Advertisement

Where are the Broad Lines in Seyfert 2S?

  • Roberto Cid FernandesJr.
  • Roberto Terlevich

Abstract

The unified model for Seyfert 2s postulates that these galaxies are in fact normal Seyfert is whose innermost regions are hidden from a direct view by an opaque torus. Galaxies seen from a line-of-sight within the opening angle of this torus have the central continuum source and the Broad Line Region unobstructed, and are classified as Seyfert 1/QSO. In Seyfert 2s, on the other hand, periscopic views of the hidden nucleus may be obtained through scattering of the nuclear light in the extranuclear regions. If this model is correct, the Blue and Featureless Continuum observed in many Seyfert 2s is simply a mirror image of the obscured nucleus. In this case, the light from the Broad Line Region must also be reflected towards the observer. Seyfert 2s should therefore exhibit broad lines in their spectrum, which, by definition, they do not! In this contribution we examine this issue and the complications it brings to the basic unification picture of Seyfert galaxies. We fail to find a consistent explanation for this question in the framework of the unified model. An alternative “modified-unified model” for Seyfert 2s is proposed.

Keywords

Unify Model Equivalent Width Broad Line Seyfert Galaxy Broad Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonucci, R. R. J., Miller, J. S.: 1985, Astroph. J. 297, 621.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caganoff, S. et al..: 1991, Astroph. J. 377, L9.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cid Femandes, R. and Terlevich, R.: 1992, in: Filippenko, A.V. (ed.), Relationships between Starburst and Active Galaxies, Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Series, Vol. 31, p. 241.Google Scholar
  4. Cid Fernandes, R. and Terlevich, R.: 1993, (in preparation).Google Scholar
  5. Goodrich, R. W.: 1989, Astroph. J. 342, 224.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodrich, R. W., Miller, J. S.: 1989, Astroph. J. 346, L21.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Khachikian, E. Ye. and Weedman, D.W.: 1974, Astroph. J. 192, 581.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kinney, A. L., Antonucci, R. R., Ward, M. J. et al.: 1991, Astroph. J. 377 100.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kruper, J. S., Urry, C. M. and Canizares, C. R.: 1990, Astroph. J. Suppl. 74, 347.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Linds, R. et al.: 1991, Astroph. J. 369, L31.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin, P. G., Thompson, I. B., Maza, J.et al.: 1983 Astroph. J. 266, 470.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCarthy, P. J.: 1992, in: Filippenko, A.V. (ed.), Relationships between Starburst and Active Galaxies, Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Series, Vol. 31, p. 403.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, J. S., Goodrich, R. W.: 1990, Astroph. J. 355, 456.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, J. S., Goodrich, R. W. and Matthews, W. G.: 1991, Astroph. J. 378, 47.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shields, J. and Filippenko, A.: 1988, Astroph. J. 332, L55.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Terlevich, E., Diaz, A. I., Terlevich, R.: 1990, Monthly Not. Roy. Asir. Soc. 242, 271.ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Villa-Villaró, B., Perez-Fournon, I. and Gonzales-Serrano, I.: 1993, Astroph. J. Letters (submitted).Google Scholar
  18. Wilson, A.: 1992, in Duschl, W. J. and Wagner S. J. (eds.) The Physics of AGN, Springer Verlag, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Cid FernandesJr.
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roberto Terlevich
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of AstronomyCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Royal Greenwich ObservatoryCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations