Skip to main content

Risk Analysis in Environmental Impact Studies

  • Chapter
Environmental Impact Assessment

Part of the book series: Eurocourses ((EUEI,volume 1))

Abstract

This paper deals with the subject of risk analysis in the framework of environmental impact studies of industrial installations. Starting from the fundamental definitions of risk, hazard, and accident, the main phases of the Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) procedure are described. The most important methods for implementing the different phases of a PRA are reviewed. When performed within an environmental impact study, the risk analysis must be extended to consider minor accidents; because of the large number of such accidents, advanced software tools are indispensable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AIChE (1989), Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dow Chemical (1986), Fire and Explosion Index. Hazard Classification Guide, 5th edition.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ICI, The Mond Rre and Toxicity Index.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Romano et at (1992), “Industrial Plant Risk Indices”, this book.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pickard, Lowe and Garrick (1981), Methodology for Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  6. AIChE (1985), “Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures”, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MI-STD-1629A (1977), Procedure for Performing a Failure Mode and Effect Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.T. Cowie (1976), “Hazard and Operability Studies. A New Safety Technique for Chemical Plants”, Prevention of Occupational Risks, Vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.G. Lawley (1974), “Operability Studies and Hazard Analysis”, Loss Prevention, Vol. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Amendola, A. Saiz de Bustamante (Editors) (1988), Reliability Engineering, Proceedings of the Ispra Course held at the Escuela Superior de Ingenieros Navales, Madrid, Spain, Kluwer Academic Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.G. Colombo, A. Saiz de Bustamante (Editors) (1990), System Reliability Assessment, Proceedings of the Ispra Course held at the Escuela Superior de Ingenieros Navales, Madrid, Spain, Kluwer Academic Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  12. TNO (1985), Methods for Determining and Processing Probabilities, (Red Book).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.E. Vesely et al. (1981), Fault Tree Handbook, NUREG-0492.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Nielsen (1975), “Use of Cause Consequence Charts in Practical Systems Analysis”, in Reliability and Fault Tree Analysis, SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  15. TNO (1979), Methods for the Calculation of the Physical Effects of the Escape of Dangerous Materials, (Yellow Book).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Shaw, F. Briscoe (1978), Evaporation from Spills of Hazardous Liquids on Land and Water, Report SRD R 100, UKAEA, Warrington, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Considine (1984), Thermal Radiation Hazard Ranges from Large Hydrocarbon Pool Fires, Report SRD R 297, UKAEA, Warrington, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.A. Croce, K.S. Mudan (1986), “Calculating Impacts for Large Open Hydrocarbon Rres”, Fire Safety Journal, pp. 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.K. Pritchard (1989), “A Review of Methods for Predicting Blast Damage from Vapour Cloud Explosions”, Journal of Loss Prevo in Process Ind., Vol 2, pp. 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. AIChE (1987), Guidelines for Use of Vapour Cloud Dispersion Models.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S.R. Hanna, D.G. Strirnaitis, J.C. Chang (1991), Hazard Response Modelling Uncertainty (A quantitative Method), Vol. II: Evaluation of Commonly-Used Hazardous Gas Dispersion Models, Sigma Research Corporation, Westford, MA 01886.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dutch Ministry of Housing and Environment (1989), Handbook for Consequence Modelling, (Green Book).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.F. Griffiths (1991), “The Use of Probit Expression in the Assessment of Acute Population Impact of Toxic Releases”, J. Loss Prevo Process Ind., Vol 4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.M. Pietersen (1990), “Consequences of Accidental Releases of Hazardous Material”, J. Loss Prevo Process Ind., Vol 3, pp. 136–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Contini, S., Servida, A. (1992). Risk Analysis in Environmental Impact Studies. In: Colombo, A.G. (eds) Environmental Impact Assessment. Eurocourses, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2528-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2528-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5116-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2528-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics