Abstract
Is is suggested that in order to agree on a paradigm of personality, it is necessary to have agreed criteria. It is argued that factor analysis is not sufficient to provide a proper answer, and that genetic and psychophysiological antecedents and experimental and social outcomes of behavior characteristic of the major dimensions of personality are needed to complete any proper theory of personality. These constitute the distal and proximal causes and effects of such behaviors, and give meaning and relevance to the otherwise purely abstract traits “discovered” by correlational studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnes, B. (1982) T.S. Kuka and social science. London: Macmillan.
Barrett P. and Eysenck S.B.G. 1984 The assessment of personality factors across 25 countries. Personality and Individual Differences 5 615–632
Baruch I., Hemsley, D.R. and Gray, J.E. (1988) Latent inhibition and “psychotic proneness” in normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 777–784.
Claridge, G.S. (1985) Origins of mental illness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Claridge, G.S. and Chappa, H.J. (1973) Psychoticism: A study of its biological nature in normal subjects. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 175–187.
Claridge G., Robinson, D.L. and Birchall, P. (1983) Characteristics of schizophrenics’ and neurotics’ relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 651–664.
Coleman, J.A. (1980) Personality and stress in the shooting sports. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 24, 287–296.
Cronbach, L.J. (1957) The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
Cronbach, L.J. and Meehl, P. (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
De Raad, B. (1992) The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 15–29.
Digman, J.M. (1990) Personality structure: Emergence of the Big-Five model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
Eaves, L.J., Eysenck, H.J. and Martin, N. (1989) Genes, culture and personality: An Empirical Approach. New York: Academic Press.
Eysenck, H.J. (1952) The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Eysenck, H.J. (1967) The biological basis of personality. Springfield: C.C. Thomas.
Eysenck, H.J. (1971) Personality and social adjustment. British Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 553–808.
Eysenck, H.J. (1976) Sex and personality. London: Open Books.
Eysenck, H.J. (1977) Crime and personality. (3rd Ed.) London: Paladin.
Eysenck, H.J. (1978) The development of personality and its relation to learning. In: S. Murray (Ed.), Melbourne Studies in Education, 134–181. Melbourne University Press.
Eysenck, H.J. (1980) Man as a biosocial animal: Comments on the sociobiology debate. Political Psychology, 2, 43–51.
Eysenck, H.J. (1980b) The biosocial model of man and the unification of psychology. In: A.J. Chapman and P.M. Jones (Eds.), Models of Man. London: British Psychological Society.
Eysenck, H.J. (1983a) Is there a paradigm in personality research? Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 369–397.
Eysenck, H.J. (1983b) The social application of Pavlovian theories. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 18, 117–125.
Eysenck, H.J. (1983c) A biometrical-genetical analysis of impulsive and sensation-seeking behaviour. In: M. Zuckerman (Ed.), Biological Bases of Sensation-Seeking, Impulsivity, and Anxiety. Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum.
Eysenck, H.J. (1983d) The roots of creativity: cognitive ability or personality trait? Roeper Review, 5, 10–12.
Eysenck, H.J. (1984) The place of individual differences in a scientific psychology. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 1, 233–286.
Eysenck, H.J. (1985) The place of theory in a world of facts. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 3, 17–72.
Eysenck, H.J. (1990) Biological dimensions of personality. In: L.A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 244–276.
Eysenck, H.J. (1991a) Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–790.
Eysenck, H.J. (1991b) Smoking, personality and stress: Psychosocial factors in the prevention of cancer and coronary heart disease. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, H.J. (1992) The definition and measurement of psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, in press.
Eysenck, H.J. (1993a) Personality: Biological Foundations. In: P.A. Vernon (Ed.), Handbook of the neuropsychology of individual differences. New York: Academic Press.
Eysenck, H.J. (1993b) Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, in press.
Eysenck, H.J. and Eysenck, S.B.G. (1976) Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Eysenck, H.J. and Eysenck, M.W. (1985) Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, H.J. and Gudjonsson, G. (1989) The causes and cures of criminality. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, H.J., Nias, D.K.B. and Cox, D.N. (1982) Sport and personality. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 1–56.
Garber, J. and Strassberg, Z. (1991) Construct validity: History and application to developmental psychopathology. In: W.M. Grove and D. Ciocetti (Eds.), Personality and Psychopathology, 219–258. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Goldberg, L.R. (1982) From ace to Zambia: some explorations in the language of personality. In: C.D. Spielberger and J.N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in Personality Assessment, I, 203–234. Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum.
Goldberg, L.R. (1990) An alternative “description of personality”; the Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.
Goldberg, L.R. and Rosolack, T.K. (1992) Pitting the Big-Five Structure against its competitors: An empirical comparison with Eysenck’s P-E-N model. In: C.F. Halverson, G.A. Kohnstamm, and R.P. Martin (Eds.). The Developing Structure of Temperament and Personality from Infancy to Adulthood. New York: Erlbaum.
Howarth, E. and Eysenck, H.J. (1968) Extraversion, arousal, and paired-associate recall. Experimental Research in Personality, 3, 114–116.
Lubow, R.E. (1989) Latent inhibition and conditional attention theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lubow, R.E., Ingberg-Sacks Y., Zabstein-Orda, N. and Gewirtz, J.C. (1992) Latent inhibition in low and high “psychotic-prone” normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 563–572.
McCrae, R.R. (1992) Openness to experience as a basic dimension of personality. Presented at the Symposium “Intelligence and Openness in the Big Five Personality Structure”, at the APA Convention in Washington, DC.
Richards R.L. 1981 Relationship between creativity and psychopathology An evaluation and interpretation of the evidence. Genetic Psychology Mographs 103 261–32
Sokal, R. and Sneath, P. (1963) Principles of numerical taxonomy. London: Freeman.
Zuckerman, M. (1991) Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eysenck, H.J. (1993). From DNA to Social Behaviour: Conditions for a Paradigm of Personality Research. In: Hettema, J., Deary, I.J. (eds) Foundations of Personality. NATO ASI Series, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1660-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1660-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4725-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1660-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive