Abstract
The class of linear models induced by possible allocations of units in an experimental design with hierarchical or cross classification is investigated. Properties of comparison criteria of experiments are given. The sufficient condition for a model to be better than another one, given by Shaked and Tong (1992), is generalized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bailey, R. A. (1981). Distributive block structures and their automorphismums In: K. L. McAveney, Ed., Combinatorial Mathematics VIII, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 884. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 115–124.
Dawid, A. P. (1988). Symmetry models and hypotheses for structured data layouts. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 50, 1–34.
Giovagnoli, A., Pukelsheim F. and Wynn H.P. (1987). Group invariant ordering and experimental designs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 17, 159–171.
Giovagnoli, A. and Wynn H.P. (1985). G-majorization with applications to matrix orderings. Linear Algebra and its Applications 67, 111–135.
Hauke, J. and Markiewicz A. (1993). On comparison of allocations of units in experimental designs with hierarchical and cross classification. Raport No.11/93 of Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Agricultural University of Poznań.
Marshall, A. W. and I. Olkin (1979). Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. Academic Press, New York.
Peres, C. A. and Ting Hui-Ching. (1993). Optimum allocation for point estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 49th Session. Contributed Papers, 329–330.
Pukelsheim, F. (1987). Majorization ordering for linear regression designs. In: T. Pukkila and S. Puntanen, Eds., Proceedings of the Second International Tampere Conference in Statistics. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Tampere, 261–274.
Rao, C.R. (1973). Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.
Shaked, M. and Tong Y.U. (1992). Comparison of experiments via dependence of normal variables with a common marginal distribution. The Annals of Statistics 20, 614–618.
Stepniak, C. (1983). Optimal allocation of units in experimental designs with hierarchical and cross classification. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics A 35, 461–473.
Stgpniak, C. (1987). Reduction problems in comparison of linear models. Metrika 34, 211–216.
Stepniak, C. (1989). Stochastic ordering and Schur-convex functions in comparison of linear exper-iments. Metrika 36, 291–298.
Styan, G.P.H. (1983). Schur complements and linear statistical models. In: T. Pukkila and S. Puntanen, Eds., Proceedings of the First Tampere Seminar in Linear Models. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Tampere, 35–75.
Torgersen, E. (1991). Comparison of Statistical Experiments. Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge.
Yurramendi, Y. (1993). Structural comparison of hierarchical classifications. 4th Conference of the International Federation of Classification Societies, Paris. Collection of abstracts, 298–299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hauke, J., Markiewicz, A. (1994). Properties of Comparison Criteria of Normal Experiments. In: Caliński, T., Kala, R. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Linear Statistical Inference LINSTAT ’93. Mathematics and Its Applications, vol 306. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1004-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1004-4_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4436-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1004-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive