Advertisement

Eliminative Materialism and Connectionism

  • Yu-Houng Houng
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 141)

Abstract

Eliminative materialism, basically speaking, is the doctrine that the entities typed by folk psychological categories, such as belief and desire, are to be eliminated from our ontology. This doctrine should be distinguished from reductive materialism which does not deny the ontological status of the entities in question, but claims that the folk psychological concepts can be reduced to physiological or even physical concepts.

Keywords

Mental Representation Propositional Attitude Connectionist Model Folk Psychology Causal Story 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bogdan, R. J.: 1988, ’Mental attitudes and common sense psychology: The case against elimination, Nous 22, 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Churchland, Paul M.: 1981, ‘Eliminative materialism and propositional attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy 78, 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Churchland, Paul M.: 1989, A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science ,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Copp, D. and Macintosh, J. J. (eds.): 1985, Philosophy of Mind: Series II ,Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy, Guelph, Ontario.Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, D.: 1970, ‘Mental events’, Reprinted in Davidson (1980).Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, D.: 1980, Essays on Actions and Events ,Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Elman, J. L.: 1989, ‘Representation and structure in connectionist models’, Technical Report 8903, Center for Research in Language, Univ. of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  8. Hooker, C. A.: 1981, Toward a general theory of reduction, Dialogue 20, 38–59; 201–236; 496–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fodor, J. A.: 1978, ‘Propositional attitudes’, Monist 61, 501–521.Google Scholar
  10. Fodor, J.: 1975, The Language of Thought ,Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  11. Foss, J.: 1985, ‘A materialist’s misgivings about eliminative materialism,’ In Copp and Macintosh (eds.) (1985).Google Scholar
  12. Garfield, J. L.: 1988, Belief in Psychology: A Study in the Ontology of Mind ,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Hellman, G. P. and Thompson, F. W.: 1975, ‘Physicalism: ontology, determination, and reduction’, The Journal of Philosophy 72, 551–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houng, Y.-H.: 1991, Classicism, Connectionism, and the Concept of Level ,Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, J.: 1984, ‘Concepts of supervenience’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research XLV ,153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kitcher, P.: 1984, ‘In defense of intentional psychology’, Journal of Philosophy 81, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lycan, W. G. and Pappas, G. S.: 1972, ‘What is eliminative materialism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nickles, T.: 1973, Two concepts of intertheoretical reduction’, Journal of Philosophy LXX, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pollack, J. B.: 1988, ‘Recursive auto-associative memory: devising compositional distributed representations’, Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society ,Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
  20. Pollack, J. B.: 1990, ‘Recursive distributed representations’, Artificial Intelligence 46, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Putnam, H.: 1973, ‘Reductionism and the nature of psychology’, Cognition 2, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Putnam, H.: 1990a, Realism with a Human Face ,Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Putnam, H.: 1990b, ‘Is the causal structure of the physical itself something physical?’, In Putnam (1990a), Ch. 5.Google Scholar
  24. Robbin, J. W.: 1969, Mathematical Logic: A First Course ,Benjamin, N.Y.Google Scholar
  25. Salthe, S. N.: 1985, Evolving Hierarchical Systems ,Columbia Univ. Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  26. Simon, H.: 1981, The Sciences of Artificial (2nd edition), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Smolensky, P.: 1987, ‘On variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems’, Technical Report CU-CS-355-87, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Colorado.Google Scholar
  28. Smolensky, P.: 1988, ‘On the proper treatment of connectionism’, Behavioral and Brain Science 11, 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stich, S. P.: 1978, ‘Autonomous psychology and the belief-desire thesis’, Monist 61, 573–591.Google Scholar
  30. Stich, S. P.: 1983, From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science ,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  31. Stich, S. P.: 1988, ‘From connectionism to eliminativism’, Behavioral and Brain Science 11, 53–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Gelder, T.: 1989, Distributed Representations ,Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-Houng Houng

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations