Skip to main content

Why Does Physics Need Mathematics?

  • Chapter
The Scientific Enterprise

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 146))

Abstract

The existence of a specific and peculiar relationship between physics and mathematics is an obvious and often-recognized fact. Many explicit testimonies occur throughout the history of physics, starting with the famous statement by Galileo:

Philosophy [Galileo is obviously referring to natural philosophy] is written in that great book permanently open to our eyes — I mean the Universe — but one cannot understand it if one does not first learn to know the language and the characters in which it is written. It is written in mathematical language, and its characters are triangles, circles, and other geometrical figures, without which it is humanly impossible to understand a single word of it. (Galileo 1623, 231.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aronson, S., 1964. Natural Philosopher 3:51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G., 1965. L’activite rationaliste de la physique contemporaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R., 1952. Oeuvres et Lettres. Paris: La Pleiade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., 1934. The World As I See It. Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P., 1967. The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman et al., 1963. The Feynman Lectures in Physics, Vol. 2. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo Galilei, 1623. II Saggiatore. Vol. 6.: Ed. Naz.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1—, 1914. Mathematical Discourses and Demonstrations Belonging to Two New Sciences. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, A., 1973. A Revolution in the Earth Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, H., 1971. Physics and Beyond. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeans, Sir James, 1973. The Mysterious Universe. London: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 1786. Metaphysische Anfangsgriinde der Naturwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langevin, P., 1950. La pensée et l’action. Paris: Ed. Français Réunis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. R., and T. M. Kalotas, 1975. Am. J. Phys. 43:434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo da Vinci, Scritti. Milan: Instituto Editoriale Italiano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uvy-Leblond, J.-M., 1976a. “What Is So Special about Relativity?” in Group Theoretical Methods in Physics. Ed. A. Janner et al. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2—, 1976b. Am. J. Phys. 44:271.

    Google Scholar 

  • 3—, 1977a. “Towards a Proper Quantum Theory,” in Quantum Mechanics, A Half-Century Later, ed. J. Leite Lopes and M. Paty. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • 4—, 1977b. “The Picture of the Quantum World: From Duality to Unity,” Int. J. Theor. Chem. 12 (Suppl. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • 5—, 1979. “La relativite aujourd’hui,” La Recherche 96/10.

    Google Scholar 

  • 6—, 1980. “Speeds,” Am. J. Phys. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • 7—, 1982. “In Praise of Wrong Theories,” Speculations in Science and Technology 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy-Leblond, J.-M., and J.-P. Provost, 1979. Am. J. Phys. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitte, B., 1984. “Construction et applications de la notion de groupe en cristallographie.” Lille: Université de Lille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H., 1913. La valeur de la science. Geneva: Le Cheval Ailé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J. R., 1972. “Galileo and the Mathematisation of Speed,” in La mathematisation des doctrines informes, ed. C. Canguilhem. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shive, J. N., and R. L. Weber, 1982. Similarities in Physics. Bristol: A. Hilger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, T., 1956. Physique mathématique classique. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, Y., 1983. Am. J. Phys. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • 8—, 1985. Am. J. Phys. 53:17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, A. S., 1976. “Mathematical Idealization and Theoretical Physics; the Role of Mathematical Physics,” Progress in Scientific Culture 1:16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E. P., 1967. Symmetries and Reflections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yourgrau, W., and S. Mandelstam, 1968. Variational Principles in Dynamics and Quantum Theory. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Edna Ullmann-Margalit

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lévy-Leblond, JM. (1992). Why Does Physics Need Mathematics?. In: Ullmann-Margalit, E. (eds) The Scientific Enterprise. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 146. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2688-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2688-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5190-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2688-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics