Advertisement

The Context of Scepticism

  • Beverley C. Southgate
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales D’Histoire Des Idés book series (ARCH, volume 134)

Abstract

If the political component of Blackloism may be interpreted as a Catholic bid for security at a time of unprecedented instability and flux, the philosophical and scientific aspects of White’s work may be seen as parallel and complementary quests for certainty in the wider context of intellectual chaos1 at the time. The intellectual uncertainty to which White was responding derived largely from two related factors — the revival of sceptical philosophy, and the challenge to traditional scholasticism. These two will be considered in Chapters 8 and 9 respectively, and will provide some parameters within which, in subsequent chapters, to discuss White’s work.

Keywords

Christian Faith Natural Theologian Christian Theology Syllogistic Reasoning Sceptical Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 2.
    C.B. Schmitt, Aristotle and the Renaissance (London, 1983), ch. 1Google Scholar
  2. 2a.
    E. Grant, ‘Ways to interpret the terms ‘Aristotelian’and ‘Aristotelianism’ in Medieval and Renaissance Natural Philosophy’, History of Science 25, 1987, 335–58.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, transl. R.D. Hicks (2 vols.; London, 1979, 1980), II.IX.63, 66–68.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Flintoff, ‘Pyrrho and India’, Phronesis 25, 1980, 88–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B.C. Southgate, “‘Ataraxia” or “Angst”? Pyrrho’s aims and achievements’, Skepsis 1, 1990, 7–26.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas White, An Exclusion of Scepticks from all Title to Dispute (English transl., London, 1665), Preface.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas Stanley, History of Philosophy (3 vols.; London, 1655–62).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lord Edward Herbert, De Religione Laici (1645), ed. H.R. Hutcheson (New Haven, 1944), p. 87.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Hill, A Turbulent, Seditious, and Factious People: John Bunyan and his church, 1628–1688 (Oxford, 1988), p. 75.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.M. Frame ed., The Complete Works of Montaigne (London, 1958), pp. 318–457.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Thomas Browne, Religio Medici (n.p., 1642), in Works ed. G. Keynes (4 vols.; London, 1964), I.83.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Henry More, Antidote against Atheism (London, 1653), in C.A. Patrides ed., The Cambridge Platonists (London, 1969), p. 214.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Samuel Parker, A Free and Impartial Censure of the Platonick Philosophie (Oxford, 1666), p. 44.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Walter Charleton, in Letters and Poems in honour of the incomparable Princess, Margaret, Duchess of Newcastle (London, 1676), pp. 111–12; cf. Physiologia, pp. 341–42.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    Pierre Bayle, Historical and Critical Dictionary, ed. R.H. Popkin (New York, 1965), pp. 195, 204–7 (my emphasis).Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    H. Baker, The Wars of Truth (London, 1952), p. 146.Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    Jeremy Taylor, Ductor Dubitantium (2 vols.; London, 1660), I.231.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    Richard Burthogge, Organum Vetus et Novum (London, 1678), p. 48.Google Scholar
  19. 23.
    John Toland, Christianity not mysterious (London, 1696), subtitle.Google Scholar
  20. 25.
    John Wilkins, Of the Principles and Duties of Natural Religion (London, 1675), pp. 1, 395, 407.Google Scholar
  21. 26.
    John Owen, Animadversions on a Treatise Intituled Fiat Lux (London, 1662), pp. 148–9.Google Scholar
  22. 27.
    Sir Roger L’Estrange, Citt and Bumpkin (London, 1680), Part 2, p. 15.Google Scholar
  23. 31.
    C.B. Brush ed., The Selected Works of Pierre Gassendi (New York and London, 1972), p. 327.Google Scholar
  24. 32.
    Jean Lacombe, letter to Mersenne, 3 October 1640; quoted by Dear, Mersenne, p. 204.Google Scholar
  25. 35.
    Richard Hooker, Lawes of Ecclesiastical Politie (London, 1593–97), I.6.Google Scholar
  26. 35a.
    W.A. Wallace, ‘The Certitude of Science in Late Medieval and Renaissance Thought’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 3, 1986, 281–91.Google Scholar
  27. 36.
    G.A.J. Rogers, ‘The Basis of Belief. Philosophy, Science and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England’, History of European Ideas 6, 1985, 22, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 37.
    Mersenne, Les Questions theologiques, physiques, morales et mathématiques (Paris, 1634), p. 11Google Scholar
  29. 37a.
    R.H. Popkin, The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1979), p. 137.Google Scholar
  30. 42.
    Robert Boyle, The Sceptical Chymist, in The Works, ed. T. Birch (6 vols.; London, 1772), 1.591Google Scholar
  31. 42a.
    S. Shapin and S. Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle; and the experimental life (Princeton, 1985), p. 67.Google Scholar
  32. 43.
    Isaac Newton, Principia, ed. F. Cajori (2 vols.; Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1966), II.546.Google Scholar
  33. 54.
    H.G. Van Leeuwen, The Problem of Certainty in English Thought, 1630–1690 (The Hague, 1963).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beverley C. Southgate
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HertfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations