Skip to main content

Pivotal Voters and Political Equilibria

  • Chapter
Preferences and Democracy

Part of the book series: International Studies in Economics and Econometrics ((ISEE,volume 28))

  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

One central element in the literature on electoral competition is the degree of platform convergence - the extremes being full convergence and systematic divergence. To explain divergence, we can begin by distinguishing between necessary and sufficient conditions. The former pertains to the attitudes (preferences) of voters and the latter to the political game, i.e. to the way institutions and behaviors are modeled. Once we recognize that the precommitment of candidates can be traced back to the attitudes of voters, it is clear that the presence of polarized voter preferences is a prerequisite for platform differentiation. ‘The aim of this paper is to test for the presence of this necessary condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alesina, Alberto. “Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System with Rational Voters.” A.E.R. 78 (Sept. 1988): 796–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, Alberto. “Politics and Business Cycles in Industrial Democracies.” Economic Policy 8 (1989): 57–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, Gianluigi, and Breton, Albert. “An Economic Theory of Political Parties.” Kyklos 39 (1, 1986): 47–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, Gianluigi, and Forcina, Antonio. “Political Loyalties and the Economy: the US Case.” Rev. Econ. and Stat. 71 (August 1989): 511–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, Gianluigi. “The Number of Parties and Political Competition.” In The Competitive State, edited by Albert Breton, Gianluigi Galeotti, Pierre Salmon, and Ronald Wintrobe. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991: 113–127

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Dennis C. Public Choice II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, Samuel. “How Efficient is the Voting Market.” The J. Law and Econ. 33 (April 1990): 27–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, Donald A. “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories.” Am. Pol. Science Rev. 77 (Jan. 1983): 142–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Galeotti, G. (1993). Pivotal Voters and Political Equilibria. In: Breton, A., Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., Wintrobe, R. (eds) Preferences and Democracy. International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2188-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2188-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4969-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2188-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics