Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 30))

Abstract

Ludwig von Mises’ (1920, 130) claim that “rational economic planning is impossible in a socialist commonwealth” initiated the once-famous planning debate, which was widely thought to have been resolved by Lange (1938) in favour of the planners. Further development of general equilibrium theory apparently strengthened the proposition that, in Frank Hahn’s (1984, 347) words, “anything the ideal economy can do the state can also do, but not vice versa since there may be externalities and public goods”. Dasgupta (1986, 30-31), having shown how formidable the task is of acquiring the knowledge needed to devise an endowment set that would generate a desired Pareto optimum as a competitive equilibrium, correctly observes that there is no obvious reason why planners who possess such knowledge should not impose that optimum directly. He continues: “The Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics — which is so often seen by economists as providing a reason why the state ought to rely on markets — holds true only in circumstances where there is no need to rely on markets at all. I have no explanation for this paradox” — which he thereafter ignores, failing to see that the neo-Walrasian models of planning and markets share a basic flaw.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References

  • Barro, R. J. 1979. “Second thoughts on Keynesian Economics,” American Economic Review 69(2): 54–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, L. A. 1986. Methodology for a New Microeconomics: The Critical Foundations. Boston: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1982. The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1990. Enterprise and Competitiveness: A Systems View of International Business. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, NS 4: 386–405. Reprinted in Coase (1988b), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. 1988a. “The Nature of the Firm: Origin,” Journal of Law,Economics, and Organization 4: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. 1988b. The Firm, the Market,and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. 1986. “Positive Freedom, Markets and the Welfare State,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2(2): 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. 1988. The Organization of Economic Activity, Volume I: Ownership,Control and the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, H. 1990. “Equilibrium and Explanation.” In Foundations of Economic Thought, Creedy, J. (ed.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 356–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehl, U. 1986. “Spontaneous Order and the Subjectivity of Expectations: A Contribution to the Lachmann-O’Driscoll Problem.” In Subjectivism,Intelligibility and Economic Understanding, Kirzner, I. M. (ed.) Basingstoke and London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F. M. 1983. Disequilibrium Foundations of Equilibrium Economics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R. W. 1964. Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, R. W. 1982. “Austrian Economics as the Middle Ground: Comment on Loasby.” In Method, Process,and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises, Kirzner, I. M. (ed.) Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 131–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. J. 1990. “What is new-Keynesian Economics?” Journal of Economic Literature XXVIII: 1115–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. H. 1973. On the Notion of Equilibrium in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Hahn (1984), 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. H. 1984. Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Hayek, F. A. 1931. Prices and Production. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge,” Economica, NS 4: 33–54.Reprinted in Hayek (1948), 33–56. Page references are to this reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1940. “Socialist Calculation: The Competitive ‘Solution”’, Econ-omica, NS 8: 125–49. Reprinted in Hayek (1948), 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” American Economic Review XXXV: 519–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J. D. 1981. Economics in Disequilibrium. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. 1985. Discovery and the Capitalist Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L. M. 1986. The Market as an Economic Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, O. and Taylor, F. M. 1938. On the Economic Theory of Socialism. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. 1990. “Firms, Markets and the Principle of Continuity.” In Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall, Whitaker, J. K. (ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. 1871 [1950]. Principles of Economics. Translated and edited by James Dingwall and Bert F. Hoselitz. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. 1883 [1963]. Problems of Economics and Sociology. Edited by L. Schneider and translated by F. J. Knock. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. von. 1920. “Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth.” (translated). In Collectivist Economic Planning (1935), Hayek, F. A. (ed.) London: Routledge, 87–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. B. 1960. Information and Investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. B. 1972. “The Organization of Industry,” Economic Journal 82: 883–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, M. 1989. “Hayek’s Four Tendencies Toward Equilibrium,” C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics Research Report, 89–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. Volumes 1 and 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, J. K. 1975. The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall 18671890. Volumes 1 and 2. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1986. Economic Organization: Firms, Markets and Policy Controls. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Boehm, S. 1986. “Time and Equilibrium: Hayek’s Notion of Intertemporal Equilibrium Reconsidered.” In Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding: Essays in Honor of Ludwig M. Lachmann on His Eightieth Birthday,Kirzner, I. M. (ed.). New York: New York University Press, 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clower, R. W. 1965. “The Keynesian Counterrevolution: A Theoretical Appraisal.” In The Theory of Interest Rates, Hahn, F. H. and Brechling, F. P. R. (eds.). London: Macmillan, 103–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eatwell, I. 1982. “Competition.” In Essays in Honour of Ronald L. Meek,Bradley, J. and Howard, M. (eds.). London: Macmillan, 203–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garegnani, P. 1976. “On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Workon Value and Distribution.” In Essays in modern capital theory, Brown, M.,Sato, K. and Zarembka, P. (eds.). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge,” Economica, NS, vol. 4. Reprinted in

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1976) Individualism and Economic Order. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Reprinted as Vol. VII of The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. 1937. “The General Theory of Employment,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 1937. Reprinted in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIV. London: Macmillan (1973), 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. 1988. “Welfare Economics: A Modern Austrian Perspective.” In Man, Economy and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray Rothbard. Block, W. & Rockwell, L. H. (eds.). Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L. M. 1976. “From Mises to Shackle: An Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidic Society,” Journal of Economic Literature, 14: 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L. M. 1979. “On the Recent Controversy Concerning Equilibration,”Austrian Economics Newsletter 2(2): 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leijonhufvud, A. 1968. On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. 1976. Choice, Complexity and Ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. 1989. The Mind and Method of the Economist. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, G. P. Jr & Rizzo, M. J. 1985. The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncaglia, A. 1978. Sraffa and the Theory of Prices. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loasby, B.J., Torr, C. (1992). Market Co-Ordination. In: Caldwell, B.J., Boehm, S. (eds) Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2186-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2186-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4968-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2186-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics