Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Series Entomologica ((SENT,volume 49))

  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

Polyphagous species that are generalists at the level of the individual have the option to forage optimally among plant species with different nutrient profiles. This is presumed to be an underlying reason why availability of mixtures of food plants often leads to better performance than does feeding on single food plants (Bernays & Lee, 1988). The possibility that grasshoppers select different plants in relation to particular dietary needs, has also been suggested on the basis of their abilities to do so with complementary artificial diets (Simpson & Simpson, 1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bernays, E.A. & J.C. Lee (1988). Food aversion learning in the polyphagous grasshopper Schistocerca americana (Drury). Physiol. Entomol. 13: 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E.A. & D. Raubenheimer (1991). Dietary mixing in grasshoppers: changes in acceptability of different plant secondary compounds associated with low levels of dietary protein. J. Insect Behay. 4 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E.A., K.L. Bright, J.J. Howard & D. Champagne (1992). Variety is the spice of life: frequent switching between foods in the polyphagous grasshopper Taeniopoda eques. Anim. Behay. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, D. & E.A. Bernays (1991). Phytosterol unsuitability as a factor mediating food aversion learning in the grasshopper Schistocerca americana. Physiol. Entomol. 16 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R.F. (1954). Responses of Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R.&F.) to light in the laboratory. British J. Anim. Behay. 2: 146–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raubenheimer, D. & E.A. Bernays (1992). Feeding patterns in the polyphagous grasshopper Taeniopoda eques: a field study. Anim. Behay. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S.J. & C. Simpson (1990). Mechanisms of nutritional compensation by phytophagous insects. In: E.A. Bernays (ed.), Plant-Insect Interactions Vol. II, pp. 111–160. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S.J. & P. White (1991). Associative learning and locust feeding: evidence for a “learned hunger” for protein. Anim. Behay. 40 506–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S.J., M.S.J. Simmonds, A.R. Wheatly & E.A.Bernays (1988). The control of meal termination in the locust. Anim. Behay. 36: 1216–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bernays, E.A. (1992). Dietary mixing in generalist grasshoppers. In: Menken, S.B.J., Visser, J.H., Harrewijn, P. (eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships. Series Entomologica, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1654-1_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1654-1_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4723-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1654-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics