Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 6))

  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

From the end of the nineteenth century until the 1940s Bulgarian agriculture was characterized mainly by owner-occupied, small-scale, fragmented farms. After 1946 these farms were collectivized until, in 1991, a program for land restitution was implemented with the objective of restoring property to some 1.7 million individual claimants. This complex process is expected to facilitate the re-emergence of a land market, with consequent reallocation of agricultural resources under new systems of tenure. On current evidence, however, trade in agricultural land is being impeded by the absence of secure legal title, high transaction costs of matching buyers with sellers, and problems in assessing land’s real economic worth. Continued uncertainty is expected to make leasing rather than sale characteristic of land transactions for at least the next decade. Transactions recorded to date are frequently on the basis of informal, short-term leases. The government can facilitate the emergence of an efficient land marketing system but cannot, and should not, manage it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AMIS, 1993. Report on the Census of New Farming Units. EC PHARE Programme, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S.N.S., 1969.The Theory of Share Tenancy: With Special Application to Asian Agriculture and the First Phase of Taiwan Land Reform.The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, R.J., 1983.Bulgaria 1878–1918.Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J.M., 1981.The Economic Theory of Agricultural Land Tenure.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F., 1988.Peasant Economics: Farm Households and Agrarian Development.Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge, England., Ghatak, S. and Ingersent, K., 1984.Agricultural and Economic Development.Wheatsheaf Books, Sussex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M., 1993. Notes on: Formation of Land Markets in Bulgaria and Their Present and Likely Future Impact on Agricultural Activity. Agricultural Policy Analysis Unit, Bulgarian Ministry of Agriculture. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.G., 1950. Resource Allocation Under Share Contracts,Journal of Political Economy, 58 (2), pp. 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.W., 1982. Location and Land Tenure,Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72(3), pp. 314–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopeva D., 1993. Results of Survey in Kyustendil Region. Agricultural Policy Analysis Unit, Bulgarian Ministry of Agriculture. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lines, A., Halsey, L., and Saeva, S., 1993.What is the Value of Land in the Kyustendil Region?Kyustendil Fruit Growing Institute, Bulgarian Agricultural Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkov, T., 1960.Land Rent in Bulgaria During Capitalism.Science and Art Publishing House, Sofia, Bulgaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishev, P. and Kopeva, D., 1993. Expected Patterns of Land Leasing in Bulgaria in the Next Ten Years. Paper presented at a workshop of the AFRC-PHARE Programme and American Leading Project. September, Sofia, Bulgaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D.M.G., 1975. The Choice of Rental Contract in Peasant Agriculture. In: L.G. Reynolds (Ed.),Agriculture in Development Theory, pp. 109–139, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D.M.G. and Stiglitz, J.E., 1979. Sharecropping, Risk Sharing and the Importance of Imperfect Information. In: J.A. Roumasset, J.M. Boussard, and I. Singh. (Eds.),Risk,Uncertainty and Agricultural Development, pp. 311–339. Agricultural Development Council, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trendafilov, R., 1993. Development of the Agrarian Reform. Institutes of Agricultural Economics, Sofia, Bulgaria. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, D.L., 1974. Tenant Farming in Iowa, 1860–1900: A Study of the Terms of Rental Leases,Agricultural History, 48 (1), pp. 130–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bishop, S., Howe, K., Kopeva, D., Mishev, P. (1994). Land Markets and Tenure. In: Schmitz, A., Moulton, K., Buckwell, A., Davidova, S. (eds) Privatization of Agriculture in New Market Economies: Lessons from Bulgaria. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1388-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1388-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4608-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1388-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics