Abstract
In his Logical Investigations 1, Husserl proposed a harmonious division of labor between the mathematician and the philosopher in matters concerning logic. The mathematician was to continue doing what he was most competent at, namely, constructing deductive systems, without concern for the sense of such systems or for their critical status as contributions to a broader field of scientific knowledge. The philosopher’s task was to be different: to clarify what is involved in formal systems as contributions to the goal of genuine knowledge. Such a position makes certain basic assumptions. It assumes, for example, that mathematical construction can be effectively carried out without concern for its sense or applicability and yet yield results that, when applied to some domain, can contribute to knowledge. This position does not necessarily assume that subsequent reflection aimed at discerning the sense and epistemic contribution of such mathematical procedure can be accomplished without a background of technical competence in mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Edmund Husserl, Logical Investigation, two volume, translated by J.N. Findlay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.
Edmund Husserl, Formal and Transcendental Logic, translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1969. (Hereafter cited as FTL)
Suzanne Bachelard, A Study of HusserVs Formal and Transcendental Logic, translated by Lester E. Embree. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968, p. 54.
Suzanne Bachelard, A Study of HusserVs Formal and Transcendental Logic, translated by Lester E. Embree. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968, p. 55.
Edmund Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik, mit Ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901), edited by Lothar Eley. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1970, p. 440.
Edmund Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik, mit Ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901), edited by Lothar Eley. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1970, p. 441.
Edmund Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik, mit Ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901), edited by Lothar Eley. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1970, p. 443.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scanlon, J. (1991). “Tertium Non Datur:” Husserl’s Conception of a Definite Multiplicity. In: Seebohm, T.M., Føllesdal, D., Mohanty, J.N. (eds) Phenomenology and the Formal Sciences. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2580-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2580-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5138-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2580-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive