Abstract
Much like the long standing debate over the relationship between the major works of Adam Smith, an energetic discussion has emerged over the past twenty or so years regarding the relationship between the major texts of John Maynard Keynes. A subsection of the larger discussion is an investigation into the process which led Keynes to modify or abandon the framework of the Treatise on Money (1930) and write The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money(1936). 1 Like the Smith scholarship, this debate is about much more than it initially appears to be. The actual discussion is, indirectly, about identifying and defining what is original and unique to The General Theory.
Article Footnote
Even as we make these comments we should recall that some important interpreters argue that these books actually constitute one argument and should be treated as such (Shackle, 1974).However, the text does reflect the view that there has been an important, and moreover, identifiable evolution in the period between these two texts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amadeo, Edward J. (1989)Keynes’s Principle of Effective Demand.Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.
Carvalho, Fernando J. C. (1983–84) “The Concept of Time in Shacklean and Sraffian Economics.”Journal of Post Keynesian Economics.3:2 (Winter), 158–69.
Carvalho, Fernando J. C. (1987) “Alternative Analyses of Short and Long Run inPost-Keynesian Economics.” In Randy Albelda, Christopher Gunn and William Waller (eds.).Alternatives to Economic Orthodoxy.Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Carvalho, Fernando J. C. (1990) “Keynes and the Long Period.”Cambridge Journalof Economics.14, 277–290.
Clarke, Peter. (1988)The Keynesian Revolution in the Making 1924–1936.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davidson, Paul. (1989) “Patinkin’s Interpretation of Keynes and the Keynesian Cross.”History of Political Economy.21: 3, 737–741.
Dillard, Dudley. (1954) “The Theory of a Monetary Economy.” In Kenneth Kurihara (ed.).Post Keynesian Economics.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 3–30.
Eatwell, John. (1983) “The Long-Period Theory of Employment.”Cambridge Journal of Economics.7, 269–285.
Dillard, Dudley.and Murray Milgate. (1983) “Introduction.” In John Eatwell and Murray Milgate, (eds.)Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution.New York: Oxford University Press, 1–17.
Fusfeld, Daniel R. (1985) “Keynes and the Keynesian Cross: A Note.”History of Political Economy17: 3, 385–388.
Fusfeld, Daniel R. (1989) “Keynes and the Keynesian Cross: Reply to Don Patinkin.”History of Political Economy21: 3, 545–547.
Garegnani, Piero. (1983) “On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Work on Value and Distribution” in John Eatwell and Murray Milgate (eds.)Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution.New York: Oxford University Press, 29–145.
Hansen, Alvin. (1936) “Mr. Keynes on Underemployment Equilibrium.”Journal of Political Economy.(October), 667–686.
Harrod, R. F. (1947) “Keynes and the Traditional Theory.”Econometrica(1937), reprinted in Seymour E. HarrisThe New Economics.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Keynes, John Maynard. (1963)Essays in Biography.Geoffrey Keynes (ed.) New York: Norton.
Keynes, John Maynard. (1964)The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money.New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Keynes, John Maynard. (1971)Treatise on Money: The Pure Theory of Money. Volume V in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes.London: Macmillan.
Keynes, John Maynard. (1973)The General Theory and After: Part 1 Preparation. Volume XIII of The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes.Donald Moggridge (ed.) London: Macmillan.
Klein, Lawrence R. (1966)The Keynesian Revolution.2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
Kregel, Jan. (1980) “Markets and Institutions as Features of a Capitalistic Production System.”Journal of Post Keynesian Economics.Vol. 3, #1, (Fall), 32–48.
Lerner, Abba P. (1947) “Mr. Keynes’ ‘General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money’.”International Labor Review(1936), reprinted in Seymour E. HarrisThe New Economics.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Littleboy, Bruce and Ghanshyam Mehta. (1987) “Patinkin on Keynes’ Theory of Effective Demand,”History of Political Economy.19:2, 311–328.
Milgate, Murray. (1982)Capital and Employment: A Study of Keynes’s Economics.New York: Academic Press.
Moggridge, Donald E. (1973) “The Cambridge Circus, 1930–1,” in Volume XIII ofThe Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes337–343.
Moggridge, Donald E. (1976)John Maynard Keynes.New York: Penguin.
Moggridge, Donald E. (1992)Maynard Keynes: An Economist’s Biography.NewYork: Routledge.
Patinkin, Don. (1976)Keynes’ Monetary Thought: A Study of its Development.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Moggridge, Donald E. (1977a) “The Process of WritingThe General Theory:A Critical Survey.” In Don Patinkin and J. Clark Leith (eds.)Keynes Cambridge and The General Theory.London: Macmillan, 3–24.
Moggridge, Donald E. (1977b) “The Aggregate Supply Function: A Correction,”History of Political Economy.9:1, 156–159.
Moggridge, Donald E. (1978) “Keynes’ Aggregate Supply Function: A Plea for Common Sense”History of Political Economy.10:4, 577–596..
Moggridge, Donald E. (1982)Anticipations of the General Theory? and OtherEssays on Keynes.Chicago: University of Chicago Press..
Moggridge, Donald E. (1987) “Keynes’ Theory of Effective Demand: A Reply”History of Political Economy.19:4, 647–658.
Moggridge, Donald E. (1989) “Keynes and the Keynesian Cross: A Further Note.”History of Political Economy.21:3, 537–547.
Moggridge, Donald E. (1993) “John Maynard Keynes (1883–1946).” In Walter A Critique of Keynesian Economics.New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1–57.
Pigou, Arthur C. (1936) “Mr. J. M. Keynes’ General Theory of Employment,Interest and Money.Economica.Vol. III:10, (New Series), 115–132..
Pigou, Arthur C. (1951)Keynes’s General Theory: A Retrospective View.London: Macmillan.
Roberts, David. (1978) “Patinkin, Keynes, and Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis.”History of Political Economy.10:4, 549–576.
Shackle, George L. S. (1967)The Years of High Theory: Invention and Tradition in Economic Thought 1926–1939.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shackle, George L. S. (1974)Keynesian Kaleidics: The Evolution of a General Political Economy.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Shapiro, Nina. (1978) “Keynes and Equilibrium Economics.”Australian Economic Papers.17, (December), 297–223.
Skidelsky, Robert. (1992)John Maynard Keynes: The Economist as Savior 1920–1937.London, Macmillan.
Sraffa, Piero. (1960)Production of Commodities By Means of Commodities.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Townshend, Hugh. (1937) “Liquidity-Premium and the Theory of Value.”Economic Journal.47, (March), 159–169.
Yeager, Leland. (1993) “The Keynesian Heritage in Economics.” In Walter Allan (ed.)A Critique of Keynesian Economics.New York: St. Martin’s Press, 59–71.
Young, Warren. (1987)Interpreting Mr. Keynes: The IS-LM Enigma.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prasch, R.E. (1994). Edward Amadeo’s Contributions to the Interpretation of Keynes’s Economics. In: Davis, J.B. (eds) The State of Interpretation of Keynes. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1392-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1392-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4610-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1392-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive