Skip to main content

EENY, MEENY, MINY, MOE: Testing Policy and Practice in Early Childhood

  • Chapter
Book cover Policy Perspectives on Educational Testing

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 32))

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

Early childhood education (ECE) is probably more vulnerable than any other educational sector to the winds of economic, political, and social change. This is largely due to the lack of a stable and universally agreed upon curriculum core, and because the inputs to the system, namely young children themselves, typically have not received formalized education, which would firmly anchor the ECE curriculum and provide “inertia” to the system. Nonetheless, certain practices are influencing the quality of early childhood education. The practice of testing young children is becoming more and more common, with significant social consequences, yet very little analysis has been carried out to ascertain the value, if any, of such a policy. It is therefore critical that we begin examining the consequences of standardized testing for young children. In this chapter, the practices and policies surrounding ECE and testing will be reviewed and conclusions drawn regarding their current effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abidin, R., W. Golladay and A. Howerton. (1971) Elementary school retention: An unjustifiable discriminatory and noxious educational policy, Journal of School Psychology, 9, 410–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. R. (1985) Review of the CIRCUS. In The ninth mental measurements yearbook, volume 1, ed. J. V. Mitchell, 326–28. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. and R. Ames. (1984) Goal structures and motivation, Elementary School Journal, 85, 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. and R. Ames, (eds.) (1985) Research on motivation in education. Vol. 2: The classroom milieu. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, L. B. (1980) Retention: A step forward, Early Years, 10, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, L. B. and F. L. Ilg. (1964) Gesell behavior tests as predictive of later grade placement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 719–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1983) What do intelligence tests measure? In On educational testing, ed. S. B. Anderson and J. S. Helmick, 5–28. San Francisco: lossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1986) Intelligence as a quality of behavior. In What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definitions, ed. R. J. Sternberg and D. K. Detterman, 19–21. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1988) Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, G., De Vries A., Thirion, A. and K. Stukat. (1975) Early childhood education in three countries, International Journal of Early Childhood, 7, 157–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranova, T. I. and N. S. Rozyeva. (1985) From the history of the experimental teaching of six-year-old children in the USSR, Soviet Education, 27 (5), 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, K. E. (1982) Preschool screening: The measurement and prediction of children at-risk. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, N. (1949) Consistency and variability in the growth of intelligence from birth to 18 years, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 75, 165–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, G. G. and P. D. Modlin. (1987) Gesell’s developmental testing: What purpose does it serve?, Psychology in the Schools, 24, 40–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, C. (1970) Entrance age to kindergarten and first grade: Its effect on cognitive and affective development of students. ERIC/ED 133 050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (1972) A study of the readiness room in a small school district in suburban Detroit, Michigan. Ph.D. diss., Dept of Psychology, Wayne State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, E. K. (1973) Research on organized programs of early education. In Second handbook of research on teaching, ed. R. Travers, 530–600. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocks, W. M. (1977) Nonpromotion: A year to grow?, Educational Leadership, 34 (5), 179–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, D. (1971) Boehm test of basic concepts. Cleveland: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, S. (1987) Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974) Is early intervention effective? A report on longitudinal evaluations of preschool programs. Washington, DC: Office of Child Development, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buros, O. K., (ed.) (1978) The eighth mental measurements yearbook. Highland Park: Gryphon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • California State Department of Education. (1988) Here they come, ready or not!: Report of the School Readiness Task Force. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. D. (1987) From national debate to national responsibility. In Early schooling: The national debate, ed. S. L. Kagan and E. F. Zigler, 65–82. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstens, A. (1985) Retention and social promotion for the exceptional child, School Psychology Review, 14, 48–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, G. P. and D. K. McIntosh. (1972) Three approaches to grouping procedures for the education of disadvantaged primary school children, Journal of Educational Research, 65, 425–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, R. (1985) Readiness: Should we make them ready or let them bloom? Day Care and Early Education, 12, 3, 25–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIRCUS. (1979) Monterey: CTB/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. and S. Scribner. (1974) Culture and thought: A psychological introduction. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. (1979) Lasting effects after preschool, summary report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children, Youth and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. (1983) As the twig is bent...Lasting effects of preschool programs. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, G. and J. Stammer. (1985) Grade retention and social promotion practices, Childhood Education, 4, 302–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. V. (1984) The self-worth theory of achievement: Findings and implications, Elementary School Journal, 8, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. V. and C. Omelich. (1979) Effort: The double-edged sword in school achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 169–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. (1970) Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. A. (1982) Interpreting functioning levels: Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery, Psychological Reports, 50, 1167–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E. (1990) Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahllof, U. S. (1971) Ability grouping, content validity, and curriculum process analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. and A. E. Wise. (1985) Beyond standardization: State standards and school improvement, The Elementary School Journal, 85, 315–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., Trimble, C. and D. Vincent. (1980) Does age of entrance affect school achievement? The Elementary School Journal, 3, 133–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985) New vitality in follow-ups of Head Start youngsters, The Brown University Human Development Newsletter, 1 (June), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, G. H. (1983) The birthdate effect-A maturational effect? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 161–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPasquale, G., Moule, A. and R. Flewelling. (1980) The birth date effect, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donofrio, A. F. (1977) Grade repetition: Therapy of choice, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 28–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donofrio, A. F. and M. O’Hare. (1969) Childhood misdiagnosis: The bias for psychogenicity, Psychology in the Schools, 6, 369–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C. O. (1978) Review of the Otis-Lennon. In The eighth mental measurements yearbook, 1107–11 (See Buros, 1978.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (1981) The hurried child: Growing up too fast too soon. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (1987) Miseducation: Preschoolers at risk. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (1988) The “miseducation” of young children, Education Week, 7 (19), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschel, Y. and A. Klein. (1978) The effects of integration and open education on mathematics achievement in the early grades in Israel, American Educational Research Journal, 15, 319–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (1982) Curriculum models and early childhood education. In Handbook of research in early childhood education, ed. B. Spodek. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherman, D. (1980) Schooling and occupational careers: Constancy and change in worldly success. In Constancy and change in human development, ed. O. Brim and J. Kagan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, G. and P. Schwartz. (1982) Developmental theories in early education. In Handbook of research in early childhood education, ed. B. Spodek. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenburg, W. K. and J. B. Dodds. (1981) Denver Developmental Screening Test-Revised. Denver: LADOCA Publishing Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B. J. (1985) Review of Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. In The ninth mental measurements yearbook, volume 2, ed. J. V. Mitchell, 1725–26. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983) Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1987) Developing the spectrum of human intelligence, Harvard Education Review, 57, 187–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R. (1969) Conservation acquisition: A problem of learning to attend to relevant attributes, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7, 167–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R. (1978) Cognitive development, Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 297–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R. and C. Gallistel. (1978) The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesereth, M. R. (1980) Metaphors and models. In Proceedings of the 1st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stanford, CA, 208-11. American Association for Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgia Department of Education. (1988) February, Promotion and Retention. Atlanta, Georgia. Georgia Department of Education. (1988) March. Memorandum to system superintendents. Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesell, A. (1954) The ontogenesis of infant behavior. In Manual of child psychology, L. Carmichael (ed.), 335–73. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesell Institute of Human Development. (1978) Gesell Readiness Screening Test. Lumberville: Programs for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesell, A. (1979) Gesell Preschool Test. Lumberville, PA: Programs for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesell, A. (1980) A gift of time...A developmental point of view. New Haven: Gesell Institute of Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesell, A. (1987) The Gesell Institute responds, Young Children, 43 (2), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. I. (1960) Classroom organizations. In Encyclopedia of educational research 3d ed., ed. C. Harris, 221–26. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. W., Ramsey, B. K. and R. A. Klaus. (1982) From 3 to 20: The early training project. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, G. R. (1975) Readiness for school: A look at some critical issues. In Reading and related skills, ed. M. Clark and A. Milne, 37–45. London: Wood Lock Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, G. R. (1978) A look at some important factors in assessing readiness for school, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, G. R. (1980) The birthdate effect: Fact or artifact? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 239–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, G. R. (1984) Transition classes: A viable alternative for the at-risk child? Psychology in the Schools, 21, 463–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. R. and S. V. Simmons. (1962) Chronological age and school entrance, Elementary School Journal, 63, 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, W. N. (1987) May. Young children face the states: Issues and options for early childhood programs. Washington, DC: Center for Policy Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadermann, K. F. (1976) Ability grouping-Its effect on learners, National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 60, 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, J., Ames, L. B. and C. Gillespie. (1980) The Gesell Preschool Test manual. Lumberville: Modern Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, V. (1963) Does entrance age affect achievement? The Elementary School Journal, (April), 391–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, D. P. and J. Kauffman. (1986) Exceptional children. 3d ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. H. (1967) The effectiveness of an approach to the problem of varying abilities in teaching reading. In School organization: Theory and practice, ed. M. P. Franklin, 443–48. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, R. M. (1988) Should baby read? New York Times Magazine, (22 May), 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, C. and K. Matthews. (1984) The effects of nonpromotion of elementary and junior high school pupils: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 54, 225–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilg, F. L. and L. B. Ames. (1965) School readiness. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilg, F. L., Ames, L. B., Haines, J. and C. Gillespie. (1978) School readiness: Behavior tests used at the Gesell Institute. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. B. (1975) The research evidence on the effects of grade retention, Review of Educational Research, 45, 613–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1981) Straight talk about mental tests. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, P. C. (1964) An investigation into the effect of date of birth on subsequent school performance, Educational Research, 6, 220–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. L. (1987) Early schooling: On what grounds? In Early schooling: The national debate, ed. S. L. Kagan and E. F. Zigler, 129–50. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and A. Tversky. (1982) Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. and J. W. Pellegrino. (1985) Human intelligence: Perspectives and prospects. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L. G. (1977) Early childhood programs and ideological disputes. In Talks with teachers, ed. L. G. Katz. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L. G. (1985) Dispositions in early childhood education, ERIC/ EECE Bulletin, 18, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L. G. (1987) Early education: What should young children be doing? In Early schooling: The national debate, S. L. Kagan and E. F. Zigler, 151–67. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, N. L. (1985a) Review of the McCarthy Screening Test. In The ninth mental measurements yearbook, volume I, ed. J. V. Mitchell, 928–30. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, N. L. (1985b) Review of Gesell preschool test. In The ninth mental measurements yearbook, volume 1, ed. J. V. Mitchell, 607–8. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirp, D. L. (1974) Student classification, public policy, and the courts, Harvard Educational Review, 44, 7–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1968) Early education: A cognitive-developmental view, Child Development, 39, 1013–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. and R. Mayer. (1972) Development as an aim of education, Harvard Educational Review, 42, 449–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, P., Kalk, J. M. and D. T. Searls. (1984) Age of admission and trends in achievement: A comparison of blacks and caucasians, American Educational Research Journal, 21, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laosa, L. M. (1984) Social policies toward children of diverse ethnic, racial, and language groups in the United State. In Child development research and social policy, ed. H. W. Stevenson and A. E. Siegel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, I., Darlington, R. B., Murray, H. W. and A. S. Snipper. (1982) Lasting effects of early education: A report from the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies, Monograph of Society for Research in Child Development, 47 (195, Serial No. 2-3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, L. J. (1972) Ability grouping: Defacto segregation in the classroom, Clearing House, 46, 293–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (1980) Transition rooms: Promoting maturation or reducing education? Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, R. (1980) The Minneapolis Preschool Screening Inventory. Minneapolis: Minneapolis Public Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, R. and H. Ireton. (1984) Preschool screening: Identifying young children with developmental and educational problems. Orlando: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, G. (1985) Review of the CIRCUS. In The ninth mental measurements yearbook, volume 1. J. V. Mitchell (ed.) 328–29. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D. (1972) McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D. (1978) McCarthy Screening Test. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, N. A. and R. E. Slavin. (1983) Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes, Review of Educational Research, 55, 519–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, C. (1980) First-grade entry age in a sample of children labeled learning disabled, Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. (1986) Relationships between the Gesell Readiness Test and standardized achievement and intelligence measures, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 1051–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. and E. Welch. (1984a) Developmental placement: Does it prevent future learning problems? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 338–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. and E. Welch. (1984b) The effects of developmental placement and early retention on children’s later scores on standardized tests, Psychology in the Schools, 21, 381–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. & E. Welch. (1985) The effects of developmental placement on young children’s cognitive and social-emotional development, Early Child Development and Care, 22, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. and E. Welch. (1986) Screening for school readiness: The influence of birthdate and sex, Psychology in the Schools, 23, 100–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrens, W. A. and I. J. Lehmann. (1984) Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. (3rd ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S. (1984) Prediction, prevention, and developmental screening in the EPSDT program. In Child development research and social policy, ed. H. W. Stevenson and A. E. Siegel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S. (1985) Developmental screening in early childhood: A guide. Washington, DC: NAEYC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S. (1986) Testing four-and five-year-olds: Response to Salzar and to Shepard and Smith, Education Leadership, 44, 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S. (1987) Uses and abuses of developmental screening and school readiness testing, Young Children, 42 (2), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S. (1988) Developmental screening in early childhood: The interaction of research and social policy, Annual Review of Public Health, 9, 527–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S. (1989) Can developmental screening tests identify children who are developmentally at-risk? Pediatrics, 83, 4, 578–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S. and N. J. Anastasiow. (1982) The risks of prediction: Relationships between etiology, handicapping conditions, and developmental outcomes. Vol. 3 of The young child: Reviews of research, ed. S. Moore and C. Cooper. Washington, DC: NAEYC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S. and M. S. Wiske. (1983) The Early Screening Inventory. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S. and L. Margolis. (1988) Is the early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment program effective with developmentally disabled children? Pediatrics, 81, 262–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S., Wiske, M. and T. Tivan. (1984) Predicting school performance with the Early Screening Inventory, Psychology in the Schools, 21, 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. and R. Norris. (1967) Entrance age and school success, Journal of School Psychology, 6, 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milofsky, C. D. (1974) Why special education isn’t special, Harvard Educational Review, 44, 437–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. V., (ed.) (1985) The ninth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. (1985a) Review of the McCarthy Screening Test. In The ninth mental measurements yearbook, volume I, ed. J. V. Mitchell, 930–32. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. (1985b) Review of Gesell Preschool Test. In The ninth mental measurements yearbook, volume I, ed. J. V. Mitchell, 608–09. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1979) Changes in mathematical achievement, 1973–78. Denver: NAEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1981) Reading, thinking and writing: results from the 1979–80 National Assessment of Reading and Literature. Denver: NAEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1986) NAEYC position statement on developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8, Young Children, 41 (6), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1988) NAEYC position statement on developmentally appropriate practice in the primary grades, serving 5-through 8-year-olds, Young Children, 43 (2), 64–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983) A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1979) The state of school science. Washington, DC: Commission on Human Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklason, L. B. (1984) Nonpromotion: A pseudoscientific solution, Psychology’ in the Schools, 21, 485–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurss, J. R. and M. E. McGauvran. (1976) Metropolitan Readiness Tests. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J. (1981) A question of access: tracking and curriculum differentiation in a national sample of English and mathematics classes. A study of schooling: Technical report, No. 24. Los Angeles: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J. (1985) Keeping track. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, T. (1985) Review of the Otis-Lennon. In The ninth mental measurements yearbook, volume 1, ed. J. V. Mitchell, 1111–12. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, W. C. (1967) Ability grouping: Pros and cons. In School organization: Theory and practice, ed. M. P. Franklin, 449–54. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, K. D. (1975) Early childhood education in historical perspective. Athens, GA: Education Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otis, A. and R. Lennon. (1979) Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985) Reading Ability. Boston: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, D. L., Lineberger, M. H. and W. G. Graziano. (1986) The academic and social consequences of grade retention: A convergent analysis. In Current topics in early childhood education: Volume 6, L. G. Katz (ed.), 224–52. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1957) How to solve it. 2d ed. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putka, G. (1988a) Schools start flunking many more students in drive on mediocrity, Wall Street Journal, November 30, 1, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putka, G. (1988b) Tense tots: Some schools press fast-track children so hard that they become stressed and fearful. Wall Street Journal, July 6, 1, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raygor, B. (1972) A five year followup study comparing the school achievement and school adjustment of children retained in kindergarten and children placed in a transition class. Ph.D. diss., Dept of Psychology, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. M. (1986) Whatever happened to kindergarten? Educational Leadership, 44, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1982) Integrating context and cognitive development. In Advances in developmental psychology: Vol. 2, ed. M. E. Lamb and A. L. Brown, 125–70. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J., Medway, F., Cantrell, V. and S. Marcus. (1983) A fresh look at the retention-promotion controversy, Journal of School Psychology, 21, 201–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvia, J. and J. E. Ysseldyke. (1985) Assessment in special and remedial education. 3d ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1987) Policy, implentation, and the problem of change. In Early schooling: The national debate, S. L. Kagan and E. F. Zigler (eds.), 116–28. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (1982) Assessment of children’s intelligence and special abilities. 2d ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985) Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. In Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives, E. A. Silver (ed.), 361–79. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweinhart, L. S. and J. Koschel. (1986) Policy options for preschool programs. Ypsilanti: High/Scope Early Childhood Policy Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligmann, J. and A. Murf. (1988) Making the (first) grade: Georgia puts kindergarten skills to the test, Newsweek, (April 25), 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmel, M. I., Gottlieb, J. and N. M. Robinson. (1979) Mainstreaming: Perspective on educating handicapped children in the public school. In Review of research in education: Vol. 7, D. C. Berliner (ed.), 223–79. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. and M. L. Smith. (1985) March. Boulder Valley kindergarten study: Retention practices and retention effects. Boulder: Boulder Valley Public Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. and M. L. Smith. (1986) Synthesis of research on school readiness and kindergarten retention, Educational Leadership, 44, 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. and M. L. Smith. (1988) Escalating academic demand in kindergarten: Counterproductive policies, Elementary School Journal, 89, 135–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. and M. L. Smith. (1980) Effects of kindergarten retention at the end of first grade, Psychology in the School, 24, 4, 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigel, I. E. (1987) Early childhood education: Developmental enhancement or developmental acceleration? In Early schooling: The national debate, ed. S. L. Kagan and E. F. Zigler, 129–50. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, D. T. (1983) Early intervention and its effects on maternal and child development, Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48 (4, Serial No. 202)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, D. H. and M. J. Smith. (1981) Modeling structural problem solving, Artificial Intelligence, 16 (2), 171–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. F. (1986) The validity of the Boehm Test of Basic Concepts, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 332–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. and L. A. Shepard. (1987) What doesn’t work: Explaining policies of retention in the early grades, Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 129–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spodek, B. (1972) Teaching in the early years. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spodek, B. (1983) Early childhood education and evaluation: An overview, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 8, 203–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spodek, B. (1986) Development, values and knowledge in the kindergarten curriculum. In Today’s kindergarten: Exploring its knowledge base, extending its curriculum, ed. B. Spodek, 32–47. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spodek, B. (1988) Conceptualizing today’s kindergarten curriculum, Elementary School Journal, 89, 203–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starch, D. and E. C. Elliott. (1912) Reliability of grading high school work in English, School Review, 20, 442–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1977) Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1985) Beyond lQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. and D. K. Detterman. (1986) What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definitions. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmadge, S. J. (1981) Descriptive and predictive relationships among family environments, cognitive characteristics, behavioral ratings, transition room placement, and early reading achievement. Ph.D. diss., University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1986) August. Half of mothers with children under 3 now in labor force. Washington, DC: USDL 86–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K. (1983) Human processing skill acquisition: Theory, model, and psychological validation. Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 420–23. Washington, DC: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1967) Manual for the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, L. (1968–1969) School entrance age and adjustment, Journal of School Psychology, 7, 209–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westinghouse Learning Corporation. (1969) The impact of Head Start: An evaluation of the effects of Head Start on children’s cognitive and affective development: Vols. I–II. Athens: Ohio University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. (1970) Group versus individual intelligence tests in one sample of emotionally disturbed children. Psychological Reports, 27, 819–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winn, M. (1983) Children without childhood. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C., Powell, S. and R. C. Knight. (1984) Predicting school readiness: The validity of developmental age, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. and B. Johnson. (1977) Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Hingham: Teaching Resources Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. A. (1985) Pricing the priceless child: The changing value of the child. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E. (1970) The environmental mystique: Training the intellect versus development of the child, Childhood Education, 46, 402–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E. (1973a) Project Head Start: Success or failure? Children Today, 2, 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E. (1973b) Myths and facts: A guide for policymakers, Compact, 7, 18–2l.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E. (1987) Formal Schooling for Four-Year-Olds? No, American Psychologist, 42, 254–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E. and P. Trickett. (1978) IQ, social competence, and evaluation of early childhood intervention programs, American Psychologist, 33, 789–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E. and J. Valentine. (1979) Project Head Start: A legacy of the war on poverty. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cunningham, A.E. (1993). EENY, MEENY, MINY, MOE: Testing Policy and Practice in Early Childhood. In: Gifford, B.R. (eds) Policy Perspectives on Educational Testing. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2226-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2226-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4987-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2226-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics