Abstract
Labour economists have long been interested in modelling the collective bargaining process, but the development of such models has proceeded slowly. Two major stumbling blocks have impeded progress. The first is the problem of specifying the objectives of a labour union. The second problem is modelling how collective bargaining resolves conflicts between the objectives of the union and the employer. These problems are intimately related because the formulation chosen for union preferences plays a critical role in determining how bargaining can be modelled. In this paper we report progress on both froms. We construct a model of collective bargaining that is not only empirically tractable but also rigorously and explicitly grounded in maximizing behaviour by union members.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atherton, W. N. (1973) Theory of Union Bargaining Goals, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F. (1965) Mathematical Theory of Reliability, Wiley, New York.
deMenil, G. Bargaining: Monopoly Power versus Union Power, M.I.T. Press Cambridge, MA.
Dertouzos, J. N. and Pencavel, J. H. (1981) Wage and employment determination under trade unionism: the international typographical union. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 1162–81.
Dunlop, J. (1944) Wage Determination Under Trade Unions, Macmillan, New York.
Eaton, B. C. (1972) The potential for cast-push inflation in Canada and British Columbia. BC Studies, 13, 60–67.
Farber, H. S. (1978) Individual preferences and union wage determination: the case of the united mine workers. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 923–42.
Hamermesh, D. S. (1973) Who’ wins’ in wage bargaining? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 26, 1146–49.
Kramer, G. H. (1973) On a dass of equilibrium conditions for majority rule, Econometrica, 41,285–97.
McDonald, I. M. and R. M. Solow (1981) Wage bargaining and employment. American Economic Review, 71, 896–908.
Nash, J. F. (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–62.
Pencavel, J. H. (1984) The empirical performance of a model of trade union behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99, 215–31.
Plott, C. R. (1967) A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review, 57, 787–806.
Plott, C. R. (1973) Path independence, rationality, and social choice. Econometrica, 41, 1075–91.
Raiffa, H. (1953) Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games, in Contributions to the Theory of Games II, (eds. H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker) Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 361–87.
Ross, A. M. (1948) Trade Union Wage Policy, University of California Press, Berkeley CA.
Roth, A. E. (1979) Axiomatic Models of Bargaining Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Sen, A. K. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare Holden-Day, San Francisco.
Shapley, L. S. (1969) Utility Comparison and the Theory of Games, in La Decision (ed. G. Th. Guilbaud) Paris.
Shepsle, K. A. (1979) Institurional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 27–58.
Simons, H. C. (1944) Some Reflecrions on Syndicalism. Journal of Political Economy, 52, 1–25.
Slursky, S. (1977) A voting model for the allocation of public goods: existence of an equilibrium. Journal of Economic Theory, 14,299–325.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blair, D.H., Crawford, D.L. (1992). Labour union objectives and collective bargaining. In: Garonna, P., Mori, P., Tedeschi, P. (eds) Economic Models of Trade Unions. International Studies in Economic Modelling. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2378-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2378-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5049-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2378-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive