Skip to main content

Biological and Social Approaches to Individuality: Towards a Common Paradigm

  • Chapter
Foundations of Personality

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 72))

Abstract

This paper introduces and partly summarizes the different contributions of this volume. After a brief introduction of the biological and social approaches to personality, we argue that an integrative framework is to be preferred over competing approaches. A common framework is outlined for the joint study of biological and social determinants of individuality. The basis for this framework is sought in the (more distal or more proximal) relationships between several determinants of individuality on the one hand, and personality as appearing in daily life on the other. Different levels of explanation are forwarded, each delivering a specific contribution to personality as a whole. To study personality within this framework, specific conceptual units and specific measures are required at different levels of inquiry. Also, the definition of personality traits needs revision to include distal elements in addition to the commonly used proximal elements. Finally, some attention is paid to major research strategies within this framework, as well as some of the the problems to be faced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramson, L.Y., Seligman, M.E.P., and Teasdale, J.D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G.W. (1958). What units shall we employ? In: G. Lindzey (Ed) The assessment of motives. New York: Rinehart, pp. 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, N. (1988) Personality: In Search of Individuality. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 459–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M. and Cantor, N. (Eds)(1989). Personality psychology. Recent trends and emerging directions. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I.J. and Matthews, G. (in press) Personality traits are alive and well. The Psychologist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T., Ayala, F.J., Stebbins, G.L. and Valentine, J.W. (1977). Evolution. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N. (1990) A social psychology of reputation. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, 171–194). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R.A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H.J. (Ed.)(1981). A model for personality. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H.J. and Rachman, S. (1965). Causes and cures of neurosis. London: Rutledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C.S. and Lindzey, G. (1970). Theories of personality. (Second edition). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, S. (1988) The Construction of Personality: An Introduction (Second Edition). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettema, P.J. and Kenrick, D.T. (1989). Biosocial interaction and individual adaptation. In: P.J. Hettema (Ed). Personality and environment. Assessment of human adaptation. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettema, P.J. and Kenrick, D.T. (1992) Models of person-situation interactions. In: G.V. Caprara and G.L. Van Heck (Eds.) Modern personality psychology. Critical reviews and new directions. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf, pp. 393–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G.R., Gaillard, A.W., and Coles, M.G. (Eds)(1986) Energetics and human information processing. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhof.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M.J.A (1988) Intelligence as an explanation. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D.T. (1987). Gender, genes, and the social environment: A biosocial interactonist perspective. In: P.C. Shaver and C. Hendrick (Eds). Review of personality and social psychology. Newbury Park CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D.T., Montello, D.R., and MacFarlane, S. (1985). Personality: social learning, social cognition, or sociobiology? In: R. Hogan and W.H. Jones (Eds.) Perspectives in personality. Volume I. Greenwich, Co: JAI Press, pp. 201–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (1990). Personality development from an interactional perspective. In: L. Pervin (Ed.) Handbook of personality theory and research. New York: Guilford, pp. 194–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel W. 1973 Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review 80 252–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R. (1986) Behavior genetic methods. Journal of Personality, 54, 226–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin R., DeFries, J.C., and Loehlin, J.C. (1977). Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M.E.P. and Maier, S.F. (1967). Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H.A. 1992. What is an “Explanation” of behavior-Psychological Science 3 150–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1990) Metaphors of Mind: Conceptions of the Nature of Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. (1966) An abilities conception of personality: Some implications for personality measurement. American Psychologist, 21, 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J.C. and Mischel, W. (1987) A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1159–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1979) Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1991) Psychobiology of Personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hettema, J., Deary, I.J. (1993). Biological and Social Approaches to Individuality: Towards a Common Paradigm. In: Hettema, J., Deary, I.J. (eds) Foundations of Personality. NATO ASI Series, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1660-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1660-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4725-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1660-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics