Abstract
The Emergency Core Coolant (ECC) is injected in the reactor cold legs to flow down the downcomer and to cool the hot core during a Large Break Loss of Coolant Accident. The ECC flows down in the downcomer before reaching the core entrance. The delivery of ECC to the core is critical to the safety. The portion of ECC not delivered to the core is bypassed to the break. Linearly scaled small test facilities have been designed to determine ECC delivery rates for the Nuclear Power Plants (NPP). However, based on the data, it is concluded that linearly scaled small facilities do not capture the phenomena of the NPP. In the small facilities the liquid distribution facilities is a combination of pure film and liquid slugs. In the full scale facilities the ECC flows as a column beneath the cold legs almost unaffected by the pressure of the gas. In addition, the correlation recommended by the USNRC for NPP based on scaled facilities underpredicts the ECC delivery rate when compared to the data from Upper Plenum Test facility which is a full scale test facility.It is recommended that the ECC bypass phenomena experiments be performed in full scale facilities.
This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beckner, W. D. and Reyes, J. N., Jr., 1981. “PWR Lower Plenum Refill Research Results,” US NRC Research Information Letter No. 128, December 8.
Crowley, C. J., Block, J. A. and Cary, C. N., 1977. “Downcomer Effects in a 1/15-Scale PWR Geometry -Experimental Data Report,” NUREG-0281, May.
Crowley, C. J., Block, J. A. and Roth, P. H., 1979. “First Quarter FY 1979 Progress Report on Refill Effects Program,” NUREG/CR-0719, April.
Crowley C. J. and Sam, R. G., 1980. “Experimental Facility and Typical Results for Flushing Transients at 1/5-Scale,” CREARE/TM-707, July.
Cudnik, R. A., Flanigan, L. J., Carbiener, W. A., Wooton, R. O. and Denning, R. S., 1977. “Penetration Behavior in a 1/15-Scale Model of a Four-Loop Pressurized Water Reactor,” BMI-NUREG-1973,June.
Cudnik, R. A., Flanigan, L. J., Dykhuizen, R. C, Carbiener, W. A. and Liu, J. S., 1978. “Baseline Plenum Filling Behavior in a 2/15-Scale Model of a Four Loop Pressurized Water Reactor,” NUREG/CR-0069, April.
Delhaye, J. M., Giot, M. and Riethamuller, M. L., 1981. “Ther-mohydraulics of Two-Phase Systems for Industrial Design and Nuclear Engineering,” Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
Dimenna, R. A. et al., 1988. “RELAP5/MOD2 Models and Correlations,”NUREG/CR-5194, August.
Liebert, J., 1988. “UPTF-Experiment, Downcomer CCF Test No. 6,” Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, UB KWU, May 9 -13, 2D/3D Coordination Meeting, Tokai-Mura, Japan.
Liles, D., et al, 1988. “TRAC-PF1/M0D1 Correlations and Models,”NUREG/CR-5069, December.
MPR Associates, 1990. “Summary of Results from UPTF Down-comer Separate Effects Tests, Comparisons to Previous Scaled Tests and Application to U.S. Pressurized Water Reactors,” MPR-1163, July.
Neymotin, L. Y. and Rohatgi, U. S., 1988. “Scale Effects in ECC Bypass Phenomena,” Research Programs Sponsored by Research Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Section 25.2, NUREG/CR-2331, Vol. 8, January-June.
Pushkina O. L. and Sorokin, Y. L., 1969. “Breakdown of Liquid Film Motion in Vertical Tubes,” Heat Transfer, Soviet Research,Vol. 1, No. 5, September.
Richter, H. J., 1977. “The Effect of Scale on Two-Phase Coun-tercurrent Flow Flooding in Vertical Tubes,” Final Report on Contract No. AT(49–24)-0329, 03755, Thayer School of Engineering,Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Rohatgi, U. S., Neymotin, L. Y., Jo, J. and Wulff, W., 1990. “Bias in Peak Clad Temperature Predictions Due to Uncertainties in Modelling of ECC Bypass and Dissolved Non-Condensable Gas Phenomena,” NUREG/CR-5254, September.
Rothe P. H. and Crowley, C. J., 1978. “Scaling of Pressure and Subcooling for Countercurrent Flow,” NUREG/CR-0464, October.
Sam, R. G. and Crowley, C. J., 1981. “Experimental Data Report for Flushing Transients,” NUREG/CR-2060 (CREARE TN-330).
Segev, A., Flanigan, L. J. and Collier, R. P., 1980. “Steam-Water Mixing and System Hydrodynamics Program -Task 4,” NUREG/CR-1657, August.
Zuber, N., et al., 1990. “Quantifying Reactor Safety Margins, Part 5, Evaluation of Scale-Up Capabilities of Best Estimate Codes,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 119, pp. 97–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rohatgi, U.S., Neymotin, L.Y. (1993). Assessment of Scaling of Pressurized Water Reactor Emergency Core Coolant Bypass Flow Tests. In: Ashpis, D.E., Gatski, T.B., Hirsh, R. (eds) Instabilities and Turbulence in Engineering Flows. Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1743-2_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1743-2_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4764-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1743-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive