Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Studies in Economics and Econometrics ((ISEE,volume 28))

Abstract

Until about a dozen years ago, the economic analysis of the relationship between political preferences and political demands was a rather straightforward, if dull, subject. The most common assumption was that the only political instrument available to citizens was the vote. Given this assumption, the analyst could express the outcome of the voting process in one of two ways. One possibility was to make the heroic assumptions necessary to obtain the median voter theorem, in which case, the political demands of the citizenry are simply the preferences of the median voter. The alternative was to make Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem in which case even though individual preferences are well ordered, no collective preference function exists. On either of these approaches, institutions such as interest groups, political parties, or the structures of political representation played no role in the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alesina, Alberto. “Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System with Rational Voters.”American Economic Review78 (1988): 796–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, Alberto. “Political Cycles.” (1990) Paper delivered at the European Public Choice Society meetings, Beaune, France, April 3, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, O.A., Hinich, MJ., and Ordeshook, P.E. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process”American Political Science Review64 (1970): 426–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Douglas A. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.”American Political Science Review76 (1977): 493–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, Melvin, Ledyard, John and Ordeshook, Peter “Nonvoting and the Existence of Equilibrium under Majority Rule.”Journal of Economic Theory4 (1972): 144–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. H.Public Choice II.New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. North, Douglas, and Weingast, Barry. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of the Institutions Governing Public Choice in 17th Century England.”Journal of Economic History(December 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, Torsten, and Svensson, Lars E. “Why a Stubborn Conservative Would Run a Deficit: Policy with Time-Inconsistent Preferences.”Quarterly Journal of Economics104 (1989): 325–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, Kenneth. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multi-dimensional Voting Models.”American Journal of Political Science23 (1979): 27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, Guido. “The Politics of Intergenerational Redistribution.”Journal of Political Economy99 (1991): 335–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry, and Marshall, William. “The Industrial Organization of Congress”Journal of Political Economy96 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, Donald. “Parties As Utility Maximizes”American Political Science Review67 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breton, A., Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., Wintrobe, R. (1993). Introduction. In: Breton, A., Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., Wintrobe, R. (eds) Preferences and Democracy. International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2188-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2188-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4969-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2188-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics