Skip to main content

The Implications and Importance of Non-Linear Responses in Modelling the Growth and Development of Wheat

  • Chapter
Predictability and Nonlinear Modelling in Natural Sciences and Economics

Abstract

Crop simulation models are used widely to predict crop growth and development in studies of the impact of climatic change. In seeking to couple meteorological information to crop-climate models it must be remembered that many interactions between crops and weather are non-linear. Non-linearity of response means it is necessary to preserve the variability of weather sequences in order to estimate the effect of climate on agricultural production and to assess agricultural risk. To date, only changes in average weather parameters derived from General Circulation Models (GCMs) and then applied to historical data have been used to construct climatic change scenarios and in only a few studies were changes in climatic variability incorporated. Accordingly, a computer system, AFRCWHEAT 3S, was designed to couple the simulation crop model for wheat, AFRCWHEAT2, with a stochastic weather generator based on the series approach. The system can perform real-time simulations of crop growth and assess crop productivity and its associated risk before harvest using recorded meteorological data from a current season supplemented by stochastically generated meteorological data. The considerable flexibility used to construct climatic scenarios, on the basis of the weather generator, makes AFRCWHEAT 3S a useful tool in studies of the impact of climatic change on wheat crops. Sensitivity analyses to changes in the variability of temperature and precipitation, as compared with changes in their mean values, were made for location in the UK for winter wheat. Results indicated that changes in climatic variability can have a more profound effect on yield and its associated risk than did changes in mean values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Addiscott, T.M., Heys, P.J. and Whitmore, A.P. (1986), ‘Application of simple leaching models in heterogeneous soils’, Geoderma, 38, 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addiscott, T.M. and Whitmore, A.P. (1987), ‘Computer simulation of changes in soil mineral nitrogen and crop nitrogen during autumn, winter and spring’, Journal of agricultural Science, Cambridge, 109, 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G.S. and Norman, J.M. (1989), ‘The description and measurement of plant canopy structure’, In: G. Russell, B. Marshall and P.G. Jarvis (Eds) Plant Canopies: their Growth, Form and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–19.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Delécolle R., Maas S.J., Guerif M. and Baret F. (1992). ‘Remote-sensing and crop production models -present trends’, Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 47, 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L.O. (1991), ‘Approaches to the simulation of regional climate change: a review’, Reviews of Geophysics, 29, 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, M.F. (1991), ‘Climatic analyses in data sparse regions’, In: R.C. Muchow and J.A. Bellamy (Eds) Climatic risk in crop production: models and management for the semiarid tropics and subtropics. Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.W. and Brown, B.G. (1992), ‘Extreme events in a changing climate: variability is more important than averages’, Climatic Change, 21, 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, G.J., Harrison, P.A. and Parry, M.L. (Eds) (1993), The Effect of Climate Change on the Agricultural and Horticultural Potential in Europe. ECU, Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keulen, H. van and Wolf, J. (1986), Modelling of Agricultural Production: Weather, Soils and Crops. Wageningen: Pudoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S.P. and Woodward, F.I. (Eds) (1988), Plants and Temperature. Cambridge: The Company of Biologists Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R.M. (1975). Deterministics models with chaotics dynamics. Nature, 256, 165–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B. (1978), Leaf and ear photosynthesis of winter wheat crops. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, L.O., Schneider, S.H., Thompson, S.L. and McDaniel, L.R. (1990), Analysis of climate variability in general-circulation models–comparison with observation and changes in variability in 2xCO2 experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 20469–20490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, L.O., Rosenzweig, C. and Goldberg, R. (1992), ‘Effects of changes in interannual climatic variability on CERES-Wheat yields: sensitivity and 2xCO2 general circulation model scenarios’, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 62, 159–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith, J.L. (1987), Microclimatology in Tropical Agriculture. Final Report Part 1. Introduction, Methods and Principles. London: Overseas Development Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J.R. (1984), ‘A model of canopy development in winter wheat’, Journal of agricultural Science, Cambridge, 102, 383–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J.R. (1993), ‘AFRCWHEAT2: A model of the growth and development of wheat incorporating responses to water and nitrogen’, European Journal of Agronomy. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J.R. and Delécolle, R. (1988), ‘The interaction between temperature and other environmental factors in controlling the development of plants’, In: Long S.P. and Woodward F.I. (Eds) Plants and Temperature. Cambridge: The Company of Biologists Ltd, pp. 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J.R. and Miglietta, F. (1992), ‘Modelling the effects of CO2-induced climatic change on cereal crops’, In: Y.P. Abrol (Ed) Impacts of Global Climatic Changes on Photosynthesis and Plant Productivity. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racsko, P., Szeidl, L. and Semenov, M.A. (1991), ‘A serial approach to local stochastic weather models’, Ecological Modelling, 57, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C.W. (1981), ‘Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature and solar radiation’, Water Resources Research, 17, 182–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rind, D., Goldberg, R. and Ruedy, R. (1989), ‘Change in climate variability in the 21st century’, Climatic Change, 14, 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saini, H.S. and Aspinall, D. (1982), ‘Effect of water deficit on sporogenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)’, Annals of Botany, 48, 623–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santer, B.D., Wigley, T.M.L., Schlesinger, M.E. and Mitchell, J.F.B. (1990), Developing Climate Scenarios from Equilibrium GCM Results. Max-Planck-Institut for Meteorologie, Report No. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenov, M.A. and Porter, J.R. (1992), ‘Stochastic weather generators and crop models: climate change impact assessment’, Effects of Global Change on Wheat Ecosystem. GCTE Focus 3 meeting. Saskatoon, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenov, M.A., Porter, J.R. and Delécolle, R. (1993), ‘Simulation of the effects of climate change on growth and development of wheat in the UK and France’, In: G.J. Kenny, P.A. Harrison and M.L. Parry (Eds) The Effect of Climate Change on the Agricultural and Horticultural Potential in Europe. ECU, Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F. and Davies W.J. (1992) Stomatal response to abscisic acid is a function of current plant water status. Plant Physiol., 98, 540–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, A.H. (1988), ‘Estimating losses in the yield of winter wheat as a result of drought, in England and Wales’, Soil Use and Management, 4, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, A.H., Bragg, P.L., Porter, J.R. and Rayner, J.H. (1984), ‘A winter wheat model without water or nutrient limitations’, Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 102: 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, D.S. (1992), ‘Adapting stochastic weather generation algorithms for climate changes studies’, Climatic Change, 22, 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Semenov, M.A., Porter, J.R. (1994). The Implications and Importance of Non-Linear Responses in Modelling the Growth and Development of Wheat. In: Grasman, J., van Straten, G. (eds) Predictability and Nonlinear Modelling in Natural Sciences and Economics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0962-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0962-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4416-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0962-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics