Modelling Memory for Models

  • Keith Stenning
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 52)


A “model” of a text is a mapping of its constants, predicates and relations onto a set of individuals. Stenning (1975, 1978) observed that powerful conventions for the interpretation of expository text ensure that texts determine models.

Two contrasting theoretical interpretations of these and other observations are current in the literature. Johnson-Laird and his associates (eg., Johnson-Laird & Steedman 1978, Johnson-Laird 1983) interpret models as a medium of mental representation. Alternatively, models may be treated as abstract objects which are important because they specify what is represented. For this latter interpretation, the question how representation is achieved is the outstanding psychological problem for theories of text comprehension and memory.

A central problem in the representation of models is the representation of individuals and their properties. This paper gives a brief description of the results of a research program aimed directly at the question of how models are represented during and after text comprehension. Analysis of memory performance (Stenning, Shepherd & Levy 1988) reveals that the underlying representation of individuals is distributed through a set of features representing existential facts about the whole ensemble of individuals described. Stenning & Levy (1988) show that a PDP simulation of the representations revealed in these analyses explains human error patterns.


Mental Model Human Reasoning Text Comprehension Natural Deduction Expository Text 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Craik, K. (1943) The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Erickson, J. R. (1974) A set analysis theory of behaviour in formal syllogistic reasoning tasks. In Solso, R. (ed.) Loyola Symposium on Cognition, Volume 2. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. L. (eds.) (1981) Mental Models. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Steedman, M. J. (1978) The psychology of syllogisms. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 64–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1986) Conditionals and mental models. Chapter 3 in Traugott, E. C., ter Meulen, A., Reilly, J.S. and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.) On Conditionals, pp 55–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Stenning, K. (1975) Understanding english articles and quantifiers. University Microfilms.Google Scholar
  7. Stenning, K. (1978) Anaphora as an approach to pragmatics. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. and Miller, G. A. (eds.) Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Stenning, K. and Levy, J. (1988) Knowledge-rich solutions to the ‘binding problem’: some human computational mechanisms. Knowledge Based Systems, 1.Google Scholar
  9. Stenning, K., Shepherd, M. and Levy, J. (1988) On the construction of representations for individuals from descriptions in text. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 129–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wason, P. C. and Johnson-Laird,P. N. (1988) Psychology of Reasoning: structure and content. London: Batsford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith Stenning
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Communication Research CenteEdinburgh UniversityEdinburghGermany

Personalised recommendations