Skip to main content

Subjectivism, Explanation and the Austrian Tradition

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 30))

Abstract

My aim in this chapter is to stimulate and provoke. I have tried to raise some problems in the expectation that this may lead my discussant into offering some telling responses. In writing, I have presupposed a broad knowledge of the work of the subjectivist writers in the Austrian tradition. Not only are many good secondary accounts available, but there is no substitute for reading the works of the key figures themselves. I have also, and by conscious decision, written in an impressionistic manner, and I have not attempted to provide a full account of, or to engage with all of the — often important — secondary literature. To have done this would have been an interesting task, but it is not mine on the present occasion. Rather, my aim has been to tweak the tail of a venerable and mighty lion — in the hope that we may be both impressed and inspired by the resulting roar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adorno, T. et al. 1976. The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology.London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Norman et al. 1984. Hayek’s “Serfdom” Revisited.London: Institute-of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, W. W. III 1990. Unfathomed Knowledge, Unmeasured Wealth.La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. and de Marchi, N. (eds.) 1991. Appraising Economic Theories. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James and Vanberg, Viktor. 1986. “Rational Choice and Moral Order,”Analyse und Kritik10: 138--60

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James. 1991. “Jack Wiseman: A Personal Appreciation,” Constitutional Political Economy2(1): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, E. 1988. Ludwig von Mises: Fountainhead of the Modern Microeconomic Revolution.Brookfield, VT: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (ed.) 1990. Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Lorenzo, T. 1990. “The Subjectivist Roots of James Buchanan’s Economics,” Review of Austrian Economics4: 180–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, P. (ed.) 1988. Psychological Economics.Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, P. and Kay, N. M. 1985. “How Economists Can Accept Shackle’s Critique of Economic Doctrines Without Arguing Themselves Out of Their Jobs,” Journal of Economic Studies12: 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, R. 1986. “Toward a Hermeneutical Economics.” In Kirzner (1986a), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. 1988. The Moral Dimension.New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1979. The Counter-Revolution of Science.Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (ed.) 1986a. Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding.New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. 1986b. “Another Look at the Subjectivism of Costs.” In Kirzner (1986a), 140–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, R. 1990. “Towards an Empirics of Subjectivist Economics.” Fairleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson University: Center for Economics and Finance, Working Paper 90–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, R. 1991. “Economic Effects of the Choice of Constraints” (unpublished). Lachmann, Ludwig. 1951. “The Science of Human Action,” Economica18 (November 1951): 412–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, Ludwig. 1977. Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process, Walter Grinder, (ed.) Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. and Koppl, R. 1984. “Fritz Machlup and Marginalism: A Re-evaluation,” George Mason University: Center for the Study of Market Processes, Working Paper 1984–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. (ed.) 1986. Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. 1986. “Euclideanism versus Hermeneutics: A Reinterpretation of Misesian Apriorism.” In Kirzner (1986a), 192–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, Fritz. 1978. The Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences.New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David (ed.) 1985. Popper Selections.Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von 1949. Human Action.London: Hodge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von 1981. Epistemological Problems of Economics.New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Laurence. 1990. [Review of Butler (1988)1, Journal of the History of Economic Thought12: 236–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia.Oxford: Blackwell. O’Driscoll, G. and Rizzo, M. 1985. The Economics of Time and Ignorance.Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies.Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1972. Objective Knowledge.New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1976. “The Logic of the Social Sciences.” In Adorno et al. (1976), 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1977. The Poverty of Historicism.New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1985. “The Rationality Principle.” In D. Miller (ed.) (1985), 257–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Runde, J. H. 1988. “Subjectivism, Psychology and the Modern Austrians.” In Earl (ed.) (1988), 101–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekler, David. 1975. Thorstein Veblen and the Institutionalists.London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, J. 1983. “Subjectivism, Falsification and PositiveEconomics.” In Wiseman (ed.) (1983), pp. 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, J. 1984. “Hayek and the Spirit of the Age.” In Barry et al (1984), 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, J. 1990. “From Hayek to Menger.” In Caldwell (ed.) (1990), 198–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, J. 1991a. “Common Sense and the Foundations of Economic Theory: Duhem versus Robbins.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 21: 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, J. 1991b. “Popper, Lakatos and Theoretical Progress in Economics.” In Blaug and de Marchi (eds.) (1991), 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, J. 1991c. “McCloskey, Dialogue and Spontaneous Order.” Paper de livered to History of Economics Society Annual Meeting, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1978. Lectures on Jurisprudence.Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1975. Roscher and Knies: The Logical Problems of Historical Econ- omics.New York: The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, Jack (ed.) 1983. Beyond Positive Economics?London: Macmillan. Wiseman, Jack. 1989. Cost, Choice and Political Economy.Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, Leland. 1987. “Why Subjectivism?,” Review of Austrian Economics 1:5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, P. E. 1986. Lifestyle Economics: Consumer Behaviour in a Turbulent World.New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. 1990. A Tenured Professor.New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, R. F. 1989. Marketing Mistakes(4th ed). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M. 1980. Judgement and Choice: The Psychology of Decision.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latsis, S. J. 1972. “Situational Determinism in Economics,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science25: 207–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. C. 1978. The Fallacy of the Mixed Economy.London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. 1976. Choice, Complexity and Ignorance.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. P. 1986. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal Knowledge.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D. A. and Newell, A. 1971. “Protocol Analysis as a Task for Artificial Intelligence,” Artificial Intelligence2: 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shearmur, J., Earl, P.E. (1992). Subjectivism, Explanation and the Austrian Tradition. In: Caldwell, B.J., Boehm, S. (eds) Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2186-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2186-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4968-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2186-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics