Skip to main content

Experiments in Robust Decision Making

  • Chapter

Abstract

Many demonstration experiments have shown that expected utility theory is not sufficiently adequate from a descriptive point of view. We report on a project emphasizing on experiments dealing with the issue of imprecision in preferences. We try to quantify how several factors may influence inconsistencies in decision making experiments. Then, we study whether these inconsistencies may be due to imprecision in preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allais, M. (1953) Le comportamente de I‘homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l‘ecole americaine, Econometrica, 21, 503–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. (1992) Toward the demise of economic man and woman,in Edwards (ed) Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, P. (1984) Utility assessment methods, Mgt. Sci., 30, 1283–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J. and C. Orme. (1992) Circles, triangles and straight lines, presented at FUR VI, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. (1991) Consistent choice and sexes, in Chikan (ed), Progress in Decision, Utility and Risk Theory, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, L. R. (1985) Effects of problem representation on the sure-thing and substitution principle, Mgt. Sci., 31, 738–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland, J. (1990) A theory of approximate expected utility, WP Dept. of Economics, Carnegie Mellon Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K.R. and S. Larsson (1979) Utility theory: axioms versus paradoxes, in Allais and Hagen (eds) Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox, Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, H. (1974) Effects of problem representation and feedback on rational behavior in Allais and Moriat type problems, Dec. Sci., 5, 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ríos Insua, D. and J. Martín (1994) On the foundations of robust decision making, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenfeld, T. (1988) Utility theory without independence or without ordering, Economics and Philosophy, 4, 267–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Nitzsch, R., and M. Weber (1988) Utility function assessment on a micro-computer: an interactive procedure, Ann. Oper. Res., 16, 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ríos, S., Ríos-Insua, S., Ríos Insua, D., Pachón, J.G. (1994). Experiments in Robust Decision Making. In: Ríos, S. (eds) Decision Theory and Decision Analysis: Trends and Challenges. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1372-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1372-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4600-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1372-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics