Scientific Research

  1. Lewis Mumford, Technics and Civilization (London: Routledge and Sons Ltd., 1934), 215.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norbert Wiener, The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society (New York: Avon Books, 1967), 157.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Dumas, “Esquisse d’une histoire de la vie scientifique,” in Encyclopédie de la Pléiade: Histoire de la Science (Paris: Gallimard, 1957), 57.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The following numbers testify to the development of the German universities (from J. Ben-David, The Scientist2019s Role in Society, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971): The number of students increased from 16,000 in 1876 to 47,000 in 1908; in technical universities, which gained academic status only in 1899, there were 4000 in 1891 and 10,500 in 1899. Let us note that the development of technical universities created an additional demand both for the results of theoretical science and for scientists. They were also becoming the links connecting science with the economy. The size of the faculty increased at a slower rate: from 1313 in 1869 to 2275 in 1890 and over 3000 in 1910. The total university budget in Prussia, Saxony, Bavaria and Wìrttemburg grew from 12 million in 1880 to 40 million in 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Newcomb, “Exact Sciences in America,” in J.C. Burnham (ed.), Science in America: Historical Selections (New York: 1971), 204-205.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Barraclough, An Introduction to Contemporary History (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1964), 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rudolf Hilferding, Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development, ed. Tom Bottomore, trans. Morris Watnick and Sam Gordon, (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981 [orig. 1910]), 123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amsterdamski, S. (1992). The Institutionalization and Professionalization of Scientific Research. In: Between History and Method. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 145. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2706-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2706-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5199-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2706-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics