Abstract
The advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has had the same profound effect on medical and surgical neurology that computerized tomography (CT) had, when that modality first appeared. Compared with CT, however, MR images are both more detailed and more specific, whilst views in any axis are possible, the so-called multiplanar facility. That MRI has superseded CT in aspects of neurology is beyond doubt: yet CT continues to be a cost-effective investigation in many circumstances, and in most institutions the two modalities thrive side by side. Many patients, therefore, have undergone both types of imaging, and the diagnostic process oscillates between the terminologies of each. This assumption of parallel interpretation is made throughout the text.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clasen RA, Torack RM. Computerised tomography and neuropathologists: two viewpoints. J Neuropath Exp Neurol. 1982;41:387–90.
Schild HS. MRI made easy (well almost). Berlin: Schering; 1990.
Young SW. Magnetic resonance imaging: basic principles. New York: Raven Press; 1988.
Zagzag D, Goldenberg G, Brem S. Angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier breakdown modulate CT enhancement: an experimental study in a rabbit brain-tumour model. AJNR. 1989;10:529–34.
Fullerton GD. Physiologic basis of magnetic relaxation. In: Stark DD, Bradley WD, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging. St Louis: Mosby; 1988:36–55.
Ehman R L. Interpretation of magnetic resonance images. In: Berquist TH, ed. MRI of the musculoskeletal system, 2nd edn. New York: Raven Press; 1990:27–51.
Ehman RL, Kjos BO, Hricak H et al. Relative intensity of abdominal organs in magnetic resonance images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985;9:315–19.
Vogler JB, Murphy WA. Diffuse marrow diseases. In: Berquist TH, ed. MRI of the musculoskeletal system, 2nd edn. New York: Raven Press; 1990:491–516.
Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS et al. Degenerative disc disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;166:193–9.
Fullerton GD, Cameron IL, Ord VA. Frequency dependence of magnetic resonance spin-lattice relaxation of protons in biological materials. Radiology. 1984;151:135–8.
Klatzo I. Cerebral edema and ischemia. Recent Adv Neuropathol. 1979;1:26–39.
Som PM, Dillon WP, Fullerton GD et al. Chronically obstructed sinonasal secretions: observations on T1 and T2 shortening. Radiology. 1989;172:515–20.
Egelhof JC, Ross JS, Modic MT et al. MR imaging of metastatic GI adenocarcinoma in brain. AJNR. 1992;13:1221–4.
Hirano A, Matsui T. Vascular structures in brain tumors. Hum Pathol. 1975;6(5):611–21.
Barkovich AJ, Atlas SW. Magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial haemorrhage. Radiol Clin N Am. 1988;26:801–20.
Chaney RK, Taber KH, Orrison WW et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of intracerebral hemorrhage at different field strengths. A review of reported intraparenchymal signal intensities. In: Hayman LA, Taber KH, eds. Neuroimaging clinics of North America. Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992:2:25–51.
Thulborn KR, Atlas SW. Intracranial haemorrhage. In: Atlas SW, ed. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. New York: Raven Press; 1991:175–222.
Leestma JE, Martin E. An electron probe and histochemical study of the ferruginated neurone. Arch Pathol. 1968;122:597–605.
Duchen LW. General pathology of neurones and neuroglia. In: Hume Adams J, Duchen LW, eds. Greenfield’s neuropathology. London: Edward Arnold; 1992:1–52.
Holland BA, Kucharcyzk W, Brant-Zawadzki M et al. MR imaging of calcified intracranial lesions. Radiology. 1985;157:353–6.
Chen JC, Hardy PA, Clauberg M et al. T2 values in the human brain: comparison of quantitative assays of iron and ferritin. Radiology. 1989;173:521–6.
Thulborn KR, Sorenson AG, Kowall NW et al. The role of ferritin and hemosiderin in the MR appearance of cerebral hemorrhage: a histopathologic biochemical study in rats. AJNR. 1990;11:291–7.
Boyko OB, Burger PC, Shelburne JD et al. Non-heme mechanisms for T1 shortening: pathologic, CT and MR elucidation. AJNR. 1992;13:1439–45.
Cote RA, Robboy S. Progress in medical information management. Systematised nomenclature of medicine (SNOMED). JAMA. 1980;243(8):756–62.
Yousem DM. Dashed hopes for MR imaging of the head and neck: the power of the needle. Radiology. 1992;184:25–6.
Adams JH, Graham DI, Doyle D. Brain biopsy: the smear technique for neurosurgical biopsies. London: Chapman and Hall; 1980.
Esiri MM, Oppenheimer DR. Diagnostic neuropathology: A practical manual. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 G. S. Rutherfoord and R. H. Hewlett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rutherfoord, G.S., Hewlett, R.H. (1994). Introduction to neuroimaging, diagnostic approach, smear technique and principles. In: Atlas of Correlative Surgical Neuropathology and Imaging. Current Histopathology, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1434-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1434-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4628-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1434-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive