Skip to main content

Metaphysics and Scientific Proof: Newton and Hegel

  • Chapter

Abstract

In the “general scholium” of the Principia, Newton announces that the universal law of gravitation was “deduced from the phenomena”.1 We can better comprehend this claim by following Dorling’s schema for “demonstrative induction”. Dorling’s schema alone, however, will not be enough. In order to follow Newton’s deduction we will need to recognize the role of what Hegel calls “an unspeakable metaphysics” that appears in the form of Newton’s “rules of reasoning in philosophy”. Our reflections will allow us to find at least three lines of well founded criticism in Hegel’s critique of Newton’s derivation of the universal law of gravitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The author would like to acknowledge several valuable discussions with Alan Musgrave. Needless to say the author is totally responsible for any errors.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dorling, J. 1970; 1971; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dorling, J. 1973, p. 360.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorling, J. 1973, pp. 360-361.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dorling, J. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pemberton, H. 1728, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yolton, J.W. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pemberton, H. 1728, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hegel WL II.466; tr. Miller p. 808.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hegel WL II.473; tr. Miller p. 814.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hegel WL II.474; tr. Miller p. 815.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hegel WL II.473-474; tr. Miller pp. 814-815.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hegel WL I.277; tr. Miller p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hegel Encyclopedia § 270 Remark; tr. Miller p. 66; tr. Petry I.264,26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hegel Encyclopedia § 38 Remark; tr. Wallace p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hegel Encyclopedia § 98 Remark; tr. Wallace p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hegel Encyclopedia § 98 Remark; tr. Wallace p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hegel Encyclopedia § 270 Remark; tr. Miller p. 67; tr. Petry I.265, 18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Michael John Petry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garrison, J.W. (1993). Metaphysics and Scientific Proof: Newton and Hegel. In: Petry, M.J. (eds) Hegel and Newtonianism. Archives Internationales D’Histoire Des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 136. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1662-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1662-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4726-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1662-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics