Advertisement

The major histocompatibility complex

  • Miroslav Ferenčík
Chapter
  • 124 Downloads

Abstract

It has long been known that the fate of transplanted foreign cells, tissues and organs depends on genetic factors. Basic experiments concerning this problem were performed in laboratory animals, particularly in mice. The genetic basis of tissue incompatibility (histoincompatibility) was demonstrated in inbred animal strains. These are homogeneous animal lines, generated by repeated crossing of brothers and sisters or parents and their progeny over many generations. When the transfer of tissue is performed between individuals of various inbred strains, the graft is generally rejected. Similarly, rejection occurs after tissue transplantation between individuals of normal non-inbred (outbred) populations, e.g. in the human population. On the other hand, grafts transferred between individuals of the inbred line or between monozygotic twins in man, survive permanently. It has been shown that particular antigens are responsible for tissue compatibility (histocompatibility) or incompatibility (histoincompatibility) and determine rejection or survival of the graft. These antigens are products of histocompatibility genes and are therefore called histocompatibility antigens.

Keywords

Major Histocompatibility Complex Transmembrane Segment Histocompatibility Antigen Outer Domain Mixed Lymphocyte Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berget, S. M., Moore, C. and Sharp, P. A. (1977) Spliced segments at the 5’-terminus of adenovirus 2 late mRNA. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA ,74, 3171–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billingham, R. E., Brent, L. and Medawar, P. B. (1954) Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity II. The origin, strength and duration of actively and adoptively acquired immunity. Proc. Roy. Soc. ,B 143, 58–70.Google Scholar
  3. Bodmer, J. G., Marsh, S. G. E. and Albert, E. (1990) Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, 1989. Immunol. Today ,11, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breathnach, R., Benoist, C., O’Hare, K., Gannon, F. and Chambon, P. (1978) Ovalbumin gene: Evidence for a leader sequence in mRNA and DNA sequences at the exon-intron boundaries. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA ,75, 4853–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breathnach, R., Mandell, J. L. and Chambon, P. (1977) Ovalbumin gene is split in chicken DNA. Nature ,270, 314–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buc, M. (1989) HLA complex in biology and medicine. Bratislava, Veda, 188 pp. (in Slovak).Google Scholar
  7. Buc, M. and Ferenčík M. (1993) Immunogenetics. Bratislava, Alfa, in press. (in Slovak).Google Scholar
  8. Dausset, J. (1958) Isoleuco-anticorps. Acta Haematol. (Basel), 20, 156–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dausset, J. and Pla, M. (1985) HLA complexe majeur d’histocompatibilité de l’homme. Paris, Flamarion Médicine-Science, 414 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, W. (1978) Why genes in pieces? Nature ,272, 581–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hána, I., Ivašková, E. and Dostál, C. (1982) The main histocompatibility system of man (HLA) and diseases. Prague, Avicenum, 224 pp. (in Czech).Google Scholar
  12. Hašková, V. and Buc, M. (1985) Advanced notions about the major histocompatibility complex. In: Ferencík, M. and Štefanovič, J. (eds.), Immunology 1985. Bratislava, Immunol. Sect. Czechoslov. Biol. Soc., pp. 191 -99.Google Scholar
  13. Mayr, W. R. (1990) HLA 1990. Blut ,61, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Payne, R. and Rolfs, M. R. (1958) Foeto-maternal incompatibility. J. Clin. Invest. ,37, 1756–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Snell, G. D. (1948) Methods for the study of histocompatibility genes. J. Genetics ,49, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Snell, G. D. (1958) Histocompatibility genes of the mouse. II. Production and analogs of isogenic resistant lines. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. ,21, 843–55.Google Scholar
  17. Snell, G. D. (1976) Histogenetic methods. In: Snell, G. D., Dausset, J. and Nathenson, S. (eds.), Histocompatibility. New York, Acad. Press, pp. 11–21.Google Scholar
  18. Steinmetz, M. and Hood, L. (1983) Genes of the major histocompatibility complex in mouse and man. Science ,222, 727–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steinmetz, M., Winoto, A., Hinard K. and Hood, L. (1982) Clusters of genes encoding mouse transplantation antigens. Cell ,28, 489–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tonegawa, S. (1983) Somatic generation of antibody diversity. Nature ,302, 575–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tonegawa, S., Maxam, S. M., Tizard, R., Bernard, O. and Gilbert, W. (1978) Sequence of a mouse germ-line gene for a variable region of an immunoglobulin light chain. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA ,75, 1485–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Rood, J. J., Eernise, J. G. and van Leeuwen, A. (1958) Leucocyte antibodies in sera of pregnant women. Nature ,181, 1735–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miroslav Ferenčík
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Immunology, Faculty of MedicineComenius UniversityBratislavaCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations