Skip to main content

Levels of Lexical Representation

  • Chapter
Semantics and the Lexicon

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 49))

Abstract

The lexicon has typically been viewed as a mere list of lexical entries containing idiosyncratic information associated with individual words. Therefore, linguists have paid little attention to the internal structure of lexical entries. More recently, linguists have recognized a need to develop a more structured and elaborated lexical representation. Central to all current theories of the lexicon is a representation of the argument-taking properties of predicators, often referred to as a predicate-argument structure.1 Motivation for the development of theories of predicate-argument representation has come from two sources.

This paper was written in 1987 and also appears as Rappaport, M., Levin, B., and Laughren, M. (1988) Niveaux de représentation lexicale, Lexique 7, 13–32. Although the major positions outlined in this paper are still held by the authors, it should be clear that the paper does not represent the most current eonception of lexical representation of any of the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, S.R. (1977) Comments on the Paper by Wasow. In P. Culicover, A. Akmajian and T. Wasow (eds.), (1977), pp. 361-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. (1982) The Passive in Lexical Theory. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 3–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, L. (1986) Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R.J. (1976) Some Constraints on Possible Words, Semantikos 1, 27–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.A. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, P., Akmajian, A. and Wasow, T.(eds.) (1977) Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, P. and Wilkins, W. (1984) Locality in Linguistic Theory, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, N. (1984) Syntactic Affixation, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C.J. (1968) The Case for Case. In E. Bach and R.T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J.S. (1965) Studies in Lexical Relations, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Alsopublished in Gruber, J.S. (1976) Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerssel, M. (1986) On Berber Verbs of Change: A Study of Transitivity Alternations, Lexicon Project Working Papers 9, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K.L. and Keyser, S.J. (1986) Some Transitivity Alternations in English, Lexicon Project Working Papers 7, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K.L. and Keyser, S.J. (1987) A View from the Middle, Lexicon Project Working Papers 10, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K.L. and Laughren, M. (1983) The Structure of Verbal Entries: Preface to Dictionary Entries of Verbs, Warlpiri Lexicon Project, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J.T. (1985), On Semantics, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R.S. (1976) Toward an Explanatory Semantic Representation, Linguistic Inquiry 7, 89–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R.S. (1983) Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyser, S.J. and Roeper, T. (1984) On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 381–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H. (1984) The Syntax of Verbs, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1985), Lexical Semantics in Review: An Introduction. In B. Levin (ed.), Lexical Semantics in Review, Lexicon Project Working Papers 1, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. and Rappaport, M. (1986) The Formation of Adjectival Passives, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 623–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, A.P. (1984) On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostler, N.D.M. (1979) Case-Linking: A Theory of Case and Verb Diathesis Applied to Classical Sanskrit, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, D.M. (1978) Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis, Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, D.M. (1984), The 1-Advancement Exclusiveness Law. In D. Perlmutter and C. Rosen (eds.), Studies in Relational Grammar 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 81–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, M. and Levin, B. (1985) A Case Study in Lexical Analysis: The Locative Alternation, ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, M. and Levin, B. (1988) What to Do with Theta-Roles In W. Wilkins (ed.), Thematic Relations, Academic Press, New York, pp. 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport Hovav, M. and Levin, B. (1992)-er Nominals: Implications for a Theory of Argument Structure. In E. Wehrli and T. Stowell (eds.), Syntax and the Lexicon, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz-Norman, L. (1976) The Grammar of ‘Content’ and ‘Container’, Journal of Linguistics 12, 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, R.W. (1985) Deriving the Lexicon, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T. (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1985) Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description 3, Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. (1984) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, T. (1977), Transformations and the Lexicon. In P. Culicover, A. Akmajian and T. Wasow (eds.), (1977), pp. 327-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1981) Argument Structure and Morphology, The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta, M.L. (1987) Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rappaport, M., Levin, B., Laughren, M. (1993). Levels of Lexical Representation. In: Pustejovsky, J. (eds) Semantics and the Lexicon. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1972-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1972-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-2386-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1972-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics