Abstract
The effect of different spatial covariance parameters; range, covariance model, anisotropy direction and ratio on important reservoir engineering parameters such as breakthrough time, fractional flow of oil and oil recovery as a function of pore volumes injected is examined. The study is conducted for situations where the range of spatial continuity of permeability is smaller than the well spacing, meaning it cannot be detected through the calculation of an experimental variogram. This is a relatively common occurrence for even well developed oil reservoirs. The impact of the different parameters on the flow behavior is analyzed using a hybrid finite-difference/streamtube approach for the fluid displacement simulations. The permeability and porosity grids are generated using both Gaussian based conditional simulation techniques and non-parametric methods such as indicators. Some of the results indicate that Gaussian simulation techniques are not suitable for fluid flow predictions while the choice of the variogram type (exponential, Gaussian or spherical) is unimportant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Grant, C. W., Goggin, D. J., and Harris, P. M., “Permeability Variation in Carbonate Parasequences and its Effect on Viscous Dominated Flow Behavior”, GSA abstract, San Diego, CA, Oct. 21–24, 1991
Tyler, N., Barton, M. D. and Finley, R. J., “Outcrop Quantification of Flow-Unit Sand Properties and Geometries, Ferron Sandstone, Utah”, presented at 75th AAPG annual convention, Dallas, TX, April 7–10, 1991.
Araktingi, U. G. and Orr, F. M., “Viscous Fingering in Porous Media”, SPE 18095 presented at the 63rd Annual Technical Conference of SPE, Houston, TX, Oct. 2–5, 1988.
Hewett, T. A. and Behrens, R. E., “Sealing Laws in Reservoir Simulation and Their Use in a Hybrid Finite Difference/Streamtube Approach to Simulating the Effects of Permeability Heterogeneity”, Reservoir Characterization II, Academic Press, 1991, pp.402–941.
Tang, R. W., Behrens, R. E. and Emanuel, A. S., “Reservoir Studies with Geostatistics to Forecast Performance”, SPERE (May 1991) 253–258.
Alabert, F. G., “The Practice of Fast Conditional Simulations through the LU Decomposition of the Covariance Matrix”, Mathematical Geology, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1987.
Alabert, F. G., “Stochastic Imaging of Spatial Distribution using Hard and Soft Information”, M. Sc. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 197 pp. (1987).
Jones, D. S., Elementary Information Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford p.137 (1979).
Deutsch, C. W. and Journel, A. G., “GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library, User’s Guide”, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Araktingi, U.G. (1993). A Sensitivity Analysis of Geostatistical Parameters on Oil Recovery Predictions. In: Soares, A. (eds) Geostatistics Tróia ’92. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1739-5_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1739-5_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-2157-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1739-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive