Skip to main content

Correcting National Income for Environmental Losses: a practical solution for a theoretical dilemma

  • Chapter
National Income and Nature: Externalities, Growth and Steady State

Part of the book series: Economy & Environment ((ECEN,volume 5))

Abstract

In economic policy, in the media and, alas, also in some economic literature, the increase in production as measured in national income (or Gross National Product, GNP) is called economic growth, is identified with increase in welfare and is conceived as the indicator for economic success. Defining production growth as economic growth means defining economics as production. Such a definition excludes, among other things, the scarce environment from economics. Defined in this manner, economic growth obtains the highest priority in the economic policy of all countries1. At the same time we see all over the world growth of national income in accordance with the present pattern being accompanied by the destruction of the most fundamental scarce and, consequently, economic good at man’s disposal; the environment.

R. Hueting is head of the Department for Environmental Statistics, Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics. An earlier draft of this chapter was prepared as a paper for the Conference on Ecological Economics of Sustainability held in Washington, D.C., May 21–23, 1990.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Central Bureau of Statistics, Waterverontreiniging met afbreekbaar organisch en eutrofiërend materiaal (Water pollution by biodegradable organic and eutrophicating matter). The Hague, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics, Waterverontreiniging ten gevolge van verzilting, 1950–1970(Water pollution caused by salinization, 1950–1970). The Hague, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics, Luchtverontreiniging door verbranding van fossiele brandstoffen 1960–1972(Air pollution resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels 1960–1972). The Hague, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics, Functieverliezen in het milieu (Losses of function in the environment). Statistische en Econometrische Onderzoekingen No. 18, The Hague, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Council of Japan, Measuring net national welfare of Japan. Tokyo, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks J.R., The valuation of social income, Economica Vol. 15 (1948), pp. 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hueting R., Moet de natuur worden gekwantificeerd? (Should nature be quantified?). Economisch-Statistische Berichten, 21 January 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueting R., New scarcity and economic growth. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1980 (first edition 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueting R., Some comments on the report ‘A low energy strategy for the United Kingdom’, compiled by Gerald Leach et al. for the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Paper prepared for the Working Party on Integral Energy Scenarios, The Hague, 20 May 1981. Also published under the title: De relatie tussen produktiegroei en energieverbruik. Maakt groeifanatisme blind? (The relation between production growth and energy use. Does growth fanaticism blind?). Economisch-Statistische Berichten, 24 June 1981, pp. 609–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueting R., An economic scenario that gives top priority to saving the environment. Ecological Modelling Vol. 38, (1987) pp. 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hueting R., Correcting national income for environmental losses: towards a practical solution. In: Y. Ahmad, S. El Serafy, E. Lutz (eds), Environmental accounting for sustainable development. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueting R., The use of the discount rate in a cost-benefit analysis for different uses of a humid tropical forest area. Ecological Economics Vol. 3 (1991), pp. 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen H.M.A. and J.B. Opschoor, De Invloed van Geluidshinder op de Prijzen van Woningen-Verslag van een Enquête onder Makelaars in en rond de Haarlemmermeer (The Influence of Noise-nuisance on the Prices of Houses-Report of a Survey among House-Agents in and around the Haarlemmermeer). Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken van de Vrije Universiteit. Werknota No. 15. Amsterdam, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson P., The economic theory and measurement of environmental benefits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kapp K. W., Social costs, neo-classical economics, environmental planning: a reply. Social Science Information Vol. 11 (1972) Number 1 pp. 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneese A.V., Measuring the benefits of clean air and water. Resources for the Future, Inc., Washington D.C., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S., National income and industrial structure. In: The econometric society meeting, September 6–18, 1947, Washington, D.C., Proceedings of the International Statistical Conferences Volume V. Calcutta, 1947, p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S., On the valuation of social income. Economica Vol. 15 (1948) pp. 1–16 (February), pp. 116–131 (May).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipert C., Social costs of the economic process and national accounts: the example of defensive expenditures. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics Vol. 3 Number 1 (1989) pp. 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Hygiene, Concern for tomorrow. Alphen aan den Rijn, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, The next twenty five years. The Hague, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum E.P., Fundamentals of ecology, 3rd edition. Philadelphia, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D., A Markandya and E.B. Barbier, Blueprint for a green economy. Earthscan Publications Limited, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou A.C., Income. London, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag B.M.S. and J.S. Spit, The social filter process and income evaluation-an empirical study in the social reference mechanism. Report 82.08, Centre for Research in Public Economics, Leyden University, Leiden, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), Our common future. Oxford, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hueting, R. (1992). Correcting National Income for Environmental Losses: a practical solution for a theoretical dilemma. In: Krabbe, J.J., Heijman, W.J.M. (eds) National Income and Nature: Externalities, Growth and Steady State. Economy & Environment, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2590-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2590-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5143-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2590-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics