Abstract
An evalution of government policy must be based on the objectives as well as on the criteria of the intervention policy to be analyzed. The evalution must also test how well suited the plan and implementation of policy measures are to achieve these goals. Although most evaluations are limitied to this level, it should only be the first stage. A comprehensive understanding of the evaluation of government action requires that the objectives of the policy be questioned and that the extent to which the aims pursued agree with basic political economic decisions be investigated. This is where the “market” as a basic coordinating mechanism comes into the picture. The underlying principle constituting a market economy, leaving the allocation of resources up to the decisions of individual actors, is based on the conviction that, as a rule, coordination by the market is best suited for achieving the highest possible degree of welfare. For this reason government intervention in the market process or corrections of decisions made by economic actors must be justified. It must be proven that there is a market failure in the area in question, i.e. that undesirable effects for society as a whole will result. In addition, we have to test the consequences of the specific type of intervention for the level of general welfare.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acs, Zoltan J., and David B. Audretsch (1990), Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge: MIT Press
Arrow, K, (1962), “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention”, in National Bureau of Economic Research, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Cambridge (Mass.), 609–626.
Baumol, W., J.C Panzar, R.D. Willig (1982), Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, New York (Harcourt).
Bernstein, J.I (1988), “Costs of Production, Intra-and Interindustry R&D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 21, 324–347.
Cohen, WM., R.C Levin (1989), Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure, in Schmalensee, R., R.D. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. II, 1059–1107, Amsterdam (North-Holland).
Cohen, W.M., DA. Levinthal (1989), Innovation and Learning: The two Faces of R&D, Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.
David, P.A. (1985), Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review, 75, S. 332–336.
Ewers, H.-J., M. Fritsch, M. (1987), “Zu den Gründen staatlicher Forschungs-und Technologiepolitik” (On the Reasons for Technology-Promoting Programs), in Boettcher, E., Ph. Herder-Dorneich, K.-E. Schenk, eds., Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, 6, Tübingen (Mohr/Siebeck), 108–135.
Fritsch, M, Th. Wein, H.-J. Ewers (1993), Marktversagen und Wirtschaftspolitik-Mikroökonomische Grundlagen staatlichen Handelns (Market Failure and Economic Policy-Microeconomic Foundations of Government Action), München (Vahlen).
Griliches, Z. (1993), The Search for R&D Spillovers, NBER Working Paper, Cambridge/Mass.
Grossman, G., E. Helpman, E. (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge/Mass. (MIT Press).
Joffe, A.B. (1986), Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value, American Economic Review, 76, 984–1001.
Joffe, A.B. (1988), Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth, Review of Economics and Statistics, 70,431–437.
Katz, M.L., C Shapiro (1985), Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility, American Economic Review, 75, 424–440.
Katz, M.L., Shapiro, C. (1986), Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 822–841.
Oberender, P. (1987), Möglichkeiten und Grenzen staatlicher Technologieförderung: Eine ordnungspolitische Analyse, Jahrbuch für Sozialwissenschaft, 38, 127–146.
Oppenländer, K.-H. (1988), Wachstumstheorie und Wachstumspolitik (Theory and Policy of Economic Growth), München (Vahlen).
Ray, G.F. (1984), The Diffusion of Mature Technologies, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press).
Romer, P.M. (1990), Endogenous Technical Change, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.
Stoneman, P. (1983), The Economic Analysis of Technological Change, Oxford (Oxford University Press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fritsch, M. (1995). The Market — Market Failure, and the Evaluation of Technology — Promoting Programs. In: Becher, G., Kuhlmann, S. (eds) Evaluation of Technology Policy Programmes in Germany. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0988-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0988-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4428-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0988-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive