Skip to main content

Equilibrium Political Inaction in a Democracy

  • Chapter
Preferences and Democracy

Part of the book series: International Studies in Economics and Econometrics ((ISEE,volume 28))

Abstract

The suppression of political demands is usually associated with dictatorships. In democracies, individuals are typically free to speak out on political issues, to organize or participate in demonstrations against the government, write letters to newspapers, and so forth, and their right to do so is protected by a judicial system which is independent of the government. Nevertheless, political freedom is not complete in any democracy, and certain overt restrictions are typically imposed. These overt restrictions are usually imposed on freedom of speech where significant external costs might result. In this category are the restrictions imposed by many jurisdictions against “hate” literature; libel laws; restrictions on the discrimination of pornographic literature, to engage in criminal conspiracies, and so forth. More severe restrictions are often imposed on speech which has commercial rather than a political purpose.’ In Canada, for example there is no law banning the activity of prostitution, but therearelaws against the soliciting of customers by prostitutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aldrich, John H. “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism.”American Political Science Review77 (1983): 974–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, Alberto. “Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System with Rational Voters”American Economic Review78 (1988): 796–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, Albert, and Wintrobe, Ronald. “Freedom of Speech vs Efficient Regulation in Markets for Ideas.”Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization17 (1992): 217–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Criminal Cases 38 C.C.C. (3d). Reference re Criminal Code SS 193 and 195. 1(1)(c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald. “The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas.” American Economic Review64 (1977: 384–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, James M., and Melvin J. Hinich. “Ideology, Issues, and the Spatial Theory of Elections.”American Political Science Review76 (1982): 493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. Bingham, Jr. “Extremist Parties and Political Turmoil: Two Puzzles.” American Journal of Political Science30 (1986: 357–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, GiovanniParties and Party Systems.New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, Ronald. “Political Competition and the Rise of Dictatorship” in A Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salmon and R. Wintrobe, eds.The Competitive State.Kluwer Academic Press, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, Donald. “Parties as Utility Maximizers.”American Political Science Review67 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories.”American Political Science Review.77 (1983): 142–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Howitt, P., Wintrobe, R. (1993). Equilibrium Political Inaction in a Democracy. In: Breton, A., Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., Wintrobe, R. (eds) Preferences and Democracy. International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2188-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2188-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4969-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2188-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics