Abstract
The idea that competition influences the distribution and abundance of stream-dwelling organisms has been invoked routinely for more than half a century. Natural populations often are observed to differ in one or more of their ecological requirements; that is, in their niches. As competition theory came to dominate ecology after the mid 1950s, studies of ecological differences flourished, resulting in an extensive literature on resource partitioning. These examples were viewed as evidence that competition was widespread and required a minimum level of niche partitioning to permit coexistence. By the late 1970s skepticism had set in concerning the relationship between niche differences and competition past or present, causing such interpretations to fall from favor. In its place ascended a counter view that also has a long history in stream ecology, that varying environmental conditions coupled with differences in species’ ecologies and life histories may play a greater role in determining species’ abundances than do interactions among species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 J. David Allan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allan, J.D. (1995). Competitive interactions. In: Stream Ecology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0729-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0729-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-35530-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0729-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive