Advertisement

The Development of the Catholic Concept of Tradition from the Council of Trent to the Tübingen School

  • Gabriel Motzkin
Part of the Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture book series (PSCC, volume 1)

Abstract

I have suggested that the introduction of subjectivity changed the problem of continuity because continuity had to be provided at two levels, at the individual level and at the collective level, and also a way had to be found of linking together the continuity provided at these two levels. In traditional religions, primacy was accorded to the provision of continuity at the collective or institutional level. Note that this statement is not the same as saying that these religions were past-oriented. As we shall see, their effect on the individual level was reverse: they oriented the individual to the future. Perhaps the provision of a retrospective continuity on an individual level for a Cartesian subjectivity made it possible to develop a prospective continuity on a collective level, turning society towards the future once the problem of continuity with the past had been resolved on the individual level. I do not think, however, that the problem is that simple and that the solution was so neat. In the modern world, projectivity and retrospectivity were effectively interwoven at every level, and the relation between the two was never stable.

Keywords

Personal Life Religious Tradition Collective Identity Personal Time Christian Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    S. Wiedenhofer, “Tradition, Traditionalismus” in: Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. hrsg. von Otto Brunner, Wemer Conze und Reinhard Koselleck (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1972 et. seq.), Bd. 6 (1990), pp. 607–650.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franz Rosenzweig, The Star of Redemption. Trans. from the 2d. ed. of 1930 by William W. Hallo (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Joseph Ranft, Der Ursprung des katholischen Traditionsprinzips (Würzburg: Konrad Triltsch, 1931), pp. 113–115 et seq.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Ranft, Ibid., pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Jedin, op. cit., Eng. trans., v. 11, p. 62.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Jedin, Ibid., p. 53. Ranft, op. cit.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Jedin, Ibid., v. 11, p. 58 ff.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Ibid., also p. 75.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Ibid., also p. 74.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Ibid., pp. 59, 63, 74.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Ibid., p. 62.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Ibid.., pp. 82–83.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Ranft, op. cit., pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Ibid., p. 37.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Ibid,. p. 21.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    Ibid,. p. 28.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    Ibid,. p. 36.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    Bernard Reardon, Liberalism and Tradition. Aspects of Catholic Thought in Nineteenth-Century France (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), p. 73.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Jedin, op. cit., pp. 70–71.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    Ranft, op. cit.,. p. 38.Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Ibid., p. 47.Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    Smart Ninian., Nineteenth Century Religious Thought in the WestGoogle Scholar
  23. 24.
    Smart Ninian., Liberalism and Tradition. Aspects of Catholic Thought in Nineteenth-Century Francep. 51.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Smart Ninian., Nineteenth Century Religious Thought in the WestIbid., p. 58.Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    Rudolf Bultmann, “Zum Problem der Entmythologisierung” in: Rudolf Bultmann, Glauben und Verstehen: Gesammelte Aufsätze (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1975), v. 4, pp. 128-137; Eng. trans. by Barbara Hyams as: “The Problem of Demythologizing” in: ed. Kurt MueJler-Vollmer, The Hermeneutics Reader (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985, 1986), pp. 248–255. Hans-Georg Gadamer, op. cit., pp. 342-343.Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    Hennann Lübbe, Religion nach der Aufklärung (Graz: Styria Verlag, 1986), pp. 107–125.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel Motzkin
    • 1
  1. 1.The Hebrew University of JerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations